Polylogarithmic Nash Regret in Matrix Games with Bandit Feedback

We study last-iterate convergence in unknown two-player zero-sum matrix games with bandit payoff feedback and observed opponent actions. For games with $d$ actions per player, we develop an algorithm achieving a duality gap of $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{d/t})$ with high probability, simultaneously at every round $t$. This improves the dimension dependence of the best previously known guarantee by a factor of $d^{3/2}$. The rate matches a standard bandit lower bound, establishing minimax optimality in both the number of actions and the number of rounds, up to logarithmic factors. The algorithm is computationally efficient, requiring only $\mathcal{O}(d)$ time and memory per round. Our technical contribution is a joint design of adaptive averaging and corrected exponential weights that absorbs estimation variance, together with a potential argument that bounds phase durations.

We study the problem of learning minimax policies in zero-sum matrix games. Fiegel et al. (2025) recently showed that achieving last-iterate convergence in this setting is harder when the players are uncoupled, by proving a lower bound on the exploitability gap of Omega(t^{-1/4}). Some online mirror descent algorithms were proposed in the literature for this problem, but none have truly attained this rate yet. We show that the use of a log-barrier regularization, along with a dual-focused analysis, allows this O-tilde(t^{-1/4}) convergence with high-probability. We additionally extend our idea to the setting of extensive-form games, proving a bound with the same rate.

Last-iterate convergence of learning dynamics in games has attracted significant recent attention. In two-player zero-sum games with bandit feedback, where only the loss of the selected action pair is observed, Fiegel et al. (2025) show a separation between average-iterate and last-iterate convergence in duality gap: while the optimal t^(-1/2) rate after t rounds is achievable for the former via standard no-regret algorithms, the latter cannot converge faster than t^(-1/3) in expectation or t^(-1/4) with high probability. However, in many practical settings, such as preference learning, the players observe not only their loss but also the opponent's action. This raises a natural question: can such additional information enable faster last-iterate convergence? We answer this question affirmatively, showing that t^(-1/2) last-iterate convergence is achievable with high probability in this setting, via an efficient algorithm that updates its strategy infrequently by solving an estimated log-barrier-regularized game. We identify fundamental obstacles preventing standard analysis for multi-armed bandits, the single-player case, from generalizing to games, and develop a novel analysis to overcome them. Experiments confirm that our algorithm indeed converges faster than naive baselines and prior methods that do not exploit opponent-action feedback. Finally, we note that our results also improve those for dueling bandits, a special case with skew-symmetric game matrices.