Driving decisions depend on both where to focus and how to act on what is seen. Effective driving reasoning must establish which objects matter, where they are, and how they inform the intended action. Text-based rationales can describe a driving response while leaving its correspondence to specific visual evidence implicit. Visual focus provides a concrete starting point for this connection by identifying what matters in the scene and where it is. We propose FocusDrive, a structured multimodal reasoning framework that organizes end-to-end planning around explicit visual focus. It pairs descriptions of decision-relevant objects with image-patch references, bringing explicit visual focus into the reasoning that generates driving plans and trajectories. We first assess this focus representation through driver gaze prediction, then investigate its role in planning reasoning using driving-focus annotations within existing NAVSIM training scenes. Experiments on W3DA and NAVSIM demonstrate competitive gaze prediction and end-to-end planning performance, with FocusDrive improving over text-based chain-of-thought. These results support visual focus as an effective link between scene understanding and driving action.
Figures & tables
Appendix figures & tables4 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Figure 1: Gaze readout architecture. The middle block is repeated three times, giving five convolutional layers in total. Operations within each block run from top to bottom; upsampling uses bilinear interpolation.
Figure 2: Qualitative gaze comparisons on six safety-critical BDD-A test scenes. Columns from left to right: input scene, ground-truth gaze, DualGaze-VLM, FSDAM, and FocusDrive (ours). FocusDrive predictions are produced by the readout of Eq. 2 without ground-truth focus references or attention explanations.
Object category
Share (%)
Vehicle
84.43
Traffic light
7.18
Stop sign
5.32
Pedestrian
2.92
Bicycle
0.10
Other
0.04
Appendix
Table 1: Object-category distribution among training focus annotations.
Figure 3: Additional planning examples involving stop signs, traffic lights, a vehicle, and a pedestrian. Each row pairs the front-camera image with its visual focus distribution, BEV trajectory, and generated focus and action plan. Red squares denote FocusDrive trajectories; <patch> denotes a selected image-patch reference. Heatmaps visualize the softmax distribution over image-patch reference logits at the reference decoding step, displayed on the patch grid with per-scene color scales.
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have emerged as a promising paradigm for end-to-end autonomous driving. However, existing VLAs' training relies heavily on text-centric visual question answering and chain-of-thought reasoning data, which emphasizes linguistic reasoning rather than action-grounded planning. As a result, the learned representations capture semantic knowledge but lack spatial dependencies crucial for reliable trajectory prediction. We propose DriveTeach-VLA, a framework that explicitly teaches VLAs what to see and where to look. Driving-aware Vision Distillation (DVD) injects driving-specific perceptual priors into the vision encoder, while 2D Trajectory-Guided Prompts (2D-TGP) provide spatial conditioning aligned with feasible driving trajectories. Together, they form a vision-guided learning pipeline: what to see (DVD pretraining) - where to look (TGP-guided SFT) - how to act (TGP-guided GRPO). DriveTeach-VLA achieves the state-of-the-art performance on NAVSIM and nuScenes. Our code is available at: https://github.com/ShivaTeam/DriveTeach-VLA.
Yuguang Yang, Canyu Chen, Zhewen Tan +10
School of Electronic Information Engineering, Beihang University · Institute for AI Industry Research (AIR), Tsinghua University · National College for Excellent Engineers, Beihang University +5
Vision-language models (VLMs) have advanced scene understanding and enabled explicit reasoning in end-to-end autonomous driving. However, existing methods insufficiently integrate spatial-physical evidence into planning reasoning, while reasoning adaptation remains coarse-grained and falls short of scene-specific planning demands. Furthermore, reasoning-path optimization for higher planning quality remains largely unexplored in autonomous-driving post-training. To address these limitations, we propose FactorDrive, an end-to-end autonomous driving framework for adaptive multi-step reasoning driven by planning-critical factors (PCFs). We first perform large-scale driving-domain instruction tuning to establish foundational driving knowledge. Building on this foundation, we construct PCF-CoT, a chain-of-thought (CoT) dataset that grounds planning reasoning in trajectory-relevant spatial-physical evidence and organizes reasoning around scene-specific PCFs, enabling the composition and depth of reasoning paths to adapt to different planning demands. We further introduce Quality Search-Guided Group Relative Policy Optimization (QS-GRPO), which guides Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) with trajectory-level planning rewards to discover reasoning paths with higher planning quality and uses the resulting responses to optimize the policy through GRPO, thereby improving trajectory planning performance. Extensive experiments on both open-loop (nuScenes) and closed-loop-oriented (NAVSIM) benchmarks demonstrate that FactorDrive achieves state-of-the-art planning performance.
Guolei Huang, Tengfei She, Yuxuan Lu +3
1Southeast University · 2Universiti Malay · 3Ant Group +2
Vision-language models (VLMs) have emerged as a promising direction for end-to-end autonomous driving (AD) by jointly modeling visual observations, driving context, and language-based reasoning. However, existing VLM-based systems face a trade-off between high-level reasoning and motion planning: large models offer strong semantic understanding but are costly to adapt for precise control, whereas small VLM models can be fine-tuned efficiently but often exhibit weaker reasoning. We propose NaviDriveVLM, a decoupled framework that separates reasoning from action generation using a large-scale Navigator and a lightweight trainable Driver. This design preserves reasoning ability, reduces training cost, and provides an explicit interpretable intermediate representation for downstream planning. Experiments on the nuScenes benchmark show that NaviDriveVLM outperforms large VLM baselines in end-to-end motion planning.
Ximeng Tao, Pardis Taghavi, Dimitar Filev +2
J. Mike Walker ’66 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA · The Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA