cs.LGAug 12, 2026

Why Clipping Matters in AdaGrad? Toward a High-Probability Theory under Generalized Smoothness

Authors: Alokendu Mazumder, Ayaan Mohd, Harshit Rawat, Arnab Roy, Mayank Baranwal, Punit Rathore

Organizations: Robert Bosch Center for Cyber Physical Systems, IISc Bengaluru · Undergraduate Program, IISc Bengaluru · Department of Computational Data Sciences, IISc Bengaluru · Department of Computer Science and Automation, IISc Bengaluru · 

Abstract

We analyze the original same-step coordinate-wise AdaGrad under generalized smoothness and heavy-tailed noise with bounded variance. In this setting, local curvature may grow sub-quadratically with the gradient norm, and stochastic gradients are assumed to have only bounded conditional second moments. We show that unclipped AdaGrad can become anisotropically miscalibrated: under heavy-tailed noise, the adaptive denominator can learn the geometry of rare noise shocks rather than the local curvature of the objective, leading to a persistent directional distortion that blocks finite-horizon Euclidean progress. We then prove that clipping repairs this failure mode. Our main result is a finite-horizon high-probability guarantee for the original non-lagged AdaGrad update, yielding 1T∑t=0T−1∥∇f(xt)∥2=O(d(log⁡T+log⁡1δ)T),\frac1T\sum_{t=0}^{T-1}\|\nabla f(x_t)\|^2=\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{d\big(\sqrt{\log T} + \log \frac{1}δ\big)}{\sqrt{T}}\right), and hence O~(ε−2)\widetilde{\mathcal O}(\varepsilon^{-2}) complexity. This shows that, for AdaGrad under heavy-tailed noise, clipping is a structural stabilizer of the adaptive geometry rather than merely a robustness heuristic.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

May 18, 2026

Can Adaptive Gradient Methods Converge under Heavy-Tailed Noise? A Case Study of AdaGrad

Many tasks in modern machine learning are observed to involve heavy-tailed gradient noise during the optimization process. To manage this realistic and challenging setting, new mechanisms, such as gradient clipping and gradient normalization, have been introduced to ensure the convergence of first-order algorithms. However, adaptive gradient methods, a famous class of modern optimizers that includes popular Adam\mathtt{Adam} and AdamW\mathtt{AdamW}, often perform well even without any extra operations mentioned above. It is therefore natural to ask whether adaptive gradient methods can converge under heavy-tailed noise without any algorithmic changes. In this work, we take the first step toward answering this question by investigating a special case, AdaGrad\mathtt{AdaGrad}, the origin of adaptive gradient methods. We provide the first provable convergence rate for AdaGrad\mathtt{AdaGrad} in non-convex optimization when the tail index pp satisfies 4/3<p≤24/3<p\leq2. Notably, this result is achieved without requiring any prior knowledge of pp and is hence adaptive to the tail index. In addition, we develop an algorithm-dependent lower bound, suggesting that the existing minimax rate for heavy-tailed optimization is not attainable by AdaGrad\mathtt{AdaGrad}. Lastly, we consider AdaGrad-Norm\mathtt{AdaGrad}\text{-}\mathtt{Norm}, a popular variant of AdaGrad\mathtt{AdaGrad} in theoretical studies, and show an improved rate that holds for any 1<p≤21<p\leq2 under an extra mild assumption.
Sep 26, 2026

Clipped or Unclipped? Finite-Sample Trade-offs for Averaged SGD under Heavy-Tailed Noise

Gradient clipping is widely used to stabilize training, but it need not improve the statistical accuracy of averaged SGD, even under heavy-tailed noise. We derive a finite-sample comparison of clipped and unclipped Polyak-Ruppert averaged SGD under finite conditional pp-th moments, p≥2p\ge2. Our main result gives explicit accuracy and confidence conditions under which, for p>2p>2, the Gaussian term dominates the unclipped deviation bound, so clipping need not improve its leading order. By balancing clipping bias and concentration, we obtain a bound in which the heavy-tail correction depends logarithmically rather than polynomially on the inverse failure probability. At p=2p=2, this improves the confidence dependence of the leading bound. We establish sharpness of the unclipped heavy-tail term through an exact one-dimensional quadratic recursion and extend the comparison to projected convex SGD. We also prove concrete costs of clipping: every fixed finite threshold increases asymptotic variance on a scalar Gaussian quadratic, while whole-gradient clipping can shift the limiting point under asymmetric noise.
Oct 20, 2026

Weak-LαL^α Noise, Strong Guarantees: Gradient Clipping under Affine Heavy Tails

Gradient clipping is a key tool for obtaining high-probability convergence guarantees for stochastic first-order methods under heavy-tailed noise. Existing analyses typically assume a bounded central moment of order α∈(1,2]α\in(1,2], which excludes distributions with tails of order u−αu^{-α} at the critical exponent. In this paper, we consider smooth convex optimization under affine heavy-tailed noise, whose scale may grow with the gradient norm. We derive high-probability convergence guarantees for clipped SGD (Clip-SGD) and its accelerated variant Clip-SSTM under a weak-LαL^α tail condition, which is strictly weaker than the corresponding moment bound. For 1<α<21<α<2, the clipping bounds have the same powers of the clipping level as in the moment case, and both methods attain the additive stochastic rate K−(α−1)/αK^{-(α-1)/α}. The gradient-dependent noise contributes a faster-decaying term of order K−2(α−1)/αK^{-2(α-1)/α}, up to logarithmic factors. At α=2α=2, we characterize the additional logarithmic factor on the Lorentz scale and establish its necessity for the additive error at fixed confidence. We also analyze Clip-SGD with prescribed clipping levels and derive finite-horizon guarantees for reaching a neighborhood determined by the clipping bias. For additive noise, matching lower bounds show that this neighborhood is unavoidable, up to constants and the natural error cap. Numerical experiments with Pareto noise illustrate the theoretical results.