Benign Overfitting for General Norms and Distributions

Grokking shows that fitting the training data and learning the underlying signal can occur at very different stages. However, existing theories offer limited quantitative insight into how this delayed generalization depends on inductive bias and signal structure. Our work addresses the gap by developing a statistical theory that characterizes how regularization geometry and signal sparsity govern generalization near interpolation. In particular, we focus on the prototypical setting of high-dimensional regression and identify regimes in which sparsity-promoting regularization makes exact interpolation much more accurate than approximate fitting. In strongly overparameterized noiseless problems, we prove a zero--one generalization law and construct a family of convex norms whose interpolators transition from the trivial risk of the all-zero predictor to exact recovery, while keeping the training error equal to $0$. Furthermore, when feature dimension and sample size are proportional, we provide a precise characterization of training and generalization errors along $\ell_r$-regularization paths. This in turn allows us to quantify the generalization gain that remains near interpolation: we show that this gain increases as the norm becomes more sparsity-promoting and as the target becomes sparser, with a sharp drop in generalization reached for noiseless data and $\ell_1$ regularization. Experiments on diagonal linear networks and transformers trained on modular arithmetic demonstrate the generality of our theoretical predictions. Finally, beyond grokking, our work reveals a statistical instability in minimum-norm interpolation: small perturbations in the regularization strength can lead to drastically different generalization, while preserving small training error.

The practical success of deep learning has led to the discovery of several surprising phenomena. One of these phenomena, that has spurred intense theoretical research, is ``benign overfitting'': deep neural networks seem to generalize well in the over-parametrized regime even though the networks show a perfect fit to noisy training data. It is now known that benign overfitting also occurs in various classical statistical models. For linear maximum margin classifiers, benign overfitting has been established theoretically in a class of mixture models with very strong assumptions on the covariate distribution. However, even in this simple setting, many questions remain open. For instance, most of the existing literature focuses on the noiseless case where all true class labels are observed without errors, whereas the more interesting noisy case remains poorly understood. We provide a comprehensive study of benign overfitting for linear maximum margin classifiers. We discover a phase transition in test error bounds for the noisy model which was previously unknown and provide some geometric intuition behind it. We further considerably relax the required covariate assumptions in both the noisy and noiseless cases. Our results demonstrate that benign overfitting of maximum margin classifiers holds in a much wider range of scenarios than was previously known and provide new insights into the underlying mechanisms.

Let $S$ be the set of unit norm linear classifiers $θ\in \mathbb{R}^d$ which correctly classify every point of a labeled dataset $(X_i,y_i)_{i=1}^n$, $X_i \in \mathbb{R}^d$, $y_i \in \{-1,+1\}$, with a possibly negative margin $κ$ fixed in advance. Under two natural data-generating distributions of the $(X,y)$ pairs -- a Gaussian mixture model and a logistic model with Gaussian features -- and in the proportional regime $n/d \to α$ with small enough $α$, we establish a large deviation principle on the event that a point $θ$ chosen uniformly at random from $S$ achieves a given generalization error, with high probability over the choice of the data. The associated large deviation rate function is deterministic and describes the proportion, at the exponential scale in $d$, of interpolating classifiers having a given desired performance. As a consequence, we establish the following concentration phenomenon: all but an exponentially small fraction of interpolating classifiers have approximately the same generalization performance given by the unique maximizer of this rate function. We numerically compare this maximizer to the performance of empirical risk minimization by gradient descent and to the performance of a natural linear program, both finding a point in $S$, and deduce that in the overparametrized regime of small $α$, these efficient procedures outperform the vast majority of interpolators, pointing to their nontrivial benign overfitting in this setting.