Learning without Overwriting: A Theory of Self-Distillation and Supervised Fine-Tuning in Continual Reasoning

On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) has emerged as a promising paradigm for improving LLM reasoning, where a privileged teacher with access to reference solutions provides token-level supervision on the student's own generated trajectories. However, we find that OPSD consistently fails on long chain-of-thought (long-CoT) reasoning models, yielding at best marginal gains while destabilizing the reflective reasoning capability these models depend on. Through a novel decomposition of the teacher's supervision signal, we identify the root cause: the teacher's supervision is dominated by a reference-induced component that drives rote memorization of reference-specific shortcuts, while the question-conditioned, inference-transferable component is ignored or actively opposed. Based on this diagnosis, we propose a two-step solution. First, we construct a reference-only teacher (the same model conditioned on the reference without the question) to isolate the non-transferable component of the supervision signal; the residual after subtracting this component captures the question-conditioned, inference-transferable correction. Second, we use pointwise mutual information (PMI) as the mechanism to transform this residual into a well-formed PMI target distribution that the student can directly distill from, filtering out the reference-induced shortcut. Experiments on four long-CoT models across two datasets demonstrate consistent improvements over both the base model and standard OPSD, while preserving the models' natural epistemic behavior throughout training.

On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) improves the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by providing dense token-level supervision for on-policy rollouts. However, existing OPSD methods often yield limited gains on complex reasoning tasks and suffer from severe training instability. We identify two key causes: conditioning the self-teacher on a complete verified solution encourages imitation of complete reference trajectories rather than extraction of transferable reasoning insights, while indiscriminate full-response distillation imposes superfluous supervision on already-valid reasoning prefixes. Together, these issues suppress reasoning diversity and contribute to late-stage mode collapse. We propose Reflective On-policy Self-Distillation (ROSD), which distills transferable reasoning insights rather than complete reference trajectories. For each erroneous rollout, a self-reflector contrasts it with a correct rollout from the same group to derive a corrective idea and identify the sentence containing the first reasoning error. The corrective idea provides the self-teacher with targeted guidance, while the diagnosed error boundary allows ROSD to mask out the distillation loss over the valid prefix and apply token-level distillation only from the first erroneous sentence onward. Experiments across multiple reasoning benchmarks and model backbones show that ROSD consistently outperforms standard OPSD and reinforcement learning baselines, better preserves reasoning diversity, stabilizes training, and mitigates late-stage mode collapse. Code is available at https://github.com/ZiqiZhao1/ROSD.

On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD) has emerged as a popular paradigm for large language model (LLM) self-improvement, allowing models to act as their own teachers by leveraging privileged information such as ground-truth solutions. However, recent findings indicate that OPSD can severely degrade the performance of LLMs on complex reasoning tasks: By forcing the student to imitate an artificially confident reasoning trace conditioned on privileged information, OPSD inadvertently suppresses expressions of uncertainty and penalizes the exploratory, self-corrective behaviors required to solve challenging problems. To address this, we introduce Negative Self-Distillation (NSD), a new framework that optimizes LLMs by diverging from flawed reasoning rather than imitating privileged solutions. Instead of relying on ground-truth answers or external supervision, NSD uses the model itself to generate a question-specific negative condition (eg, acting as a ``careless reasoner'') and pushes the student's distribution away from this self-generated negative teacher. Naively applying unlearning objectives to achieve this divergence is problematic, as flawed reasoning tokens are confounded with basic linguistic tokens; indiscriminately penalizing both risks catastrophically degrading the model's foundational language capabilities. We resolve this by designing a dynamic gating mechanism that automatically identifies and isolates reasoning-critical tokens, ensuring gradient updates target only behavioral flaws while preserving the model's linguistic priors. Empirically, NSD consistently outperforms OPSD and other label-free, self-bootstrapping reinforcement learning (RL) baselines.