End-to-End Learning vs. Modular Architectures: Comparative Insights into Autonomous Driving Systems

Kartik B. Kapse

cs.ROOct 1, 2026

End-to-End Learning vs. Modular Architectures: Comparative Insights into Autonomous Driving Systems

Authors: Kartik B. Kapse

Organizations: AI Engineering of Autonomous Systems, Dept. Electrical Engineering and IT, Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt

Abstract

Autonomous driving systems have become a central focus of intelligent transportation research, with End-to-End Learning and Modular Architectures offering two prominent design paradigms for their implementation. E2E Learning uses deep learning algorithms to map raw sensory inputs directly to driving actuators, providing a streamlined and adaptable solution. while Modular Architectures employ a pipeline-based approach, dividing the system into distinct subsystems for perception, cognition, planning, and control. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of these paradigms, focusing on their strengths, limitations, and trade-offs to provide insights into their suitability for various autonomous driving applications. The study evaluates key factors such as interpretability, scalability, robustness, and real-world applicability. While End-to-End Learning emphasizes simplicity and adaptability in dynamic environments, it lacks transparency and is highly dependent on large datasets. Conversely, Modular Architectures offer superior interpretability and task-specific optimization, but face challenges related to integration complexity and scalability. To address these limitations, hybrid approaches that combine the strengths of both paradigms have emerged, offering a promising direction for overcoming these challenges. Beyond this comparative synthesis, following work proposes a Four-Dimensional Architecture Selection Framework, comprising twelve binary criteria across safety, operating environment, data/computational resources, and deployment context, and validate it against ten published autonomous driving systems, correctly recommending 7/10 deployed architectures. This work synthesizes existing literature to highlight key trade-offs between the paradigms and identifies hybrid architectures as a promising direction for future research.

Explore similar work

Oct 1, 2026cs.RO

A Survey on End-to-End Autonomous Driving Training from the Perspectives of Data, Strategy, and Platform

Autonomous driving is a cornerstone technology for the future of intelligent transportation, where end-to-end learning has emerged as a transformative paradigm that directly maps multimodal sensory inputs to driving actions through unified differentiable models. While offering advantages, the effectiveness of end-to-end autonomous driving (E2E-AD) is ultimately determined by the quality of its training ecosystem. This paper provides a comprehensive review of training methods and ecosystem for E2E-AD. We introduce a Data-Strategy-Platform taxonomy that conceptualizes training as an interdependent system. The data layer defines what can be learned, the strategy layer governs how learning aligns with driving objectives, and the platform layer supports scalability and continuous evolution. Within this framework, we survey recent advances across data-centric pipelines, learning paradigms, and training infrastructures, and analyze their interplay in shaping model performance, robustness, and deployability. Finally, we reflect on current limitations and articulate a forward-looking vision that emphasizes a shift from data quantity to data value, from isolated optimization to foundation-driven generalization, and from static training to integrated training-testing loops, aiming toward robust, scalable, and trustworthy autonomous driving systems. We maintain a continuously updated repository tracking cutting-edge literature and works at \href{https://github.com/Jiaaqiliu/Awesome-Training-Ecosystem-for-E2E-AD}{Our Project Page}.

Chengkai Xu, Yiming Cui, Jiaqi Liu +7

College of Transportation, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China

Causality-Aware End-To-End Autonomous Driving Autonomous Driving Taxonomy

Ask PDF

May 19, 2026cs.RO

HEAT: Heterogeneous End-to-End Autonomous Driving via Trajectory-Guided World Models

End-to-end autonomous driving has emerged as a compelling alternative to traditional modular pipelines by directly mapping raw sensor data to driving actions. While recent approaches achieve strong performance on single-domain datasets, their performance degrades significantly when trained jointly across multiple heterogeneous domains. In practice, however, autonomous systems must operate across diverse environments with heterogeneous distributions, including different cities, sensor configurations, and traffic patterns, without domain-specific retraining. This gap highlights a key challenge in multi-domain learning: domain-specific variations across heterogeneous domains introduce conflicting learning signals, driving models toward compromised solutions that are suboptimal across domains. To address this, we propose a trajectory-driven learning paradigm that organizes training around planning trajectories, enabling the model to capture domain-invariant representations of driving intent. Furthermore, we incorporate a world model that predicts future latent features conditioned on ego actions, improving feature consistency and mitigating domain-induced biases. We evaluate our approach on three benchmarks, nuScenes, NAVSIM, and the Waymo end-to-end dataset, and show substantial improvements over existing methods across all domains. Our results demonstrate that a single unified model can be trained on heterogeneous datasets while maintaining strong performance within each domain, highlighting a step toward scalable real-world deployment. We will make our code publicly available.

Hoonhee Cho, Giwon Lee, Jae-Young Kang +3

1All authors are with KAIST, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

Causality-Aware End-To-End Autonomous Driving Autonomous Driving Waymo Open Motion Dataset Ego-Trajectory Prediction

Ask PDF

Feb 21, 2026cs.CV

Driving Like Yourself: A Benchmark for Closed-Loop Personalized End-to-End Autonomous Driving

Human driving behavior is inherently diverse, yet most end-to-end autonomous driving (E2E-AD) systems learn a single average driving style, neglecting individual differences. Achieving personalized E2E-AD faces challenges across three levels: limited real-world datasets with individual-level annotations, a lack of quantitative metrics for evaluating personal driving styles, and the absence of algorithms that can learn stylized representations from users' trajectories. To address these gaps, we propose Person2Drive, a comprehensive personalized E2E-AD platform and benchmark. It includes an open-source, flexible data collection system that simulates realistic scenarios to generate scalable, diverse personalized driving datasets; style vector-based evaluation metrics with Maximum Mean Discrepancy and KL divergence to comprehensively quantify individual driving behaviors; and a personalized E2E-AD framework with a style reward model that efficiently adapts E2E models for safe and individualized driving. Crucially, our framework enables plug-and-play personalization by fine-tuning only the trajectory prediction head, preserving the pretrained base model and ensuring safety. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Person2Drive enables fine-grained analysis and effective personalization, while preserving driving performance and success rate even in challenging scenarios.

Xiaoru Dong, Ruiqin Li, Xiao Han +7

The University of Hong Kong · ShanghaiTech University · The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Causality-Aware End-To-End Autonomous Driving Naturalistic Driving Data Autonomous Driving

Ask PDF