LS-AR: Future-Predictive Latent Steering in Autoregressive LLMs
Organizations: Electronic & Electrical Engineering University College London London, UK
Abstract
Standard autoregressive (AR) models process high-level task instructions, state history, and transient tokens within a single shared sequence of tokens. Consequently, they lack the architectural mechanisms needed to isolate macro-objectives from context noise. To overcome this single-channel limitation, we introduce Latent-Steered Autoregressive (LS-AR), a dual-channel architecture that decouples continuous goal steering from discrete token decoding via FiLM conditioning. We evaluate a Static Goal Encoder (P_0) for persistent macro-objective retention across long rollouts and a Dynamic State Tracker (P_t) for recurrent latent updates during generation. On long-horizon retrieval past context limits (H=1024, W=500), LS-AR (Static) achieves 100% target recall where parameter-matched baselines collapse (0%), while increasing throughput by ~35% and cutting peak VRAM by 52.8%. In Blocksworld planning under forced perturbations (k=1), LS-AR (Dynamic) sustains an 89.0% completion rate vs. 71.0% for the baseline, though zero-shot entity scaling (N -> N+1) exposes single-vector capacity limits (0%). Finally, dual-channel authority analysis shows that text goal dropout establishes latent-dominant control, offering structural defence against text prompt injection while introducing a latent vector attack surface.
Figures & tables
| Horizon ( ) | Architecture | Target Retrieval (Semantic) | Passkey Retrieval (Numeric) |
| (In-Context) | Baseline (AR GPT-2) | ||
| LS-AR (Static) | |||
| (Out-of-Context) | Baseline (AR GPT-2) | ||
| LS-AR (Static) |
| Context Size | Architecture | Throughput ( ) | Speed | Peak VRAM ( ) | Memory |
| Baseline-Small ∗ (38M) | – | – | |||
| Baseline-Large (89M Anchor) | Anchor | Anchor | |||
| LS-AR (Static 85M) | +34.23% | -32.46% | |||
| Baseline-Small ∗ (38M) | – | – | |||
| Baseline-Large (89M Anchor) | Anchor | Anchor | |||
| LS-AR (Static 85M) | +40.82% | -42.99% |
| Architecture | In-Distribution ( ) | OOD generalisation | ||
| (Optimal) | (1 Mistake) | (Zero-Shot) | (Zero-Shot) | |
| Baseline (AR GPT-2) | ||||
| LS-AR (Static) | ||||
| LS-AR (Dynamic) | ||||
| Random FiLM Ablation | 0.0% | – | – | – |
| Context Size | Architecture | Decoder Depth | Throughput ( ) | Speed | Peak VRAM ( ) | Memory |
| Baseline-Small (13M) | 4 Layers | – | – | |||
| (Decoder-Matched) | ||||||
| Baseline-Large (32M) | 10 Layers | Anchor | Anchor | |||
| (Parameter-Matched) | ||||||
| LS-AR (Dynamic 32M) | 4 Layers (Dec) | +33.56% | 0.41% | |||
| + 4 Layers ( ) |
| Condition | Architecture | Standard Curriculum | Latent-Forced Curriculum | ||
| Textual Goal, Injected Latent Goal | Goal A Success | Goal B Success | Goal A Success | Goal B Success | |
| Control ∗ ( , ) | Baseline | 0.0% | – | – | |
| LS-AR (Dynamic) | 0.0% | 0.0% | |||
| Control ∗ ( , ) | Baseline | 0.0% | – | – | |
| LS-AR (Dynamic) | 0.0% | 0.0% | |||
| Adversarial † ( , ) | LS-AR (Dynamic) | ||||
Autoregressive Language Modeling
Autoregressive language modeling predicts sequences one step at a time, using prior tokens to generate text, speech, code, and other data.
See all 127 papers