cs.CVSep 26, 2026

CityToolVQA: Tool-Augmented Visual Question Answering for 3D Spatial Cognition in Urban Low-Altitude Environments

Authors: Boao Yu, Yingzhen Nie, Yue Hu, Zhengqiu Zhu, Rusheng Ju

Organizations: College of Systems Engineering, National University of Defense Technology · National Key Laboratory of Digital Intelligent Modeling and Simulation

Abstract

CityToolVQA addresses the weak performance of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) on quantitative tasks in urban low-altitude visual question answering. We divide the seven tasks into qualitative and quantitative groups: qualitative questions are answered directly by the VLM, whereas quantitative questions are handled by an external visual-geometric toolchain that performs object grounding, segmentation, depth back-projection, and spatial computation. The toolchain can be attached to different VLMs in a zero-shot manner; a Depth-Assisted Prompt Inference (DAPI) fallback is triggered when the main-chain detection is invalid or unreliable, and CityToolVQA-SFT adapts the 8B backbone to tool-conditioned inputs. On the 73,324-question Open3D-VQA-v2 test set, CityToolVQA-SFT (Qwen3-VL-8B) reaches 67.6% overall accuracy, and attaching the toolchain to ten open-source VLMs improves quantitative-task accuracy by 12.7-36.9 percentage points. These results indicate that externalizing explicit 3D geometric computation effectively complements the limited ability of RGB-only VLMs to estimate metric distances and object sizes.

Explore similar work

Sep 24, 2026cs.CV

Seeing Is Not Measuring: Tool-Augmented Metric Spatial Reasoning for Vision-Language Models

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) describe scenes well but reason poorly about metric 3D structure such as absolute distances, physical sizes, or egocentric directions. We present a modular, predictor agnostic, tool-augmented framework that equips a small VLM (Qwen3.5-4B) with geometric tools: 3D object detection, metric depth estimation, and deterministic solvers for distance, size and bearing. Each object is detected in the camera frame of its own best view, and the tools use that frame's pose to lift every detection into one shared world frame. Moving metric computation out of the model's weights and into explicit solvers yields large gains on three of four ReVSI-Bench tasks: with a strong monocular detector (WildDet3D), absolute distance rises from 0.46 to 0.74 Mean Relative Accuracy (MRA), relative distance from 39.1% to 67.4%, and relative direction from a below-chance 25.9% to 73.4%. Because any detector can be swapped in behind the tool interface, comparing real detectors against ground-truth boxes separates perception error from reasoning error: orchestration costs only 0.03 MRA. Object size is bounded by the detector: the tools are near-exact on groundtruth boxes (0.97) yet the best real detector barely beats the no-tool baseline (0.61 vs. 0.58), because size reads straight off a box extent monocular detectors get wrong. Without a predefined recipe, the model already sequences the tools correctly on its own, matching a scripted pipeline on three of four tasks.
May 12, 2026cs.CV

3D Primitives are a Spatial Language for VLMs

Vision-language models (VLMs) exhibit a striking paradox: they can generate executable code that reconstructs a 3D scene from geometric primitives with correct object counts, classes, and approximate positions, yet the same models fail at simpler spatial questions on the same image. We show that 3D geometric primitives (cubes, spheres, cylinders, expressed in executable code) serve as a powerful intermediate representation for spatial understanding, and exploit this through three contributions. First, we introduce \textbf{\textsc{SpatialBabel}}, a benchmark evaluating fourteen VLMs on primitive-based 3D scene reconstruction across six \emph{scene-code languages} (programming languages and declarative formats for 3D primitive scenes), revealing that a single model's object-detection F1 can vary by up to 5.7×5.7\times across languages. Second, we propose \textbf{Code-CoT} (Code Chain-of-Thought), a training-free inference strategy that routes spatial reasoning through primitive-based code generation. Code-CoT lifts the SpatialBabel-QA-Score by up to +6.4+6.4% on primitive scenes and real-photo CV-Bench-3D accuracy by +5.0+5.0% for VLMs with strong coding capabilities. Third, we propose \textbf{S3^{3}-FT} (Self-Supervised Spatial Fine-Tuning), which self-supervisedly distills primitive spatial knowledge into general visual reasoning by parsing the model's own Three.js primitive-reconstructions into structured annotations and fine-tuning on the result, with \emph{no human labels and no teacher model}. Training on primitive images alone, S3^3-FT improves Qwen3-VL-8B by +4.6+4.6 to +8.6+8.6% on SpatialBabel-Primitive-QA, +9.7+9.7% on CV-Bench-2D, and +17+17% on HallusionBench; the recipe transfers across model families. These results establish geometric primitives in code as both a diagnostic and a transferable spatial vocabulary for VLMs. We will release all artifacts upon publication.
May 28, 2026cs.CV

Beyond 3D VQAs: Injecting 3D Spatial Priors into Vision-Language Models for Enhanced Geometric Reasoning

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) often struggle with robust 3D spatial reasoning. Prevailing methods that rely on fine-tuning with 3D visual question-answering (VQA) datasets may overfit dataset-specific biases, while integrating specialized 3D visual encoders is often inflexible and cumbersome. In this paper, we argue that genuine spatial understanding should emerge from learning fundamental geometric priors, not only from high-level VQA supervision. We propose GASP (Geometric-Aware Spatial Priors), a framework that injects these priors directly into the LLM's transformer layers. GASP employs a small correspondence head, applied as a deep supervision signal across all layers, and is trained with a dual objective leveraging ground-truth geometry from large-scale video scenes: a contrastive loss on ground-truth point correspondences enforces 2D view-invariance, while a depth consistency supervision resolves 3D geometric ambiguities. Our analysis first provides a diagnostic showing that standard VLMs' internal correspondence matching accuracy is very low (often below 5%). We then demonstrate that our training substantially improves this behavior, boosting peak layer-wise correspondence to over 70% and maintaining over 85% temporal robustness while baselines remain below 5%. These internal improvements translate to significant gains on downstream spatial benchmarks including +18.2% on All-Angles Bench and +29.0% on VSI-Bench, all without training on any 3D VQA data. Our findings indicate that learning from fundamental geometric priors is a promising and generalizable pathway towards VLMs with more reliable 3D spatial reasoning.