Bridging Language and Physics: Automated Design of Continuum Robots with Large Language Models
Authors: Jingyi Chen, Mohan Zhang, Laura Yao, Yingtai Ni, Jianmin Ji, Jie Peng, Song Wang, Tianlong Chen
Organizations: School of Computer Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China · Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA · Department of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have recently emerged as a promising tool for automating robot design from high-level specifications, yet they remain ineffective for robots operating under complex physical interactions. This limitation stems from the gap between language-based reasoning and the physical consequences of embodiment, often resulting in designs with low physical validity. In this work, we propose a multi-layered framework, AID-SR, that establishes a closed loop by translating simulator-observed physical states into structured feedback for the LLM designer. Combined with semantic critique, human feedback, and iterative refinement, the framework promotes the generation of physically feasible and functionally meaningful robot designs. We evaluate our approach on tendon-driven continuum robots across a benchmark of 14 tasks spanning reaching, grasping, locomotion, and manipulation. The proposed framework achieves 96.2% rate for passing the simulation feasibility check and by applying a common reinforcement learning training, 26.7% robots can successfully fulfill the corresponding task. We then fabricate three designed robots of AID-SR that successfully complete the task in real-world. These extensive experiments across simulation and real-world environments demonstrate and break the wall of utilizing the LLMs for automated design of continuum robots. The source code and experimental resources are publicly available at https://github.com/UNITES-Lab/AID-SR.
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as proposal generators for evolutionary robot design, yet most loops remain memoryless: simulator results shape the next population but are not preserved as reusable design knowledge. We present Auto-Robotist, a self-evolving LLM agent that distills morphology-search traces into an explicit natural-language skill library. Each skill stores a structural archetype, evidence-grounded positive and negative rules, and the evaluated designs that support them, making design memory inspectable rather than implicit in a population. During search, the agent retrieves skills to condition LLM edits of elite bodies while retaining a Genetic Algorithm (GA) mutation path for exploration; after evaluation, it updates the library through Add, Diagnose, and Merge. Across seven EvoGym tasks spanning locomotion, traversal, and object interaction, Auto-Robotist improves cold-start 5x5 search and transfers learned skills to 10x10 design spaces, where reference-conditioned transfer outperforms GA on every task. These results suggest that LLM agents can convert expensive physical evaluations into reusable, auditable design principles. Our code will be released upon acceptance.
We introduce Debate2Create (D2C), a multi-agent LLM framework that formulates robot co-design as structured, iterative debate grounded in physics-based evaluation. A design agent and control agent engage in a thesis-antithesis-synthesis loop, while criterion-specific LLM judges provide multi-objective feedback to steer exploration. Across five MuJoCo locomotion benchmarks, D2C achieves the highest default-normalized score among the evaluated LLM-based and black-box baselines, with gains up to 3.2x on Ant and nearly 9x on Swimmer. Iterative debate yields 18-35% gains over compute-matched zero-shot generation, and D2C-generated rewards transfer to default morphologies in 4/5 tasks. These results suggest that structured, simulator-grounded multi-agent interaction is a useful mechanism for joint morphology-reward optimization under a fixed-topology, per-candidate-RL protocol. Project page: debate2create.github.io.
Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate Computer-Aided Design (CAD), yet lack physical comprehension required for reliable engineering design. Instead of attempting to implicitly learn physical laws from data, we propose a Hybrid Agentic-Physical Architecture that embeds validated knowledge-based engineering tools directly into the decision making loop of autonomous AI agents. In this framework, engineering design is formulated as a closed-loop, sequential decision making process guided by explicit physical verification. Based on a load case, dedicated agents iteratively plan, generate, evaluate, and revise engineering designs using knowledge-based tools as a feedback signal. We introduce a benchmark dataset and metrics for assessing functional validity in generative CAD. Our system generates more complex and physically verified designs, with a 4.2 increase in structural complexity and improving compile rate by 3.5% compared to similar agentic methods. The codebase, prompts and dataset will be made publicly available to support reproducibility and future research.