Organizations: The University of Osaka Osaka, Japan · Alibaba Inc Hangzhou, China · Nagoya University Nagoya, Japan · Tokyo University of Science Tokyo, Japan
The spread of fake news may cause severe social consequences. Existing fake news detection methods mainly focus on stylistic variations or incorporate external information such as explanations. However, news articles are often rewritten under different emotional backgrounds while preserving their underlying factual claims, which may affect the robustness of detection models. In this work, we investigate fake news detec- tion under fact-preserving emotional variations. To study this problem, we construct emotion-rewritten test sets and generate explanations from the original news articles as stable background knowledge. We then propose a Gated Cross Attention (GCA) framework that adaptively integrates emotionally rewritten news with the corresponding explanations, enabling the model to focus on informative explanation content while reducing potential mismatches caused by emotional reframing. Experiments on PolitiFact, GossipCop, and LUN demonstrate that the proposed method achieves notable improvements under multiple emotional conditions on PolitiFact and LUN, while maintaining competitive performance on GossipCop. We further analyze the effects of explanation guidance and gating mechanisms under different emotional conditions. Our code and data are available at: https://github.com/Flulike/fakenews gca .
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Overview of fake news detection framework under different emotional backgrounds. Red text indicates emotion-related modifications introduced during rewriting.
Dataset
Training
Test
Total
True
Fake
Total
True
Fake
PolitiFact
360
180
180
90
45
45
GossipCop
6,332
3,166
3,166
1,584
792
792
LUN
6,000
3,000
3,000
1,500
750
750
TABLE I: Statistics of the benchmark datasets used in this work. The three datasets cover different data scales, providing a comprehensive evaluation under multiple emotional rewriting settings.
Fig. 2: Overview of the proposed Gated Cross Attention (GCA) framework. The original article, one reliable rewriting, one unreliable rewriting, and explanation generated from the original article are encoded independently. GCA adaptively integrates explanation-aware contextual information to detect fake news.
PolitiFact
GossipCop
LUN
Method
Orig
Joy
Anger
Sad
Happy
Orig
Joy
Anger
Sad
Happy
Orig
Joy
Anger
Sad
Happy
Accuracy
ENDEF
88.89
73.33
82.22
80.00
73.33
67.99
63.13
68.50
66.35
61.81
77.67
76.13
73.40
75.13
75.73
ARG
85.56
69.44
74.44
73.33
70.00
73.23
69.67
66.79
68.75
69.88
85.40
78.50
78.93
80.00
80.10
Sheepdog
88.77
76.11
84.22
79.89
71.67
75.89
75.11
75.95
76.03
74.66
92.61
85.90
88.43
86.71
87.41
Ours
90.56
77.11
83.56
81.11
75.56
76.72
76.29
75.38
76.10
76.18
93.96
87.29
90.01
88.20
88.55
TABLE II: Experimental results of our method on the three benchmark datasets (in % ). Accuracy and F1 score are reported under the original news setting as well as different emotional rewriting conditions.
PolitiFact
GossipCop
LUN
Method
Joy
Anger
Sad
Happy
Joy
Anger
Sad
Happy
Joy
Anger
Sad
Happy
Accuracy
with BERT
76.56
80.11
79.44
75.44
75.42
75.04
75.70
74.99
85.20
85.61
86.07
85.49
w/o Lcon
76.11
82.29
81.11
75.05
74.85
75.68
75.87
74.99
86.40
89.93
88.10
88.33
w/o Gate
77.78
80.00
76.22
73.33
75.51
75.63
75.82
76.12
83.27
84.93
86.14
84.27
Ours
77.11
83.56
80.11
75.56
76.29
75.38
76.10
76.18
87.29
90.01
88.20
88.55
TABLE III: Ablation study results of our method on three datasets (in % ). Note that removing the gating mechanism also disables Lcon , since the contrastive loss is computed from gated representations.
Fig. 3: Gating values for real and fake news on GossipCop (a, b) and LUN (c, d) test sets. The left column shows token-level gating distributions, while the right column presents the mean gating value for each news sample.
To efficiently combat the spread of LLM-generated misinformation in the news domain, we present RADAR, a Retrieval-Augmented Detector with Adversarial Refinement for adaptive LLM-generated fake news detection. Our approach employs a generator that rewrites real articles with factual perturbations, paired with a lightweight detector that verifies claims using dense passage retrieval. To enable effective co-evolution, we introduce Verbal Adversarial Feedback (VAF). Rather than relying on scalar rewards, VAF issues structured natural-language critiques; these guide the generator toward more sophisticated evasion attempts, compelling the detector to adapt and improve. Experiments on an LLM-generated fake news benchmark show that RADAR outperforms retrieval-augmented trainable baselines and general-purpose LLMs with retrieval. Further analysis shows that retrieval on both the generator and detector sides improves performance, while VAF and few-shot demonstrations offer complementary benefits. RADAR also transfers better to fake news generated by an unseen external attacker, suggesting improved generalization beyond the specific co-evolved generator used during training.
Propagation structures provide crucial evidence for fake news detection, yet existing approaches primarily rely on supervised GNN-based models, which require substantial labeled data and exhibit limited generalization. Although large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong reasoning capabilities, directly feeding them raw propagation graphs creates a significant modality mismatch and severe information overload, making structure-aware reasoning unreliable in zero-shot and few-shot settings. To bridge this gap, we propose MAGER, a multi-agent genetic evolution framework that automatically discovers meta-paths optimized for LLM reasoning. By compressing complex propagation graphs into informative subgraphs, the evolved meta-paths alleviate both information overload and modality mismatch, enabling frozen LLMs to perform structure-aware veracity reasoning. We further introduce a graph in-context learning strategy that retrieves semantically and structurally similar demonstrations to strengthen classification and reasoning. Extensive experiments show that MAGER substantially improves frozen LLMs as standalone fake news detectors in data-efficient settings. Our code is available at https://github.com/SenticNet/MAGER.
Ziyi Zhou, Xiaoming Zhang, Hui Pang +5
Beihang University Beijing, China · Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing, China · Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications Beijing, China +2
In recent years, multimodal multidomain fake news detection has garnered increasing attention. Nevertheless, this direction presents two significant challenges: (1) Failure to Capture Cross-Instance Narrative Consistency: existing models usually evaluate each news in isolation, fail to capture cross-instance narrative consistency, and thus struggle to address the spread of cluster based fake news driven by social media; (2) Lack of Domain Specific Knowledge for Reasoning: conventional models, which rely solely on knowledge encoded in their parameters during training, struggle to generalize to new or data-scarce domains (e.g., emerging events or niche topics). To tackle these challenges, we introduce Retrieval-Augmented Multimodal Model for Fake News Detection (RAMM). First, RAMM employs a Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) as its backbone to capture cross-modal semantic information from news samples. Second, RAMM incorporates an Abstract Narrative Alignment Module. This component adaptively extracts abstract narrative consistency from diverse instances across distinct domains, aggregates relevant knowledge, and thereby enables the modeling of high-level narrative information. Finally, RAMM introduces a Semantic Representation Alignment Module, which aligns the model's decision-making paradigm with that of humans - specifically, it shifts the model's reasoning process from direct inference on multimodal features to an instance-based analogical reasoning process. Extensive experimental results on three public datasets validate the efficacy of our proposed approach. Our code is available at the following link: https://github.com/li-yiheng/RAMM
Yiheng Li, Weihai Lu, Hanyi Yu +1
University of International Business and Economics · Beijing, China · Peking University +4