Sign language machine translation has progressed substantially over the past decade, evolving from isolated sign recognition to end-to-end translation systems. Advances in pose estimation, transformer architectures, and large-scale dataset collection have driven progress, yet challenges remain. Datasets are limited compared to spoken-language resources; evaluation metrics inadequately capture the linguistic quality of output; and models must capture the simultaneous, multi-layered, and three-dimensional structure of sign languages. This manuscript provides a comprehensive review that seeks to balance technical challenges with stakeholder considerations. We examine the linguistic properties that make sign languages computationally unique, trace the evolution of recognition, translation, and production systems, and analyze ongoing technical challenges. Crucially, we address ethical considerations around data governance, community involvement, and appropriate use. Drawing on interdisciplinary perspectives spanning computer vision, sign language linguistics, and deaf studies, our analysis emphasizes that continued progress requires sustained collaboration across these fields and with deaf communities.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: A brief history of AI for sign language technologies, highlighting key methodological advances and dataset releases across recognition, translation, and production.
Dataset
Lang
Type
Source
Signers
Gloss
Vocab
Sent
Hours
Purdue RVL-SLLL ( Martínez et al., 2002 )
ASL
Isolated
Lab
14
39
N/A
N/A
-
ASLLVD ( Athitsos et al., 2008 )
ASL
Isolated
Lab
6
2742
N/A
N/A
4
Corpus NGT ( Crasborn & Zwitserlood, 2008 )
NGT
Continuous
Lab
100
-
-
15K
72
BSL Corpus ( Schembri et al., 2013 )
BSL
Continuous
Lab
249
∼ 1800
-
-
125
DGS Corpus ( Konrad et al., 2020 )
DGS
Continuous
Lab
330
∼ 10K
18K
-
50
SIGNUM ( von Agris & Kraiss, 2010 )
DGS
Continuous
Lab
25
450
1K
780
55
Table 1: Overview of sign language datasets. Datasets are characterized by language (Lang), video type (isolated or continuous signing), recording source, number of signers, gloss vocabulary, text vocabulary size (Vocab), number of sentences (Sent), and duration in hours. N/A: annotations not available; ‘-’: unreported statistics.
Sign languages are natural, visual-gestural languages used by Deaf communities worldwide. Over 300 distinct sign languages remain severely low-resource due to limited documentation, sparse datasets, and insufficient computational tools. This systematic review synthesizes literature on sign language recognition and translation for under-resourced languages, using Azerbaijan Sign Language (AzSL) as a case study. Analysis of global initiatives extracts eight actionable lessons, including community co-design, dialectal diversity capture, and privacy-preserving pose-based representations. Turkic sign languages (Kazakh, Turkish, Azerbaijani) receive special attention, as linguistic proximity enables effective transfer learning. We propose three paradigm shifts: from architecture-centric to data-centric AI, from signer-independent to signer-adaptive systems, and from reference-based to task-specific evaluation metrics. A technical roadmap for AzSL leverages lightweight MediaPipe-based architectures, community-validated annotations, and offline-first deployment. Progress requires sustained interdisciplinary collaboration centered on Deaf communities to ensure cultural authenticity, ethical governance, and practical communication benefit.
Nigar Alishzade, Gulchin Abdullayeva
Engineering Faculty of Karabakh University, Khankendi, Azerbaijan · MSERA Institute of Mathematics, Baku, Azerbaijan
Sign languages are expressive visual languages used by Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing (DHH) communities. Despite substantial progress in sign-language recognition, translation, and production, advances remain constrained by fragmented datasets, inconsistent annotations, and limited linguistic coverage. Existing benchmarks often fail to reflect real-world communication needs, and systematic analyses of these limitations remain limited. In this survey, we present a comprehensive index of sign-language datasets, covering 120 resources across 35 sign languages. We analyze key challenges such as modality imbalance, annotation granularity, and signer bias, and outline considerations for future dataset design. We also introduce a 24-field Sign-Language Datasheet and release a public GitHub repository (https://github.com/Ginqwerty/Open-Sign-Language) to support standardized documentation and reproducible evaluation. Overall, our work provides a unified and practical foundation for developing inclusive, robust, and scalable sign-language technologies in real-world applications.
Yiming Ni, Zhi-Qi Cheng, Jiayu Li +1
Tacoma School of Engineering & Technology, University of Washington
The field of sign language translation has witnessed significant progress in the translation between sign and spoken languages, but the translation between sign languages remains largely unexplored and out of reach. The latter can help 1.5 billion deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) people worldwide communicate across language barriers without relying on hearing interpreters or written-language fluency. The cascade approach composing separate sign-to-text, text-to-text, and text-to-sign systems suffers from error propagation and extra latency as well as the loss of information unique in the visual modality. We aim to develop direct sign-to-sign translation. However, a large-scale open-domain parallel corpus has not been curated between sign languages. To enable direct translation between sign language utterances, we use back-translation to produce synthetic sign-sign pairs from unaligned individual language utterance-sign corpora. Using this data, we jointly train a single MBART-based model for both text->sign (T2S) and sign->sign (S2S). On synthetically generated paired sets between American Sign Language (ASL), Chinese Sign Language (CSL), and German Sign Language (DGS), our direct S2S method outperforms the cascaded baseline on geometric sign error metrics (20% lower DTW-aligned MPJPE) and language matching metrics after predicted sign utterances are translated back to sentences (50% high BLEU-4) while achieving a roughly 2.3* speedup. On a small set of pre-existing cross-lingual sign data, we find similar improvements for our proposed method.