cs.CRSep 22, 2026

An Exposition of GPT Astra's Proof of Lower Bound on DP Continual Counting

Authors: Jalaj Upadhyay

Organizations: Rutgers University

Abstract

The goal of this note is to give a detailed proof, to the best of our understanding, of the recent presentation by Harrison and Leeman (arXiv:2609.17650v01 and arXiv:2609.17650v02) of the proof by Astra on the lower bound for differentially private continual counting. We believe a more natural and easy proof is possible and hope that this note will help in that effort. Prior to the initial preprint by Harrison and Leeman (arXiv:2609.17650v01), Bairaktari and Larsen (arXiv:2607.00876) gave an elegant proof to show a lower bound of Ω(log⁡3/2(n))Ω(\log^{3/2}(n)) for both pure and approximate-DP continual counting, and in personal communication had informed us that they have a proof of optimal Ω(log⁡2(n))Ω(\log^{2}(n)) for pure-differential private continual counting as well. They have subsequently published their Ω(log⁡2(n))Ω(\log^{2}(n)) bound, which is now a joint work of Bairaktari, Dahl, and Larsen (arXiv:2607.00876v3). Their new result is an elegant extension of their technique for approximate-differential privacy. Although the two proofs are technically different, the Astra argument uses related tree geometry introduced in Bairaktari and Larsen.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. The Binary Tree Mechanism is Optimal for Approximate Differentially Private Continual Counting

    Jul 1, 2026Konstantina Bairaktari, Kasper Green LarsenDifferential Privacy

  2. Memorization Is Not Extraction: Tight Differential-Privacy Bounds and Audit Blind Spots

    Aug 27, 2026Xujun Che, Depeng Xu, Shuhan YuanPrivacy Leakage in Language ModelsMemorization in Language Models

  3. Differentially Private Range Subgraph Counting

    Jun 6, 2026Xian Chen, Ruobing Bai, Pan PengDifferential Privacy