cs.LGOct 6, 2026

Global Transport Couplings for Classifier-Free Guided Flows

Authors: Katarina Petrović, Zander W. Blasingame, Danyal Rehman, İsmail İlkan Ceylan, Michael Bronstein, Stephen Y. Zhang, Lazar Atanackovic, Alexander Tong

Organizations: AITHYRA · University of Oxford · Mila - Québec AI Institute · Université de Montréal · Massachusetts Institute of Technology · Technische Universität Wien · Flatiron Institute · University of Alberta · Alberta Machine Intelligence Institute · Canada CIFAR AI Chair

Abstract

Optimal-transport couplings have been shown to reduce training variance in unconditional flow models, but their role in conditional generation remains unclear. A natural approach constructs separate couplings for each condition, but this is impractical for large or continuous conditioning spaces found in modern image foundation models. We introduce Global Transport (GT), a global class-agnostic optimal-transport coupling, computed without class labels. GT can associate different conditions with different regions of the source noise, and consequently worsens performance without guidance. However, when combined with classifier-free guidance (CFG), GT consistently improves generation across domains, model scales, and sampling budgets. This reversal suggests that couplings for conditional flows should be evaluated both empirically and theoretically under the guided flow used at inference, rather than on unguided generation. We evaluate GT over both discrete class and continuous text conditioned image generation across model scales, and investigate how coupling choice alters guided trajectories. These results identify coupling design in the guided flow setting as a simple training time axis to improve performance without modifying existing architectures, samplers, or guidance mechanisms.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables19 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

Sep 21, 2026cs.CV

Classifier-Free Guidance in Flow Matching: Non-Autonomous Potentials, Overshoot, and Posterior-Mean Control

Classifier-free guidance (CFG) improves conditional generation in Flow Matching, but strong guidance can distort the generated distribution and reduce diversity. We provide a geometric account of this behavior by viewing Flow Matching as a time-varying gradient flow and characterizing how CFG reshapes its underlying potential. This view explains how stronger alignment can be accompanied by mean displacement and trajectory concentration, and motivates controlling guidance through the model-implied terminal posterior mean. We therefore propose Posterior-Mean-Capped CFG (PMC-CFG), a training-free, per-sample method that adaptively retains the strongest feasible guidance without additional network evaluations. Experiments on synthetic and large-scale image-generation benchmarks show that PMC-CFG limits guidance-induced distortion and concentration while improving the alignment--diversity trade-off, with particularly strong benefits when nominal guidance is large.
Jun 2, 2026cs.CV

Optimal Transport Flow Matching by Design

Flow matching models learn to transport samples from a simple prior distribution to a complex data distribution. When prior-data pairs are coupled via optimal transport (OT), the learned trajectories are straight and non-crossing, enabling fast, even single-step, generation. However, computing the OT coupling in high dimensions is intractable, and existing methods attempt to solve the OT problem, at the cost of persistent bias or significant overhead. Rather than solving for the OT coupling, we reformulate the problem. Once the prior is treated as a design choice rather than a fixed input, the OT coupling between prior and data is no longer unique. Many priors admit an OT-optimal identity coupling to the data, leaving us free to choose one that is also tractable to sample. We identify low-frequency projection of natural images as such a choice. The identity coupling between data and its low-frequency representation is empirically OT-optimal, the prior is structured enough to be sampled by a lightweight model at inference, and the remaining flow-matching task reduces to synthesizing high-frequency detail. Interpolating the prior with Gaussian noise further improves generation quality while preserving the OT coupling. The approach requires no modifications to the flow model itself, and integrates naturally with latent-space models, classifier-free guidance, and one-step generation frameworks. Across all benchmarks, our method reduces trajectory curvature by more than 2×2\times compared to existing flow matching methods, yielding better generation quality in the few-step regime.
Sep 16, 2026cs.CV

Beyond Random Couplings: Contrastive Noise Alignment in Generative Flows

Diffusion and flow-matching models are typically trained by corrupting data through independently sampled Gaussian noise. While simple and scalable, this forward process induces arbitrary data-noise couplings, forcing the network to learn high-curvature transports between unrelated endpoints. Existing optimal-transport methods reduce this burden by reassigning fixed noise samples to data, but the source noise distribution itself remains passive. To address this, we introduce Contrastive Noise Alignment (CNA), a training-time method that creates dynamic, contrastive couplings by optimizing the noise representations directly. By modeling the noise batch as an interacting particle system, CNA employs a cross-modal InfoNCE objective to align noise particles with their paired data targets. To prevent spatial collapse, this alignment is regularized using an angular entropy term and a radial norm penalty. We show theoretically that this equilibrium asymptotically preserves Gaussian structures, maintaining tractability during inference. Empirically, CNA improves the alignment between noise and data, reduces flow curvature, and provides better generation quality with fewer required sampling steps. For few-step, pixel-space generation (2-4 NFEs), CNA reduces FID by over 50% compared to standard rectified flow, and by at least 24% against Optimal Transport baselines.