Precision over Scale: A Polish-Silesian Benchmark and a Translation System Outperforming Open-Source and Commercial Models

Neural Machine Translation (NMT) and Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at cross-lingual tasks but often fail to capture intra-lingual morphological variation, marginalizing dialectal speakers. In Bangla, existing translation frameworks commonly rely on Standard Colloquial Bangla (SCB) as an intermediate pivot, which can compound errors and reduce cross-dialectal nuance. To address this gap, we introduce a unified, multi-directional NMT system for direct translation between SCB and eleven regional variants. We first review prior dialectal NLP resources to identify existing technological gaps. As a foundational contribution, we construct and release a large multi-dialect parallel corpus for Bangla, comprising 14,562 aligned rows and 51,541 non-null sentence pairs through the integration of seven prior datasets and native-speaker-verified manual augmentation. Using this corpus, we benchmark state-of-the-art sequence-to-sequence architectures with parameter-efficient Weight-Decomposed Low-Rank Adaptation (DoRA). Results show that deep monolingual pre-training is more effective than large multilingual capacity for this task. The compact BanglaT5 model outperforms NLLB-200 and mBART-50 by up to 13.96 BLEU, achieving 29.26 BLEU, 57.26 chrF++, and 49.68 METEOR. A dataset scaling study shows diminishing returns beyond 3,000 parallel pairs and indicates that linguistic proximity to Standard Bangla is more important than raw data volume for translation quality. Finally, we deploy the optimized model as an INT8-quantized web application, providing a scalable, open-source framework for inclusive language technology and equitable digital access.

For scientific progress, we need benchmarks that test the limits of state-of-the-art models, and evaluation methods that inform us about failure cases. As models get stronger, standard benchmarks for machine translation are approaching saturation. Further, automatic translation metrics are unreliable, opaque, and vulnerable to reward-hacking. Even gold human evaluation is not problem-free, because it often lacks reproducibility, objectivity, and scalability. Overall, this prevents us from tracking progress in the field and identifying pathways for improvement. We introduce the Last Translation Benchmark, a collection of human-authored and peer-reviewed examples (texts, images, audio, videos) that break leading machine translation models. We also present a new evaluation approach: each example comes with handcrafted verification rules describing concrete failure cases on that example, therefore allowing reliable and actionable future evaluation. The Last Translation Benchmark is a live dataset that accepts ongoing contributions. The latest version is LTBv1, containing accepted contributions prior to September 1st 2026, with future releases planned as new data is continuously collected.

Large language models (LLMs) frequently exhibit performance biases against regional dialects of low-resource languages. However, frameworks to quantify these disparities remain scarce. We propose a two-phase framework to evaluate dialectal bias, operationalized as comprehension degradation relative to standard Bengali, in LLM question-answering across nine Bengali dialects. First, we translate and gold-label standard Bengali questions into dialectal variants adopting a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipeline to prepare 4,000 question sets. Since traditional translation quality evaluation metrics fail on unstandardized dialects, we evaluate fidelity using an LLM-as-a-judge, which human correlation confirms outperforms legacy metrics. Second, we benchmark 19 LLMs across these gold-labeled sets, running 68,395 RLAIF evaluations validated through multi-judge agreement and human fallback. Our findings reveal severe performance drops linked to linguistic divergence. For instance, responses to the highly divergent Chittagong dialect score 5.44/10, compared to 7.68/10 for Tangail. Furthermore, increased model scale does not consistently mitigate this bias. We contribute a validated translation quality evaluation method, a rigorous benchmark dataset, and a Critical Bias Sensitivity (CBS) metric for safety-critical applications.