Drug-Target Interaction Prediction via Hierarchical Sequential Cross-Attention over Chemical and Protein Language Models

Accurate prediction of drug-target interactions (DTI) is critical for drug discovery. Existing methods often rely on single-modal representations (e.g., sequences or graphs) or combine only two modalities, overlooking 3D structural features. To address this challenge, we propose TriMod-DTI, a triple-modal contrastive learning framework that incorporates 1D sequences, 2D graphs, and 3D structures of drugs and proteins, obtaining the universal and complementary feature representations for DTI prediction. We design a Feature Extractor to capture drug and target features across the three modalities, thereby enriching their representations. We further propose a triple-modal contrastive learning strategy to align different modal representations of the same drug or protein in the latent space. By constructing cross-modal positive and negative sample pairs, this approach enhances the model's discriminative ability. Experiments on three benchmark datasets demonstrate that TriMod-DTI outperforms state-of-the-art methods. The ablation studies validate the contributions of each modality. Moreover, case studies highlight its practical potential for DTI prediction and drug discovery.

Drug-target interaction (DTI) and affinity (DTA) predictors increasingly achieve strong benchmark scores, yet their internal use of sequence, fingerprint, and graph features often remains opaque. We present an interpretability audit of BridgeDPI architecture on three different datasets including Gao, Human, and C.elegans. This study combines gradient-based attributions -- integrated gradients, saliency, layer-wise relevance propagation, SmoothGrad, and SmoothGrad-IG -- with feature-wise occlusion ablation and strict intersection consensus across methods to reduce single-explainer bias. We summarize sensitivity and signed effects at raw inputs, at the bridge similarity scaffold, and through the graph convolution, including edge-level sensitivities and targeted edge removals. The results show that explainability is most informative when treated as model criticism: it reveals modality dominance, padding and special-token artifacts, dataset-dependent cooperative versus suppressive effects across layers, and chemistry-consistent fragment and composition motifs where methods agree. These analyses do not substitute for structural or experimental ground truth, yet they can provide testable hypotheses for downstream validation in computational drug discovery pipelines. More broadly, applying modern XAI to contemporary DTI/DTA models is still an early pass over the rich structure implicit in trained weights and data -- yet even this first layer of scrutiny already helps researchers relate predictions to drug- and target-side representations and to prioritize external validation.

Deep learning models for drug--target interaction (DTI) prediction often achieve strong benchmark performance without necessarily relying on mechanistically meaningful molecular features, a limitation that standard accuracy-based evaluation cannot detect. We introduce ISAAC (Intervention-based Structural Auditing Approach for Causal Reasoning), a post-hoc framework that evaluates prior-relative structural sensitivity by probing frozen models through matched mechanistic and spurious input-level interventions, independently of predictive accuracy. Applied to three sequence-based DTI architectures on the Davis benchmark, ISAAC reveals approximately 25% relative differences in reasoning scores across models with comparable AUROC (within around 3%), stable across training and intervention seeds and two distinct perturbation operators. These discrepancies, undetectable under conventional accuracy metrics, motivate the use of post-hoc structural auditing as a complement to standard performance evaluation in scientific machine learning for molecular modeling.