Beyond Group Splits: Specimen-Level Cross-Validation and Visual Attribution for Remaining-Shelf-Life Regression in Climacteric Fruit

Multimodal product retrieval (MPR) underpins checkout-free retail and automated inventory systems, yet it demands fine-grained SKU discrimination that standard vision-language benchmarks fail to capture. We present the first systematic zero-shot evaluation of 190 open-source VLMs on the MPR task of the GroceryVision Challenge, isolating pre-training data, architecture, and input resolution. Our analysis yields three actionable findings. \textbf{(1) Data quality trumps scale.} Switching from raw web-scrapes to filtered datasets delivers up to 16.6% accuracy gains, exceeding the benefit of doubling model parameters. \textbf{(2) Efficient models can win.} MobileCLIP-B (150M parameters) outperforms 351M counterparts trained on noisy data. We introduce \textit{semantic power density} ($φ$), an efficiency metric that penalizes sub-threshold accuracy. \textbf{(3) A precision gap persists.} State-of-the-art models achieve 94.5% Recall@5 but suffer a 17.5% drop at Recall@1, revealing that contrastive embeddings cluster categories effectively but fail to rank visually similar SKUs. Code and evaluation scripts are available at https://github.com/upeee/openmpr.

Blind image quality assessment (BIQA) predicts perceived image quality without access to a pristine reference and is fundamental to applications such as image compression, transmission, and restoration. Recent BIQA methods increasingly rely on large vision-language models (VLMs). Although frozen VLMs provide an efficient alternative to computationally expensive full fine-tuning, it remains unclear how much performance is sacrificed by not adapting the backbone and, more importantly, under what conditions such adaptation is truly beneficial. Answering this question, however, is complicated by the widespread use of image-level splitting on synthetic-distortion benchmarks, where distorted versions of the same reference image can appear in both training and test partitions. This content overlap artificially inflates the apparent performance of frozen representations, masking their true generalization ability and potentially leading to incorrect conclusions about the value of backbone adaptation. We therefore address these two issues jointly. We develop an efficient BIQA framework that fuses a natural-scene-statistics descriptor with frozen SigLIP and CLIP-H embeddings through a lightweight regression head, and then apply parameter-efficient Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) to the SigLIP backbone, training only $0.23\%$ of its parameters. Evaluating both frozen and adapted models across six datasets under image-level and reference-level protocols, we find that image-level splitting inflates frozen-feature SROCC by up to $0.44$ and masks wide variation in true difficulty, which reference-level evaluation reveals. Under this content-independent protocol, LoRA adaptation recovers performance in proportion to the exposed difficulty, with the largest gains where frozen features generalize poorly (up to $+0.357$ SROCC on TID2013) and little benefit where they are already strong.

Non-destructive food quality assessment has increasingly benefited from hyperspectral imaging (HSI), which captures spectral signatures linked to biochemical changes during storage. Estimating day-wise freshness, however, remains challenging owing to strong inter-fillet variability and scarce labelled data per product. All existing deep learning approaches for HSI-based freshness prediction operate under full supervision, requiring densely annotated training sets that are costly to obtain at the individual-product level. We introduce, to the best of our knowledge, the first few-shot learning framework for HSI-based food quality estimation. Each fillet defines a distinct episodic task, and a CORAL-style ordinal prediction head captures the ranked nature of freshness progression through cumulative threshold modelling. Biologically grounded monotonicity and embedding smoothness constraints further guide predictions toward plausible trajectories. On a 16-day salmon HSI dataset under a strict unseen-fillet protocol, our method achieves a mean absolute error of 1.58 days and 2-day accuracy of 72.3% with only three labelled days per fillet, substantially outperforming scalar regression and label-distribution baselines under an identical unseen-fillet protocol.