VCRE-Fib: View-Conditioned Regional Evidence for Fine-Grained Ultrasound Grading of Schistosoma japonicum-Associated Liver Fibrosis

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) affects approximately 30% of the general population. Ultrasound-based imaging, including B-mode imaging and shear wave elastography (SWE), is widely used for noninvasive fibrosis assessment; however, the role of deep learning-based ultrasound image learning for MASLD risk stratification remains insufficiently characterized. In this study, we developed and evaluated ultrasound image learning pipelines using B-mode and SWE images for fibrosis staging and identification of patients with at-risk metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). A total of 250 ultrasound examinations, one exam per subject, were included. Model performance was evaluated using 3-fold cross-validation with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). End-to-end SWE image learning achieved performance comparable to operator-guided SWE across fibrosis stages. Overall, SWE-based learning consistently outperformed B-mode image learning in fibrosis staging, with AUROC improvements from 0.64 (95%CI: [0.56, 0.72]) to 0.72 (95% CI: [0.65, 0.79]) for F>=2 (significant fibrosis, p=0.11), from 0.67 (95%CI: [0.58, 0.75]) to 0.78 (95% CI:[0.72, 0.85]) for F>=3 (advanced fibrosis, p=0.02), and from 0.69 (95%CI: [0.56, 0.82]) to 0.80 (95%CI: [0.72, 0.89]) for F4 (cirrhosis, p=0.10). These findings highlight the potential of SWE image learning for MASLD risk stratification.

Despite years of methodological progress, how far AI has come in liver fibrosis staging has never been systematically evaluated under the heterogeneous, multi-center conditions that define clinical practice. To address this gap, we introduce LiFS, a large-scale dataset and benchmark derived from the MICCAI 2025 CARE-Liver challenge, comprising 610 patients across multiple centers and scanners with multi-sequence MRI. To the best of our knowledge, LiFS is the first benchmark providing complete gadoxetic acid-enhanced sequences with histopathology-confirmed annotations from diverse real-world scanners. Through systematic evaluation of 9 independently developed methods selected from 96 registered teams against in-cohort radiologist reference results, our findings address how far current AI has progressed toward clinical-level liver fibrosis staging from three complementary perspectives. First, against radiologists, the best AI methods were broadly comparable to the senior radiologist and significantly exceeded the junior radiologist in selected settings, while median AI performance generally approached junior-radiologist levels. Second, from a data perspective, cross-center heterogeneity, label imbalance, and contrast-enhanced sequence variability emerge as the dominant challenges for AI methods. Third, from a technical perspective, methodological design choices, including spatial registration, input dimensionality, multi-modal fusion strategy, and backbone architecture, appear to modulate cross-center robustness, although no single choice alone closes the gap. Overall, LiFS provides a rigorous real-world benchmark for positioning the current state of AI in liver fibrosis staging and for enabling future research on the key challenges that limit clinically reliable deployment.

Differentiating non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) from non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) using ultrasound remains challenging due to subtle tissue alterations and the limited information available in conventional B-mode imaging. In this work, we investigate whether complementary ultrasound representations derived from the same acquisition can improve NASH versus NAFLD classification. Specifically, we combine conventional B-mode ultrasound with physics-guided and local phase-based image representations and evaluate their effectiveness using self-supervised masked autoencoders (MAEs) and graph convolutional networks (GCNs). Experiments were conducted on a multi-site Mayo Clinic cohort consisting of 2,547 liver ultrasound scans from 125 patients. Compared with conventional B-mode ultrasound alone, complementary ultrasound representations consistently improved classification performance, yielding gains of up to 32.4% in accuracy and 91.2% in F1-score. Furthermore, performance improvements were consistently observed across age groups, sex, race, ethnicity,and acquisition sites.