DexJoCo-X: Benchmarking Action Representations for Multi-Hand Dexterous Manipulation
Organizations: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, China. · Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China.
Abstract
As dexterous hands proliferate, collecting data and training policies separately for every morphology becomes increasingly impractical. Scalable cross-embodiment learning therefore requires a unified representation that captures shared manipulation structure while preserving morphology-specific control. Differences in hands, tasks, datasets, and control interfaces prevent existing studies from isolating the effects of representation, pretraining, and architecture. We introduce DexJoCo-X, a benchmark and toolkit for controlled comparison across seven representative dexterous hands, six single-arm and bimanual tasks, and 2,100 balanced demonstrations. DexJoCo-X provides a matched multi-hand, multi-task protocol with common scenes, success criteria, and execution interfaces, redesigned glove-to-hand mappings, and an automated pipeline that expands reviewed demonstrations across randomized scenes. Using , Ego-Pi, and Being-H0.5, we examine whether a shared action interface is sufficient for multi-hand learning. Expanding to an 80-dimensional bimanual output yields near-zero success. Ego-Pi preserves the pretrained action head through interleaved prediction and supports per-hand multi-task learning, but remains ineffective for seven-hand joint training. By contrast, Being-H0.5 combines cross-embodiment pretraining, a unified action space, and embodiment-aware experts, enabling one policy to control all seven hands. Within this architecture, function-aligned action slots achieve 47.7% mean success, compared with 47.0% for native coordinates and 33.1% for DexLatent. These results show that cross-embodiment representation depends on the entire learning system: action coordinates, pretraining, and architecture must jointly separate shared manipulation structure from embodiment-specific control.
Figures & tables
| Policy (training) | Representation | XHand | Inspire | Wuji | LEAP | Sharpa Wave | LinkerHand | Allegro | Avg. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| + Ego-Pi (per hand) | Native | 62/69/20 | 29/12/31 | 53/47/3 | 20/25/21 | 37/31/11 | 66/29/4 | 66/16/8 | 31.5 |
| Being-H0.5 (joint) | Native | 87/46/1 | 99/74/72 | 77/85/22 | 50/39/56 | 76/63/6 | 86/58/62 | 67/35/41 | 57.2 |
| FAAS | 93/47/7 | 97/74/69 | 89/85/22 | 65/36/17 | 70/37/0 | 93/63/38 | 53/23/64 | 54.3 | |
| DexLatent | 97/14/1 | 93/41/59 | 15/46/0 | 61/30/0 | 87/49/0 | 94/62/17 | 64/13/9 | 40.7 |
| Setting | + Ego-Pi | Being-H0.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Training scope | 1 hand, 6 tasks | 7 hands, 6 tasks |
| Policies trained | 7 | 1 |
| Adaptation | Full fine-tuning | Full fine-tuning |
| Updates | 5,000 | 120,000 |
| Learning rate | ||
| Warmup updates | 5 | 2,000 |