Robust and Learned Online Matching in Growing Trees
Authors: Marek Gałązka, Hanna Wdowicka
Organizations: Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland · Department of Statistics, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poznań, Poland
We study irrevocable maximum-cardinality matching in trees revealed by successive leaf attachments, with a known horizon and an exogenous growth law that is misspecified or unknown. For deterministic affine attachment forecasts with nonnegative degree reinforcement, the optimal threshold policy loses at most twice the cumulative expected conditional total-variation error relative to an online oracle knowing the actual growth law. This follows from a unit-span property of the Bellman continuation score and has no additional horizon factor. A four-vertex example attains the coefficient two for the specified deterministic policy, and a two-model argument gives a lower bound linear in the model-error budget for arbitrary policies under general misspecification. For uniform-preferential attachment, the local error has an exact expression through the leaf count. When its constant mixture parameter is unknown, we estimate it from the same growing tree and update the threshold policy at geometric times. A parameter-sensitivity bound for individual Bellman prices and uniform degree-moment estimates yield expected regret O(nlog2n), using O(n2logn) arithmetic operations and O(n) stored entries. The exact minimax rate remains open.
Figures & tables
True θ
Oracle optimum
Greedy
Forecast θ=1
0
333.333
333.333
326.664
0.25
319.190
318.208
316.527
0.50
303.415
300.067
302.627
0.75
283.675
277.911
283.557
1
257.523
250.250
257.523
Table 1: Expected numbers of matched edges for n=1000 , rounded to three decimals. The last column uses the same forecast θ=1 for every true parameter. These are finite-horizon values under the seed-edge convention.
Figure 1: Left: plug-in regret per vertex at n=1000 as the forecast parameter varies. Right: mean absolute error of the clipped inverse leaf-count estimator, evaluated with bisection tolerance 10−8 ; the dashed curve is Corollary 6.2 . Each colour denotes a fixed true parameter. The estimator curves evaluate the full scalar leaf-count law, rather than sampled trees.
Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle, United States · Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, United States