Large Language Models for Model-Based Robot Design

Large language models (LLMs) have recently emerged as a promising tool for automating robot design from high-level specifications, yet they remain ineffective for robots operating under complex physical interactions. This limitation stems from the gap between language-based reasoning and the physical consequences of embodiment, often resulting in designs with low physical validity. In this work, we propose a multi-layered framework, AID-SR, that establishes a closed loop by translating simulator-observed physical states into structured feedback for the LLM designer. Combined with semantic critique, human feedback, and iterative refinement, the framework promotes the generation of physically feasible and functionally meaningful robot designs. We evaluate our approach on tendon-driven continuum robots across a benchmark of 14 tasks spanning reaching, grasping, locomotion, and manipulation. The proposed framework achieves 96.2% rate for passing the simulation feasibility check and by applying a common reinforcement learning training, 26.7% robots can successfully fulfill the corresponding task. We then fabricate three designed robots of AID-SR that successfully complete the task in real-world. These extensive experiments across simulation and real-world environments demonstrate and break the wall of utilizing the LLMs for automated design of continuum robots. The source code and experimental resources are publicly available at https://github.com/UNITES-Lab/AID-SR.

Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate Computer-Aided Design (CAD), yet lack physical comprehension required for reliable engineering design. Instead of attempting to implicitly learn physical laws from data, we propose a Hybrid Agentic-Physical Architecture that embeds validated knowledge-based engineering tools directly into the decision making loop of autonomous AI agents. In this framework, engineering design is formulated as a closed-loop, sequential decision making process guided by explicit physical verification. Based on a load case, dedicated agents iteratively plan, generate, evaluate, and revise engineering designs using knowledge-based tools as a feedback signal. We introduce a benchmark dataset and metrics for assessing functional validity in generative CAD. Our system generates more complex and physically verified designs, with a 4.2 increase in structural complexity and improving compile rate by 3.5% compared to similar agentic methods. The codebase, prompts and dataset will be made publicly available to support reproducibility and future research.

Although remarkable capabilities have been demonstrated by Large Language Models (LLMs) across scientific domains, feedback controller design remains underexplored. Existing benchmarks focus mainly on linear single-Degree-of-Freedom (DoF) systems and large API-hosted models, leaving performance on complex controller-design tasks and feasibility for edge deployment unclear. To address these limitations, we introduce the Complex Dynamics-to-Control Benchmark for Large Language Models (CoDyControlBench), comprising 132 system configurations across five evaluation dimensions: number of DoF, system type, coupling level, damping regime, and controller type. Six state-of-the-art LLMs were evaluated over three independent runs, including three commercial models (GPT, Gemini, and Claude) and three open-source models (GLM, DeepSeek, and Qwen). GPT achieved the highest design success rate at 94.8%, whereas Qwen showed the lowest rate at 50.0%. Across the benchmark dimensions, DoF and controller type exhibited the largest model-averaged variations in design success, with success-rate ranges of 36.3% and 17.6%, respectively, exceeding those associated with system type, coupling level, and damping regime. Comparison of GPT and Qwen showed that their performance gap arose mainly from the control-design knowledge, particularly gain selection and the use of transient-limiting mechanisms. For edge deployment, a specialized 1.5B-parameter model was developed through reasoning distillation. The reasoning-distilled model outperformed the answer-distilled and base model on CoDyControlBench, maintained stable performance across 1-6 DoFs, and achieved successful traget tracking in all three physical trials on a pneumatic-artificial-muscle-driven robotic arm. These results establish a benchmark baseline and highlight the potential of lightweight, edge-deployable controller-design models.