FINE: Future-Informed Navigation Encoding for Data-Efficient Vision-Language Navigation
Authors: Khang H. Nguyen, Hoang Pham Quang Nguyen, Ha Phuong Nguyen, Khanh Dinh Binh, Xuan Ha Nguyen, Vien Ngo, Duy Ho Nguyen Minh, Huan Nguyen, An T. Le
Organizations: VinRobotics · University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) · Center for AI Research, VinUniversity, Vietnam · German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI) · University of Stuttgart · Max Planck Research School for Intelligent Systems (IMPRS-IS) · Intelligent Autonomous Systems, TU Darmstadt, Germany
Adapting vision-language navigation (VLN) policies to new environments is expensive because every additional route and instruction requires an embodied demonstration. Yet standard observation-to-action training uses only a small fraction of the information already contained in each trajectory. In particular, future observations reveal the instruction-relevant landmarks that the agent will encounter, including what they look like and how they are arranged in 3D. We introduce FINE, a Future-Informed Navigation Encoding framework that extracts this latent supervision from existing demonstrations. FINE equips a VLN backbone with two complementary auxiliary representations. First, explicit landmark tokens follow the ordered landmarks specified by the instruction and are trained to predict future landmark regions in both semantic 2D patch-feature space and viewpoint-dependent 3D geometric feature space. Second, an implicit future token learns to distinguish the landmark state that is actually reached from plausible same-scene counterfactual futures generated by a video world model. On R2R-CE and RxR-CE val-unseen, FINE improves InternVLA-N1 by 2.6 and 4.5 success-rate points, respectively, at full training data. More importantly, as demonstrations become limited, the benefit grows: at a 70% demonstration budget, FINE improves success rate by 6.8 points, recovering roughly one-third of the performance lost by reducing the training demonstrations. Project page is available at https://finevln.github.io/.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: A VLN demonstration provides supervision beyond action through future landmark observations. Top : a realworld rollout following carton box → blue table → orange chair → green plant; observations 2 and 5 contain no relevant landmark. Bottom-left : explicit future learning predicts semantic and 3D geometric features of the upcoming landmark. Bottom-right : implicit future learning distinguishes the realized future from same-scene counterfactuals.
Fig. 2: Bottom (train and inference): given the instruction, RGB history, and current observation at time t , the object-aware encoder constructs ordered explicit landmark tokens Etexp={et,jexp}j=1S and an implicit future token etimp . After VLM processing, the resulting representations Etexp and e~timp , together with the shared context ht , condition the original action decoder. Top (training only): the explicit branch decodes each landmark token into semantic predictions s^j,p and 3D geometric predictions g^j,p for the corresponding future landmark region, matched to frozen targets sj,p and gj,p . The implicit branch projects e~timp to zt , which is pulled toward the realized future-landmark representation yt+ and pushed away from cross-episode and same-scene counterfactual futures.
Budget
Method
NE ↓
OS ↑
SR ↑
SPL ↑
100%
NaVILA [ 3 ]
5.20
61.6
54.0
49.0
+ FINE
5.00
63.1
55.6
50.7
InternVLA-N1 [ 5 ]
4.83
63.3
58.2
54.0
+ FINE
4.29
65.7
60.8
55.2
70%
NaVILA [ 3 ]
6.76
46.9
36.2
29.5
+ FINE
6.19
50.6
41.7
35.5
TABLE I: Demonstration-budget comparison on R2R-CE val-unseen. Baseline and FINE use identical training subsets and matched optimization within each budget. Differences are in points.
Method
Observation
R2R-CE Val-Unseen
RxR-CE Val-Unseen
Pano.
Odo.
Depth
S.RGB
NE ↓
OS ↑
SR ↑
SPL ↑
NE ↓
SR ↑
SPL ↑
nDTW ↑
CMA [ 32 ]
✓
✓
✓
6.20
52.0
41.0
36.0
8.76
26.5
22.1
47.0
ETPNav [ 15 ]
✓
✓
✓
4.71
65.0
57.0
49.0
5.64
54.7
44.8
61.9
ScaleVLN [ 4 ]
✓
✓
✓
4.80
–
55.0
51.0
–
–
–
–
NaVid [ 1 ]
✓
5.47
49.1
37.4
35.9
–
–
–
–
UniNaVid [ 6 ]
✓
5.58
53.3
47.0
42.7
6.24
48.7
40.9
–
TABLE II: VLN-CE R2R and RxR val-unseen results at 100% training data. Prior results are from original publications and may differ in observation space and external data; InternVLA-N1 DualVLN and NaVILA are evaluated from the authors’ released checkpoint. Ours uses no external data 2 2 2 Refers to VLN demonstration data; see Sec. IV-C and Table V for the auxiliary world model’s role. ; JanusVLN † uses ∼ 10.7M external image-action pairs. Pano.: panoramic RGB; Odo.: odometry; S.RGB: single-view RGB. Best in bold , second best underlined ; –: not reported.
Model
Data
Experiment 1
Experiment 2
Experiment 3
NaVILA
100%
60 / 2.3
10 / 8.8
0 / 10
+ FINE
100%
65 / 2.2
15 / 7.2
10 / 8.5
InternVLA-N1
100%
80 / 0.4
30 / 3.5
30 / 5.5
+ FINE
100%
85 / 0.4
60 / 2.3
50 / 4.2
InternVLA-N1
70%
60 / 1.7
10 / 6.4
10 / 6.7
+ FINE
70%
75 / 1.5
25 / 3.7
25 / 4.2
TABLE III: Real-world evaluation with SR (%) ↑ and NE (m) ↓ . Experiments 1–2: single-room (visible and occluded landmarks); Experiment 3: room-to-room (multiple landmarks).
100%
70%
Method
NE ↓
OS ↑
SR ↑
SPL ↑
NE ↓
OS ↑
SR ↑
SPL ↑
Baseline
4.83
63.3
58.2
54.0
6.45
46.0
38.5
34.4
+ explicit only
4.38
64.4
59.5
53.3
5.96
53.8
44.4
38.3
+ implicit only
4.46
65.7
59.6
54.4
5.58
48.6
42.5
37.4
+ FINE (full)
4.29
65.7
60.8
55.2
5.58
56.0
45.3
40.2
TABLE IV: Contribution of the two FINE branches on R2R-CE val-unseen, at 100% and 70% demonstrations.
Base
Variant
NE ↓
OS ↑
SR ↑
SPL ↑
S=2 slots
6.21
47.0
40.0
36.0
Expl.
S=10 slots
5.96
53.8
44.4
38.3
S=18 slots
5.96
49.0
41.3
36.3
Expl.
Semantic only
6.04
48.8
42.0
37.2
Geometric only
5.96
50.0
42.9
37.7
Semantic + Geometric
5.96
53.8
44.4
38.3
TABLE V: Design choices on R2R-CE val-unseen at the 70% budget (Table IV baseline: 38.5 SR). Base marks rows built on the Expl. (explicit-only) or Impl. / Full configuration; see text for details.
Fig. 3: Qualitative results from the real-world deployment of FINE. Given an instruction, the robot moves through different areas of the workspace and stops at the specified goal.
End-to-end vision-language navigation (VLN) with causal vision-language models maps instructions and egocentric observations directly to actions, but standard behavior cloning supervises only the next action and does not explicitly encourage the policy state to be predictive of future visual outcomes, limiting long-horizon decision making. A privileged-input diagnostic shows that access to an expert-trajectory future image can substantially improve navigation, indicating that future observations contain rich, actionable cues, though such inputs are unavailable at deployment. Motivated by this signal, we propose Future-State-Conditioned VLN (FSC-VLN), a deployable model that augments a causal policy with a future-query token and uses training-only future-state supervision to distill information from future observations into the policy state. Concretely, during training we align the future-query representation to a frozen visual embedding Δ steps ahead, while inference requires only past and current observations. This design preserves the baseline inference pattern and adds only two learned prefix tokens, implying minimal overhead. On R2R val-unseen, FSC-VLN improves SR/OSR/SPL over a StreamVLN-style baseline under two training-data regimes, with larger gains on long-horizon episodes; ablations further support the dual-query design that separates future and action queries.
Lingfeng Zhang, Zhanguang Zhang, Liheng Ma +2
Noah’s Ark Lab, 2012 Labs, Huawei · Department of Foundation model, 2012 Labs, Huawei
Vision-and-language navigation (VLN) in continuous environments requires an agent to ground instructions in egocentric observations while maintaining spatial understanding across long action sequences. Recent navigation foundation models have shown strong progress by scaling vision-language models, but they often learn navigation primarily as direct action generation, without explicitly modeling world states or predicting their future evolution. We introduce FutureNav, a VLM-based unified world-action modeling framework for vision-and-language navigation. Specifically, FutureNav jointly encodes text, visual, and spatial features and feeds them into the LLM, and optimizes four objectives for simultaneous world and action modeling: an action policy objective for navigation action prediction, inverse and forward dynamics objectives for modeling state transitions, and a future generation objective for predicting future spatial states. This unified architecture strengthens action prediction while explicitly modeling the world, without sacrificing inference speed. Extensive experiments show that, with only a 4B-scale backbone, FutureNav achieves state-of-the-art performance on multiple VLN benchmarks and substantially outperforms prior VLN methods, paving the way toward future world-action models for VLN. We will release the code and models to support future research.
Lingfeng Zhang, Zeying Gong, Xiaoshuai Hao +7
Tsinghua University · Pengcheng Laboratory · Xiaomi EV +2
Vision-and-language navigation (VLN) requires an agent to track progress through an extended instruction, identify landmarks relevant to its current objective, and understand the surrounding spatial structure to act. End-to-end navigation policies typically rely on action supervision to implicitly learn these capabilities. Without explicit guidance on the evidence underlying each decision, however, policies can overfit to correlations predictive of training actions rather than learn the task-relevant grounding and geometry needed for generalization. Our insight is to guide the representations that connect instructions to actions: identifying what remains to be done determines which visual evidence matters, while understanding the geometry around that evidence informs how to move. We introduce GuidedNav, a unified framework that explicitly shapes these representations through training-time guidance. Subtask and landmark guidance steer native pre-action attention toward the active instruction segment and relevant visual regions, grounding action prediction in the current objective. Spatial guidance aligns the policy's internal representations with geometric features that capture long-horizon context and local spatial structure. Together, these objectives strengthen navigation capabilities while avoiding the inference overhead of intermediate textual reasoning and online geometric encoding. We also introduce Guided-R2R and Guided-RxR, two annotation-enriched navigation datasets that support more interpretable VLN research. GuidedNav establishes state-of-the-art performance among the compared monocular RGB policies, improving success rates by 8.1% and 13.1% relative to the strongest prior results on R2R-CE and RxR-CE val-unseen, respectively, while achieving faster inference. Extensive experiments further demonstrate the effectiveness and real-world transferability of our approach.
Jingyu Guo, Jiaxin Huang, Chengxing Lin +6
University of Melbourne · AgiBot · Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence +3