Credit Attribution in Timestamped Soccer Networks Using Multivariate Hawkes Processes

Dense pass surfaces give, for every pitch cell, whether a pass played there would arrive, whether the carrier would choose it, and what the possession would then be worth. The networks that draw them read the state as a raster of per-cell counts, losing where inside a cell each player stands. LiDAR detectors, bird's-eye-view perception and graph weather models move entity features onto a grid, binning each entity to a cell or learning the transfer. We evaluate the interpolated form: each player's features are scattered bilinearly onto the grid at the player's measured coordinates, so the surface loss trains the per-player encoder end to end. Those systems adopt an interface; this paper measures one. On 53,628 passes from the 2022 World Cup, painting improves selection likelihood over the same core fed rasters alone by about a quarter of a nat: in every match of an eight-fold cross-validation, with every arm tuned over five seeds, and after retraining on seven Bundesliga and 2. Bundesliga matches from another provider. Thirteen pre-specified studies locate the gain: painting the nine raw player features with no encoder carries three quarters of it, and the learned encoder and message passing add a smaller, resolved increment. Painting also helps the original SoccerMap and a canonical U-Net, whereas offset channels, a finer raster, an attention painter and a raster-free decoder do not. Frozen across the provider boundary the likelihood advantage is lost; injected tracking error compresses it. These results concern observed-endpoint prediction, not calibrated evaluation of hypothetical passes.

The defensive performance of football players is commonly measured through a limited number of actions like tackles and interceptions while their continuous impact through positional behaviour has hardly been studied before. We formulate this problem as an attribution over multi-agent spatiotemporal trajectories without player-level ground truth labels, where event-level changes of expected threat are distributed among individuals. We propose a framework that performs this attribution using player involvement scores calculated from defensive pressure areas (DPAs). By computing role-conditioned baselines within automatically detected team structures, we can determine each defender's expected responsibility for threat created through arbitrary passes. The validity and robustness of this approach are evaluated on a uniquely extensive cross-gender and cross-competition data set, including positional and event data from 64 matches of the men's World Cup, 116 matches of the women's German Bundesliga and 336 matches of the men's German 3. Liga. In the absence of a ground truth, we propose an evaluation protocol that combines multiple relatively weak proxies into robust summary scores. We find a validity score that is improved by around 1 standard deviation compared to the best action-based metric and demonstrate that many popular measures show limited validity. The "blame" for conceding high-value actions shows especially strong correlations with external ratings and market values, making it the first published metric in football to reliably measure positioning errors. All code underlying this work is publicly available to support reproducibility and further research.

We describe our system for the SoccerNet 2026 Player-Centric Ball-Action Spotting Challenge, which requires predicting who performs which action and when, across eight classes in broadcast soccer. Building on the three FOOTPASS baselines [1] (TAAD, TAAD+GNN, and TAAD+DST), we contribute four extensions: (1) gradient check pointing to enable full-backbone fine-tuning on a single GPU; (2) fusion of GNN logits into the DST encoder, combining graph-based tactical context with per-player visual features; (3) square-root frequency class weighting to address the 213:1 pass-to-tackle imbalance in the training data; and (4) a post processing pipeline comprising per-class logit gating, temporal frame refinement, jersey re-assignment, and a two-model ensemble. Our system achieves 0.548 Macro F1 on the test set and 0.446 on the challenge set (server evaluation).