cs.CVSep 24, 2026

Training-Free Hold-Usage Detection in Sport Climbing with Foundation Pose Models

Authors: Abu Bakar, Abdullah Aftab, Amir Hamza

Organizations: Virtual University of Pakistan Islamabad, Pakistan · Army Public School and Colleges Rawalpindi, Pakistan · University of Trento, Italy Trento, Italy

Abstract

Detecting which holds a climber uses, and when, underpins automated scoring, movement analysis, and assistive systems for sport climbing. Existing approaches train task-specific models or repurpose 2D pose estimators whose hand keypoint sits at the wrist and foot keypoint at the ankle i.e. offset from the fingertips and toes that actually contact the holds, and whose hands are occluded in roughly half of all frames. We show that a frozen, off-the-shelf pose foundation model is sufficient: using the fingertip and toe keypoints of Sapiens, a per-frame proximity test against the annotated holds, per-limb mutual exclusion, and a short temporal-persistence rule, we detect hold usage without any climbing-specific training. On the The Way Up dataset (22 videos, 10 athletes, two routes), our method reaches an event F_1 of 90.2% on a held-out split (89.8% under leave-one-participant-out cross-validation) and 79.9% over all 22 videos at any temporal overlap, and performs best on footholds (F_1,89.8% overall, 96.6% held-out). Under an identical protocol it exceeds our reproductions of the YOLOv8-pose and ViTPose pipelines at every temporal threshold, with the margin widening under strict timing. An ablation shows that two intuitively helpful additions---dense foundation-feature change gating and body-part segmentation---both hurt, arguing that a minimal, keypoint-only design is the right one for this task. Finally, standard coaching statistics computed from our automatic predictions track ground truth closely (Pearson r=1.00 for climb time, 0.94 for pace), turning ordinary single-camera video into reliable performance metrics with no instrumentation.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Sep 23, 2026cs.CV

Prompt, Probe, Train, or Annotate? Single-camera sports video understanding in amateur settings

Video understanding is usually benchmarked on curated, single-actor, or professionally filmed clips, and a strong score there is routinely read as evidence a model is robust enough for deployment. Amateur team sport is a useful, largely untested place to check that assumption: over eight million students played a school sport in the United States in 2024-25 alone, almost none of it filmed by more than a single fixed camera, with several candidate actors crowded into frame and no operator or second angle to fall back on. Using volleyball as a test case, we ask whether strong performance on general video and world-model benchmarks translates into reliable, per-player attribution once footage is this chaotic, turning footage into statistics through a chain of tasks from finding play boundaries to naming who did what. We evaluate four approaches (prompting and agentic reasoning over frontier vision-language models, classical computer vision with small trained specialists, self-supervised video world models, and manual annotation) at every stage, on 66 amateur matches with 46,648 human-labelled contacts, filmed under conditions no published benchmark uses. No single paradigm wins every stage, and static, single-frame computer vision is not competitive at any stage involving motion or identity. A prompted model segments matches well, yet a far smaller trained model beats it at spotting contacts for a fraction of the cost, and the sport's own rules recover rally outcomes the pixels cannot. Identity is where every automated approach struggles: a jersey number is a static fact temporal reasoning cannot recover if never visible, unlike sporting action, a repeated motor pattern a temporal model can exploit, which is why holistic reasoning improves event detection while identity stays unchanged. We close with where each approach earns its cost, and what transfers beyond volleyball to amateur sport.
Sai Varun Kodathala, Prashanth Pollishetty, Jaylen Cargill
Aug 12, 2026cs.CV

Hand Visibility Detector: Per-Keypoint Visibility Estimation for Hands

Hand Pose Estimation (HPE) is a fundamental technology for various applications such as AR/VR and robotics. In these applications, the visibility of each hand joint in the image is crucial for assessing the reliability of estimation results under occlusion. However, most existing HPE methods output joint positions without explicitly indicating their visibility. Although some methods account for occlusion or visibility, visibility estimation has mainly been used as an auxiliary signal for improving pose estimation. To our knowledge, per-joint hand visibility estimation has not been systematically studied as a standalone task. In this work, we propose Hand Visibility Detector, a model for estimating the visibility of individual hand joints, and present the first systematic investigation of visibility estimation as an independent task. We show that leveraging the prior knowledge of HPE models pretrained on large-scale data as a backbone yields high performance in this task. We further demonstrate the utility of Hand Visibility Detector on a downstream task of 3D hand pose annotation via multi-view triangulation of 2D keypoints, showing that visibility-weighted triangulation reduces reprojection error. Our method is released as a ready-to-use package, and the code and demo are available at https://github.com/ryhara/hand_visibility_detector .
Ryosei Hara, Masashi Hatano, Rintaro Yanagi +3
Aug 13, 2026eess.SP

Foundation models for movement data: Are they ready for prime-time?

Foundation models (FMs) trained on large-scale accelerometer data have been proposed as general-purpose feature extractors for health monitoring, but systematic evidence of their advantages is lacking. We present the first comprehensive evaluation of four open-source accelerometer FMs against supervised baselines covering 19 tasks across the domains of activity recognition including activities of daily living, clinical monitoring, and physiological inference. We find task-dependent performance results: supervised models remain competitive with FMs on human action recognition (HAR), with no consistent advantage for either, while selected FMs lead on fall and stress detection and are the most robust to sensor-placement variation. As frozen feature extractors, FMs are strongest for demographic inference, whereas sleep staging performance remains near chance level for all models. The internal FM representations show strong similarity across layers, highlighting potential for future FM improvements. Linear and frozen probing reveals that UniMTS provides the strongest representations and is the only FM that surpasses the supervised baselines without finetuning. Concept discovery analysis shows all models capture high-intensity activities clearly but struggle with sedentary, complex or ambiguous activities. We provide scenario-based deployment recommendations. Furthermore, we identify FM-derived activity profile inference-moving beyond fixed category classification-as a promising research direction.
Alexander Bräuer, Benjamin Cauchi, Nils Strodthoff