We present Go2-DrivoR, a goal-conditioned adaptation of the end-to-end autonomous driving trajectory planning framework DrivoR for urban navigation with quadrupedal robots. By conditioning trajectory generation on a local-frame subgoal through a goal token and adapting the vehicle-centric scoring formulation, the method extends DrivoR to short-horizon goal-conditioned local planning without redesigning its core decoders. Specifically, we redefine drivable-area compliance for sidewalk-oriented navigation and reformulate the original ego progress term as goal-conditioned ego progress. Trained exclusively on TartanGround simulation data, Go2-DrivoR improves waypoint-conditioned planning performance on unseen simulation environments and transfers zero-shot to open-loop real-world trajectory prediction.
End-to-end planners for autonomous driving typically generate a set of candidate trajectories, score each one, and return the highest-scoring candidate. However, the scorer is applied only after the proposals are generated and cannot influence the set of trajectories: a weak set of candidates limits planning performance regardless of the scorer's quality. We instead treat the scorer as a learned trajectory-level reward function and search for trajectories that maximize it. Our method, TOAD, runs the Cross-Entropy Method at test time, warm-started from the planner's proposals. It requires no retraining and is plug-and-play for existing planners. Across six base planners, TOAD improves results on NAVSIM-v1 (94.7 PDMS), NAVSIM-v2 (56.3 EPDMS), and the closed-loop HUGSIM benchmark. The code will be made publicly available via the project page: https://valeoai.github.io/TOAD/.
Yihong Xu, Eloi Zablocki, Yuan Yin +4
valeo.ai, Paris, France · Sorbonne Universit´e, CNRS, ISIR, F-75005 Paris, France
End-to-end autonomous driving planners typically generate trajectories from current observations alone. However, real-world driving is highly dynamic, and such reactive planning cannot anticipate future scene evolution, often leading to myopic decisions and safety-critical failures. We propose ProDrive, a world-model-based proactive planning framework that enables ego-environment co-evolution for autonomous driving. ProDrive jointly trains a query-centric trajectory planner and a bird's-eye-view (BEV) world model end-to-end: the planner generates diverse candidate trajectories and planning-aware ego tokens, while the world model predicts future scene evolution conditioned on them. By injecting planner features into the world model and evaluating all candidates in parallel, ProDrive preserves end-to-end gradient flow and allows future outcome assessment to directly shape planning. This bidirectional coupling enables proactive planning beyond current-observation-driven decision-making. Experiments on NAVSIM v1 show that ProDrive outperforms strong baselines in both safety and planning efficiency, while ablations validate the effectiveness of the proposed ego-environment coupling design.
Chuyao Fu, Shengzhe Gan, Zhuoli Ouyang +5
1Southern University of Science and Technology · 2Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Reinforcement learning is promising for autonomous urban driving, but long-horizon goal-directed navigation asks a policy to acquire several competing behaviors at once--reaching a distant goal, tracking a route, avoiding obstacles, obeying signals--and a fixed objective gives no order in which to learn them. This paper presents CORAL, which advances two schedules together: a five-stage curriculum that progressively lengthens routes and tightens behavioral constraints, and a stage-aware reward whose component weights shift emphasis from mission progress toward route following, safety, smoothness, and rule compliance as the task hardens. The policy is a multi-stream actor-critic network trained with Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) in CARLA on a compact 99-dimensional state pairing a polar LiDAR histogram with vehicle telemetry, ego-frame route geometry, and traffic-rule indicators--no point-cloud encoder, no bird's-eye-view rasterization. Against two PPO baselines under an identical protocol, CORAL reaches the goal in all twenty evaluation episodes on the longest routes under the full set of behavioral constraints, where the baselines reach 5% and 10%; a factorial ablation shows that neither schedule alone matches their combination: removing either lowers both success and route completion, and disabling both drops success to 55%. Trained in one town, the policy transfers zero-shot to seven unseen towns, succeeding in 68-98% of episodes on routes of the same 100-150 m length, with mean lateral deviation below 0.35 m.