Organizations: LARIVIA laboratory Dep. of Computer science and Eng. University of Quebec in Outaouais Gatineau, QC, Canada · LARIVIA laboratory and Mixed Research Unit INRS-UQO University of Quebec in Outaouais Gatineau, QC, Canada
Deepfake detection in videos remains challenging, as manipulated content may appear visually consistent at the frame level while exhibiting subtle temporal inconsistencies. This paper introduces an interpretable deepfake detection framework that models spatially and temporally coherent facial features in video sequences. Unlike end-to-end deep models relying on implicit representations, the proposed approach explicitly encodes physically grounded forensic cues, enabling transparent analysis and improved multi-dataset generalization. The pipeline transforms videos into identity-consistent facial trajectories, segments them into fixed-length temporal windows, and represents each frame using 68 structured descriptors spanning four complementary domains: photometric, textural, geometric, and compression-based features. These descriptors provide a compact multi-domain representation of manipulation artifacts and are processed by a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network to capture temporal dependencies and subtle irregularities. Evaluation on four benchmark datasets, FaceForensics++, Celeb-DF v2, a curated subset of the DeepFake Detection Challenge (DFDC), and DeeperForensics, yields strong and consistent F1-scores of 98.0%, 91.0%, 97.6%, and 96.2%, respectively. The approach also demonstrated a good cross-dataset generalization, providing a robust and interpretable solution for video deepfake detection.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Facial analyzed area: (Left) Original input face image, (Middle) Segmented facial region (green overlay) where color and texture features are extracted. Automatically detected landmarks (red dots) used to compute geometric features. The midline divides the face into left (L) and right (R) halves, enabling quantitative assessment of facial symmetry. (Right) is the analyzed regions covering hair-skin contact and jaws.
Photometric
Textural
Geometric
Compression
Idx
Variable
Idx
Variable
Idx
Variable
Idx
Variable
1
mean_R
19
GLCM_contrast_L
43
inter_eye_dist
57
ELA_mean_face
2
mean_G
20
GLCM_contrast_R
44
nose_to_mouth_dist
58
ELA_std_face
3
mean_B
21
GLCM_corr_L
45
mouth_width
59
ELA_mean_mouth
4
std_R
22
GLCM_corr_R
46
mouth_opening
60
ELA_std_mouth
5
std_G
23
GLCM_energy_L
47
face_ratio
61
jpeg_res_face
TABLE I: Complete Feature Set Organized by Forensic Families
Dataset
Acc.
Prec.
Rec.
F1
AUC
FaceForensics++
98.0%
97.9%
98.1%
98.0%
0.995
Celeb-DF v2
91.0%
90.8%
91.2%
91.0%
0.948
DFDC subset
97.6%
97.4%
97.8%
97.6%
0.991
DeeperForensics
96.2%
96.0%
96.4%
96.2%
0.984
Average
95.7%
95.5%
95.9%
95.7%
0.980
TABLE II: Dataset-wise performance of the proposed method. The last row reports the unweighted arithmetic average across datasets, not the global test-set performance.
Predicted Real
Predicted Fake
Real
982
18
Fake
24
976
TABLE III: Illustrative Confusion Matrix on a Balanced Test Subset
Method
Year
Method type / Protocol
Reported quantitative results
Avg. AUC
Amin et al. [ 19 ]
2024
Temporal facial pattern and coherence analysis; evaluated on FF++, DFD, DFDC, DeeperForensics
TABLE IV: Quantitative comparison with recent deepfake detection methods. The table reports only the metrics explicitly provided by the corresponding papers. Since protocols, datasets, and evaluation settings differ across works, this table is intended as a quantitative reference comparison rather than a strict leaderboard.
Dataset
Acc.
Prec.
Rec.
F1
AUC
ForgeryNet
93.8%
93.5%
94.1%
93.8%
0.967
WildDeepfake
89.4%
88.8%
90.2%
89.5%
0.941
TABLE V: Cross-dataset generalization results. ForgeryNet is used as validation and WildDeepfake as test. No retraining is performed.
Dataset
Ground Truth
Pred. Real
Pred. Fake
ForgeryNet
Real
935
65
Fake
59
941
WildDeepfake
Real
887
113
Fake
98
902
TABLE VI: Illustrative confusion matrices for cross-dataset evaluation.
Configuration
Acc.
Prec.
Rec.
F1
AUC
All 4 families
93.8%
93.5%
94.1%
93.8%
0.967
Without photometric
90.9%
90.5%
91.3%
90.9%
0.941
Without textural
91.6%
91.2%
92.0%
91.6%
0.948
Without geometric
92.0%
91.7%
92.4%
92.0%
0.953
Without compression
90.6%
90.1%
91.1%
90.6%
0.938
TABLE VII: Ablation on feature families — ForgeryNet (Validation).
Configuration
Acc.
Prec.
Rec.
F1
AUC
All 4 families
89.4%
88.8%
90.2%
89.5%
0.941
Without photometric
85.8%
85.0%
86.9%
85.9%
0.902
Without textural
86.7%
86.0%
87.6%
86.8%
0.913
Without geometric
87.2%
86.6%
88.0%
87.3%
0.919
Without compression
85.4%
84.6%
86.6%
85.6%
0.899
TABLE VIII: Ablation on feature families — WildDeepfake (Test).
Fig. 2: Distribution of selected photometrc, geometric, textural, and compression-related forensic features for real (orange) and fake (blue) samples extracted from the FaceForensic++ dataset.
Current Vision-Language Models (VLMs) for deepfake detection excel at identifying spatial artifacts but overlook a critical dimension: temporal inconsistencies in video forgeries. Adapting VLMs to reason about these dynamic cues remains a distinct challenge. To bridge this gap, we propose Forensic Answer-Questioning (FAQ), a large-scale benchmark that formulates temporal deepfake analysis as a multiple-choice task. FAQ introduces a three-level hierarchy to progressively evaluate and equip VLMs with forensic capabilities: (1) Facial Perception, testing the ability to identify static visual artifacts; (2) Temporal Deepfake Grounding, requiring the localization of dynamic forgery artifacts across frames; and (3) Forensic Reasoning, challenging models to synthesize evidence for final authenticity verdicts. We evaluate a range of VLMs on FAQ and generate a corresponding instruction-tuning set, FAQ-IT. Extensive experiments show that models fine-tuned on FAQ-IT achieve advanced performance on both in-domain and cross-dataset detection benchmarks. Ablation studies further validate the impact of our key design choices, confirming that FAQ is the driving force behind the temporal reasoning capabilities of these VLMs.
Zheyuan Gu, Qingsong Zhao, Yusong Wang +6
Institute of Artificial Intelligence, China Telecom (TeleAI) · Peking University · Fudan University
The rapid advancement of deepfake generation techniques poses significant threats to public safety and causes societal harm through the creation of highly realistic synthetic facial media. While existing detection methods demonstrate limitations in generalizing to emerging forgery patterns, this paper presents Deepfake Forensics Adapter (DFA), a novel dual-stream framework that synergizes vision-language foundation models with targeted forensics analysis. Our approach integrates a pre-trained CLIP model with three core components to achieve specialized deepfake detection by leveraging the powerful general capabilities of CLIP without changing CLIP parameters: 1) A Global Feature Adapter is used to identify global inconsistencies in image content that may indicate forgery, 2) A Local Anomaly Stream enhances the model's ability to perceive local facial forgery cues by explicitly leveraging facial structure priors, and 3) An Interactive Fusion Classifier promotes deep interaction and fusion between global and local features using a transformer encoder. Extensive evaluations of frame-level and video-level benchmarks demonstrate the superior generalization capabilities of DFA, particularly achieving state-of-the-art performance in the challenging DFDC dataset with frame-level AUC/EER of 0.816/0.256 and video-level AUC/EER of 0.836/0.251, representing a 4.8% video AUC improvement over previous methods. Our framework not only demonstrates state-of-the-art performance, but also points out a feasible and effective direction for developing a robust deepfake detection system with enhanced generalization capabilities against the evolving deepfake threats. Our code is available at https://github.com/Liao330/DFA.git
Jianfeng Liao, Yichen Wei, Raymond Chan Ching Bon +3
Shenzhen Technology University, Guangdong, China · Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore, Singapore · The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China +1
The continuous emergence of high-quality video deepfakes requires detectors that continually adapt to new forgery patterns, yet existing approaches, which are designed for deepfake images, fail to capture video-specific cues. Unlike deepfake images that contain only spatial artifacts, deepfake videos leave distinct evidence along both spatial and temporal axes, necessitating the separate preservation of each modality during sequential model updates. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a continual deepfake video detection framework, Modality-Specific Frequency Distillation (MSFD), that explicitly decomposes video features into spatial, temporal, and spatiotemporal modalities in the frequency domain. This decomposition enables independent preservation of each modality, as different deepfake video types exhibit varying reliance on spatial and temporal cues across tasks. Furthermore, MSFD adopts a cross-modality decorrelation loss that encourages spatiotemporal representations to remain orthogonal to single-modality cues. Extensive experiments show that our framework achieves stronger adaptation and preserves performance more effectively than state-of-the-art methods across diverse continual deepfake video scenarios.
Taehoon Kim, Jongwook Choi, Heejae Jo +2
GS. of AI, Chung-Ang University, Republic of Korea · Dept. of Advanced Imaging, GSAIM, Chung-Ang University, Republic of Korea · Dept. of Metaverse Convergence, Chung-Ang University, Republic of Korea