cs.ROSep 25, 2026

RoboMonitor: Label-Efficient Runtime Monitoring of Robot Task Execution via Predictive Representation Learning

Authors: Abhiroop Ajith, Gokul Narayanan, Kyle Coelho, Tingji Zhao, Yash Shahapurkar, Brian Zhu, Melih Erdogan, Ted Krubasik, +2 more

Organizations: Siemens Corporation, USA · ELPIS Lab, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, USA

Abstract

Learned robot policies produce actions, but their outputs alone do not establish whether execution is progressing as intended. Robot execution monitoring requires identifying the current execution phase, detecting failures, and recognizing task completion from observations available during execution. Training such monitors requires annotations that are scarce in datasets collected for robot-policy learning. We present RoboMonitor, a label-efficient vision--language execution monitor that learns from these datasets before introducing monitoring supervision. We pre-train on 25 hours of multi-camera trajectories spanning 12 manipulation tasks and two robot embodiments, using action-conditioned future-feature prediction, inverse dynamics, and masked-present prediction. We then transfer the learned visual and context encoders to a causal monitor and apply temporal supervised fine-tuning (Temporal SFT), which combines supervision throughout each observation window with consistency objectives within and across overlapping windows. At deployment, RoboMonitor requires only the task instruction and camera observations. On a four-task monitoring benchmark, RoboMonitor trained with 52 labeled episodes achieves 93.1% mean phase accuracy and 85.9% macro recall over two fine-tuning seeds, exceeding Qwen3-VL and Robometer trained with the same monitoring supervision. Its phase accuracy also exceeds that of both Qwen3-VL and Robometer trained with 100 episodes. A Qwen3-VL ablation shows that Temporal SFT reduces mean spurious phase switching from 15.23% to 4.95%. In closed-loop deployment, the integrated system completes 39 of 40 simulated Toolbox Sorting trials and 35 of 40 real-world Reel Packing trials, with no false recovery triggers observed.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. ReAP: From Visual Failure Recognition to Action-Conditioned Risk Prediction for Runtime Failure Monitoring

    Oct 12, 2026Jingyuan Liu, Yunpeng Qing, Changxu Wei +1Robot Failure DetectionRobotic Perception

  2. Robo2Process: Benchmarking and Learning Process-Aware Understanding in Vision-Language Robotic Manipulation

    Jun 11, 2026Dayu Xia, Yue Shi, Yao Mu +7VLM EvaluationRobotic Manipulation

  3. Hide-and-Seek in Trajectories: Discovering Failure Signals for VLA Runtime Monitoring

    May 29, 2026Seongheon Park, Wendi Li, Changdae Oh +4Robot Failure DetectionFault Detection