Cross-Organizational SysML Model Integration: A Survey of Challenges and AI-Supported Tasks
Organizations: Product and Systems Engineering Group Technische Universität Ilmenau Ilmenau, Germany
Abstract
Cross-organizational collaboration is widely regarded as a key promise of SysML-based Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE), yet practitioners still face persistent challenges when exchanging and integrating system models. In parallel, Large Language Models (LLMs) raise expectations for AI-assisted model understanding and integration, while reliability and required human oversight continue to pose challenges. This paper reports the results of an online questionnaire survey with 29 MBSE stakeholders involved in cross-organizational collaboration. Respondents rated eight predefined integration challenge categories and six AI-supported task types on five-point Likert scales. The results indicate that stakeholders perceive model integration as a multi-dimensional alignment problem across semantics, behavior, traceability, and exchange interoperability. These perceptions vary by organizational role and frequency of integration involvement. AI is rated highly useful for analysis tasks such as semantic structure analysis and inconsistency detection, and respondents predominantly prefer human-in-the-loop use with mandatory verification. These findings motivate AI support that enhances, rather than replaces, engineering responsibility in SysML-based integration.
Figures & tables
| Label | Category | Median | 4–5 Ratio | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Naming and Semantic Conflicts | 4 | 65.5% | 3.97 |
| B | Structural and Abstraction Challenges | 4 | 51.7% | 3.55 |
| C | Interface and Port Integration Issues | 3 | 34.5% | 3.24 |
| D | Behavioral and Logical Misalignment | 4 | 58.6% | 3.55 |
| E | Methodology and Profile Integration | 3 | 35.7% | 3.11 |
| F | Traceability Gaps | 4 | 58.6% | 3.90 |
| Label | Category | Median | 4–5 Ratio | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Understand model content from textual or structural input | 5 | 75.9% | 4.28 |
| B | Suggest mappings between model elements | 4 | 79.3% | 4.21 |
| C | Identify semantic conflicts or inconsistencies | 5 | 82.8% | 4.34 |
| D | Generate integration workflows and prompts | 4 | 65.5% | 3.72 |
| E | Suggest cross-methodology transformations | 4 | 55.2% | 3.55 |
| F | Support semantic structure analysis | 5 | 89.7% | 4.45 |