AI-Driven Collaborative Assembly Line Inspection: System Integration and Deployment Challenges
Organizations: Department of Research and Development, TEKNOPAR, Ankara, Türkiye
Abstract
Manual visual inspection on assembly lines is a persistent manufacturing bottleneck: operator fatigue over extended shifts lowers defect-detection rates. This paper presents the design, integration, and field deployment of an AI-assisted collaborative inspection cell at the Silverline kitchen-appliance factory, developed within the AI-PRISM project. The cell couples a Universal Robots UR 10e cobot carrying a machine-vision defect-detection pipeline with a Comau Racer-5 cobot for functional tests, coordinated through ROS 2 Humble on an Ubuntu 22.04 LTS server. Multi-modal data (Basler camera imagery, TIA microphone acoustics, and SPS electrical-safety measurements) are logged locally and visualised in real time with Grafana. We report the practical deployment challenges (close-proximity safety, AI robustness under glare and reflections, ROS 2 namespace collisions across two cobots, and operating-system and dependency issues) together with the engineering solutions adopted, and structure the integration through a four-level Human-Robot Interaction analysis. The deployed cell cuts per-unit quality-check time from 82 s to 61 s (about 25%), raises final-control resource efficiency from 0.75 to 0.88, reduces operator visual-inspection viewing time by 82%, and significantly lowers operator mental demand (p = 0.005, NASA-TLX).
Figures & tables
| Component | Specification |
|---|---|
| Inspection cobot | Universal Robots UR 10e collaborative manipulator |
| Functional-test cobot | Comau Racer-5 collaborative manipulator, TCP/IP driver |
| End-effector camera | Basler ace industrial camera, USB 3.0, with anti-glare polarising lens and annular LED ring |
| Cell-overview camera | Dahua IP security camera |
| Acoustic sensor | TIA microphone, interfaced via signal conditioner and a LabJack DAQ |
| Electrical safety tester | SPS KT1885 electronic safety tester, serial interface |
| Indicator | Baseline | Achieved |
|---|---|---|
| Hood detection & tracking accuracy | — | 100% |
| 2D defect-detection accuracy | — | 85% |
| Per-frame inference latency | — | 0.25 s |
| End-to-end perception latency | — | 0.5 s |
| Per-unit QC time (U4_KPI5) | 82 s | 61 s ( %) |
| Resource efficiency (U4_KPI4) | 0.75 (3 ops) | 0.88 (1 op, %) |