cs.LGSep 28, 2026

Beyond Gradient Flow: Identifiability and Recovery from Distribution Snapshots

Authors: Nam D. Nguyen, Valeriya Malysheva

Organizations: VIB, Center for Molecular Neurology, Antwerp, Belgium · VIB, Center for AI and Computational Biology, Leuven, Belgium · Faculty of Pharmaceutical, Biomedical and Veterinary Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium · Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium · Trinity Hall, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

Abstract

Inferring dynamics from snapshots of evolving distributions is fundamentally underdetermined: the Fokker-Planck equation constrains the drift FF only through its score-weighted divergence ∇⋅F+F⋅∇log⁡ρ\nabla\cdot F+F\cdot\nabla\logρ, leaving a ρρ-solenoidal gauge invisible to any single-time constraint. Time-indexed transport formulations cannot resolve this ambiguity: every admissible marginal path admits a curl-free explanation, minimum-action reconstruction selects it, and marginal fit alone cannot distinguish dynamically inequivalent explanations. Requiring one autonomous field to explain several marginals instead makes part of the hidden circulation visible as ∇log⁡ρ\nabla\logρ changes across marginals. Separating instantaneous Fokker-Planck source constraints from the snapshot experiment, we show that the source constraints identify the field modulo the kernel of a stacked score-weighted divergence operator. For generic Gaussian shape variation, source constraints at K≥mK\ge m time points in intrinsic dimension mm eliminate every polynomial gauge direction, whereas finitely many density snapshots alone admit aliasing; we give the obstruction explicitly. At a Gaussian anchor, for Sobolev smoothness ss and nn samples per time point, we derive a conditional lower rate (nK)−2s/(2s+m+1)(nK)^{-2s/(2s+m+1)} for the tangent snapshot experiment, with a matching upper rate in a degreewise benchmark. Strong-form fitting is non-orthogonal to score error and cannot be repaired by spectral filtering. Instead, we estimate using smooth test functions while retaining the known diffusion term, and derive a finite-sample bound that separates sampling error from fixed-grid quadrature bias. Planted-circulation experiments confirm the predicted gauge contraction and expose a design tension between cross-slice information and covariance-aware whitening.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables2 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. Discretization and Statistical Consistency of Functional Flow Matching

    Aug 5, 2026Lennon J. ShikhmanConditional Flow MatchingDiscretization

  2. Correcting CondOT: Exact Finite-Step Sampling in Gaussian Flow Matching

    Sep 30, 2026Ron Levy, Michael EladConditional Flow MatchingRejection Sampling

  3. PerFlow: Physics-Embedded Rectified Flow for Efficient Reconstruction and Uncertainty Quantification of Spatiotemporal Dynamics

    May 5, 2026Hao Zhou, Rui Zhang, Han Wan +1Rectified FlowSpatiotemporal Fields