Evolutionary Architecture Search for Chlorophyll-$a$ Prediction in Lakes using Sentinel-2

Coastal algal bloom monitoring requires frequent, spatially detailed, and globally consistent observations, provided by Landsat-8/9 and Sentinel-2 A/B/C. Together, these missions offer over a decade of medium-resolution multispectral imagery with near-global coverage every 2-3 days, enabling the detection of fragmented bloom structures not resolvable by coarse ocean-color sensors. However, their use in aquatic environments remains challenging due to limited spectral coverage and a lack of harmonized reflectance products. As an alternative to traditional bio-optical methods, deep learning-based image classification offers a data-driven approach that can overcome many of these limitations. This study presents the first successful implementation of vision transformer-based coastal algal bloom mapping using 30-m Landsat-Sentinel-2 images. A globally distributed bloom patch dataset was generated across bloom-prone coastal hotspots worldwide. Four transformer-based architectures were compared against a standard convolutional baseline for fine-scale bloom detection, and assessed under different optical water types and atmospheric and surface conditions. All deep learning models showed strong capabilities in detecting floating bloom areas, with omission and commission errors of 8-65%. Under cloud and glint stress in a time series, the Swin Transformer outperformed traditional spectral-index approaches, which produced widespread false positives, effectively avoiding cloud- and glint-affected pixels. Comparisons with MODIS-derived products further highlighted the benefits of higher spatial resolution in detecting fragmented and irregularly affected blooms. Our findings support deep learning as a reliable tool for medium-resolution, consistent monitoring of floating algal blooms in dynamic coastal environments.

Low-cost NAS must both explore high-performing architectures and identify them reliably, yet reducing evaluation cost often weakens the fidelity of candidate comparisons. Training-free methods reduce evaluation cost by replacing learned task feedback with proxy signals measured at initialization. We introduce LESS (Lightweight Evolutionary Supernet Search), a data-driven method that combines a brief fair hard-path warm-up with discrete search under a single CMA-ES distribution. Each proposal is evaluated as its decoded hard genotype after six candidate-conditioned supernet updates. On NAS-Bench-201, LESS achieves $93.189\pm0.467\%$ CIFAR-10 test accuracy in 409.1 seconds, coming within 0.04 percentage points of FairNAS using approximately $1/24$ of its source-reported search time. Matched controls show that calibration improves selected validation accuracy by $0.577$ percentage points while changing best-visited accuracy by only $0.054$ points, indicating that its primary effect is to reduce selection regret. The frozen configuration transfers without tuning to CIFAR-100 and ImageNet16-120 with $69.615\pm1.139\%$ and $43.720\pm1.697\%$ accuracy. Applied without tuning to the larger DARTS space, LESS achieves $96.95\pm0.14\%$ on CIFAR-10 and $82.43\pm0.80\%$ on CIFAR-100, with each search completing in approximately 43.5 minutes on a single GPU. Together, these results show that short, balanced, data-dependent updates enable competitive neural architecture search across datasets and search spaces within minutes.

I propose the \emph{Random Cloud} method, a training-free approach to neural architecture search that discovers minimal feedforward network topologies through stochastic exploration and progressive structural reduction. Unlike post-training pruning methods that require a full train-prune-retrain cycle, this method evaluates randomly initialized networks without backpropagation, progressively reduces their topology, and only trains the best minimal candidate at the end. I evaluate on 7 classification benchmarks against magnitude pruning and random pruning baselines. The Random Cloud matches or outperforms both baselines in 6 of 7 datasets, achieving statistically significant improvements on Sonar ($+4.9$pp accuracy, $p{=}0.017$ vs magnitude pruning) with 87% parameter reduction. Crucially, the method is faster than both pruning baselines in 4 of 5 datasets (0.67--0.94$\times$ the cost of full training), since it avoids training the full-size network entirely.