Recent multimodal large language models (MLLMs) increasingly incorporate explainable reasoning for emotion understanding. However, reasoning based mainly on observable affective cues can reduce emotion understanding to superficial cue-label associations, giving rise to the Clever Hans effect. Such shortcuts become unreliable when affective cues are implicit, conflicting across modalities, linguistically misleading, or obscured by redundant details. In contrast, human emotions are shaped by how individuals interpret and evaluate surrounding events beyond observable cues. Inspired by appraisal theories of emotion, we formulate multimodal emotion understanding as a progression from perception to cognitive appraisal, and introduce a dataset, a model, and a benchmark to support this novel paradigm. CogEmo-40K is a large-scale instruction-tuning dataset constructed through a perception-to-appraisal pipeline to elicit evidence-grounded reasoning across six cognitive appraisal dimensions underlying emotion. CogEmo-MoE is a compact sparse MLLM that introduces interleaved MoE blocks for appraisal-specific adaptation, enabling effective appraisal reasoning at a substantially smaller scale than typical emotion MLLMs. CogEmo-Bench introduces an Appraisal Evidence Quality Score (AEQS) to assess cognitive-affective understanding across six complementary appraisal dimensions, addressing the limitation of conventional emotion metrics that evaluate what emotion is predicted but not why it arises. Extensive experiments show that our paradigm not only leads CogEmo-Bench, but also exhibits strong cross-domain generalization. Our findings suggest that perception-to-appraisal reasoning can move beyond surface-level cue-label associations toward more reliable multimodal emotion understanding and closer cognitive alignment between MLLMs and humans.
Emotion understanding is a core capability for LLMs to interact effectively with humans, yet existing evaluation paradigms rely on discrete emotion label prediction and fail to capture the cognitive processes underlying emotion generation. Grounded in appraisal theory, we introduce CAREBench, the first benchmark with complete inferential chain annotations from both first- and third-person perspectives on real-world narratives, spanning appraisal reasoning, appraisal ratings, and multi-label emotion annotation. We propose a process-level evaluation framework and conduct systematic experiments across six LLMs organized around four research questions. We find that stronger models match or surpass human observers on certain tasks, yet fall short on appraisal reasoning and positive emotion recognition; performance across chain steps and sensitivity to appraisal interventions exhibit dissociations across models; and current models have not internalized the mechanisms needed to capture human subjective heterogeneity. These findings suggest that downstream emotion prediction metrics may overestimate LLMs' true emotion understanding, and CAREBench provides a foundation for more diagnostically informative evaluation of LLMs' affective cognitive capabilities.
Zhaoyue Sun, Hainiu Xu, Andero Uusberg +3
Department of Informatics King’s College London · Institute of Psychology University of Tartu · Department of Psychology Stanford University +1
While multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated exceptional capabilities in objective understanding tasks, their performance in affective reasoning still falls significantly short of human standards. We attribute it to a central capability gap: MLLMs are difficult to reliably distinguish semantically proximal emotions based on fine-grained visual evidence, which could be decoupled as two limitations: 1) Insufficient Attribution. The global reasoning paradigm of conventional MLLMs severely dilutes fine-grained emotion cues, where subtle emotional states are usually implicitly encoded, thereby generating emotional misjudgments in complex scenarios. 2) Insufficient Discrimination. Existing methods could only identify regions generally associated with emotions, which fails to distinguish discriminative regions between semantically similar emotions, leading to ambiguous emotion judgements. To overcome these limitations, we present a training-free inference-time optimization framework, named Decoding Affective Nuances (DAN). Specifically, we propose a Hierarchical Emotional Reasoning Chain (HERC) that enhances the insufficient attribution by harmonizing fine-grained scene/object-level cues and performing a soft-gated reasoning. Furthermore, to discriminate between semantically proximal emotions, we design a Contrastive Discriminative Visual Pruning (CDVP), which isolates discriminative visual tokens to reason the final emotion category by computing the absolute discrepancy between the attention distributions of similar emotions. Performances on several benchmarks demonstrate that DAN significantly improves discrimination for affective nuances without consuming additional training resources, especially achieving +10.47% improvements with Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct on WebEmo25 dataset that contains 25 fine-grained emotion categories.
Cheng Ye, Weidong Chen, Zhaobo Qi +2
University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei · Harbin Institute of Technology, Weihai
Visual emotion understanding requires models not only to recognize emotional states, but also to why they arise and perform higher-level cognitive reasoning. However, existing benchmarks mainly focus on emotion recognition, offering limited support for grounded understanding and response-oriented analysis. To address this gap, we introduce \textbf{InsightVQA}, a large-scale dataset for hierarchical visual question answering on emotion understanding and cognitive reasoning. Building from 351K images collected from six public sources, we apply a rigorous multi-stage filtering pipeline to curate 138K high-confidence images. Each image is annotated at three hierarchical levels: perception QA for emotion and valence recognition, grounded understanding QA constructed from visual trigger extraction through constraint-guided generation, and cognition QA centered on response intent prediction and sequential insight reasoning. In total, InsightVQA contains 725K QA pairs. We further present \textbf{InsightVQA-Bench}, a high-quality evaluation benchmark comprising 30K samples for fine-grained evaluation. To support evaluation, we introduce \textbf{InsightNet}, an emotion-tuned baseline for MLLMs. Results demonstrate that InsightVQA poses significant challenges for grounded emotion understanding and reasoning.