cs.LGOct 5, 2026

Loss-Invariant Projections as Passive Probes of Learned Representations

Authors: Akshay Chandrasekhar, Pavlo Melnyk

Organizations: Linköping University

Abstract

Learned feature representations in neural networks often contain structure beyond that directly used by the final task output. We study this structure using passive probes\textit{passive probes} that apply fixed, untrained, property-independent projections to representations as they evolve during training. We motivate this approach through the task of prediction on S2S^2 where equivalent vector and Hermitian parameterizations reveal an additional loss-invariant trace coordinate. This motivates a general construction in which fixed random projections serve as observers of learned features. Because the observer is loss-invariant and independent of the property being studied, changes in accessibility reflect changes in the representation relative to the fixed observer rather than adaptation of the observer itself. We show that ensembles of passive probes can directly reflect task-relevant information such as target alignment. Under our constructions, the accessibility of eventual difficulty evolves differently across tasks. It increases during training in the regression tasks of surface-normal estimation and image inpainting but remains near its initial level in image classification. Comparisons with learned linear probes further show that recoverability and passive accessibility can evolve differently during training. Together, these results show how passive probes can separately characterize changes in representation geometry and the accessibility of eventual task difficulty.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables2 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

May 12, 2026cs.LG

Deep Minds and Shallow Probes

Neural representations are not unique objects. Even when two systems realize the same downstream computation, their hidden coordinates may differ by reparameterization. A probe family intended to reveal structure already present in a representation should therefore be stable under the relevant representation symmetries rather than be tied to a particular basis. We prove that, under standard nondegeneracy assumptions, behaviorally equivalent LLMs have hidden representations related by an invertible affine transformation. The resulting symmetry principle singles out a unique hierarchy of shallow coordinate-stable probes, with linear probes as its degree-1 member. We also show that a natural object for cross-model probe transfer is a shared probe-visible quotient--the representation modulo directions invisible to the probe family--rather than the full hidden state. Experiments on synthetic and real-world tasks support both predictions, showing where degree-2 probes help beyond linear ones and how quotient-based transfer enables coverage-aware monitor portability across model families. These results point toward a broader geometric representation theory of neural probing, with coverage-aware monitor transfer as a concrete operational consequence.
Sep 27, 2026cs.LG

Finite Probes Suffice: Identifiability and Universality for Weight-Space Learning

Learning properties of neural networks has recently attracted growing interest, with existing approaches operating either directly on network parameters or through probe-based representations of network behavior. While probing methods have shown strong empirical performance, their theoretical foundations remain limited. In this work, we study when finite probe-based representations are sufficient for learning neural functionals. We establish general identification and universality results for probing, and show that using intermediate hidden representations can provide significantly more informative representations than relying only on final outputs. Motivated by these results, we introduce HIDDENPROBE, a simple architecture for learning from hidden probe responses. Across a range of neural functional benchmarks, including both MLPs and Transformers, HIDDENPROBE consistently improves over existing probing methods and achieves state-of-the-art performance. Our code is publicly available on GitHub.
Jul 6, 2026cs.LG

Platonic Projection Structures: Operator-Induced Observability in Representation Learning

We characterize observability in representation learning through Platonic Projection Structures (PPS), an operator-theoretic framework for analyzing representation accessibility under partial observation. Rather than treating observable outputs as direct reflections of latent representations, PPS models observation through a self-adjoint positive semidefinite operator acting on a latent representation space. A system is represented as a triple (H,Π,O)(H, Π, O), where HH is a latent representation space, Π⪰0Π\succeq 0 is an observation operator, and O(v)=⟨v,Πv⟩O(v)=\langle v,Πv\rangle defines an induced scalar observable. Observability is characterized by the quotient geometry H/ker⁡(Π)H/\ker(Π), representing equivalence classes of latent states indistinguishable under observation. We show that quantum measurement and representation inference under linear observation models share this operator-theoretic structure while differing in the algebraic properties of their observation operators; the correspondence is structural rather than physical. Representation transfer and knowledge distillation can likewise be interpreted as approximate preservation of observable geometry through ΦΠT≈ΠSΦΦΠ_T \approx Π_S Φ. PPS also reveals a structural limitation of output-based interpretability: latent components in ker⁡(Π)\ker(Π) are inaccessible from induced observables, imposing intrinsic constraints on attribution and explanation methods. Controlled empirical validations demonstrate kernel-invariant observability, projection-induced attribution gaps, and rank-controlled observable geometry in latent representation spaces. PPS thus provides an explicit characterization of observability through operator-induced quotient geometry and a unified perspective on representation accessibility, interpretability, and projection-mediated inference.