Studying Comics at Scale with Artificial Intelligence: The PAGE Framework and Three Studies of American Comics and Japanese Manga
Organizations: Thomas Lord Department of Computer Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Abstract
Comics are one of the great visual records of the twentieth century: hundreds of thousands of pages in which a mass readership saw its leaders, its wars and its heroes. Most of this record has never been studied as a whole; comics scholarship proceeds one book at a time. We argue that artificial intelligence, including generative models, can change this to the benefit of the medium itself. We propose PAGE, a framework that makes artificial intelligence an instrument for comics research. It parses every scan into panels, text and a bibliographic record; annotates each page with a vision-language model that follows a written codebook, as a human coder would; grounds samples of these readings in human annotation; and explains change across an archive, with estimates controlled for publisher and genre. We demonstrate the framework on 3,929 American comic books (1938--1956) and 87 volumes of Japanese manga, in three studies, each resting on a different capability. The first pairs text search with visual reading to recover how a mass medium portrayed political power. The second measures the page's visual form across an industry and recovers the hand of individual artists. The third follows who speaks across two comics traditions, checked against human annotation. Beyond research, the same instruments can make archives searchable by what is drawn, open comics to blind and low-vision readers, and help preserve fragile collections and credit uncredited artists. We outline a research agenda in which artificial intelligence strengthens the study, preservation and reach of the medium.
Figures & tables
| Step | Task | Technique and example tools | Use in this paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parse | Panels and text boxes | Object detection (Faster R-CNN ( Ren et al., 2017 ) ); joint panel, text and character detection ( Sachdeva and Zisserman, 2024 ) | Panel detector trained on Manga109-s; COMICS release boxes |
| Lettering | OCR; on-device text recognition; transcription models ( Sachdeva and Zisserman, 2024 ) | COMICS OCR; cover dates | |
| Bibliographic records | Text recognition on covers and indicia; record linkage to the GCD ( Grand Comics Database, 2026 ) | Dates for 77% of comics; GCD publisher, genre, penciller | |
| Duplicate scans | Perceptual hashing with close inspection | Duplicates among the Study 1 comics | |
| Annotate | Page content under a codebook | Vision-language model reading the page image and extracted text | Presidents, speakers, roles, character gender |
| Visual similarity | Image embeddings (CLIP ( Radford et al., 2021 ) ) | Retrieval, artist matching, cover genre |
| Study | Check | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Data | Cover-date OCR rule vs vision-model reading of indicia | 139/146 exact |
| GCD issue match on known titles | 72% exact | |
| Manga panel detector vs hand-drawn frames (human) | F1 0.97 | |
| Page | Cover genre classifier vs GCD genres (human), cross-validated | 70% (majority 27%) |
| Penciller matching vs GCD credits (human), other series, reprints excluded | 2.4% vs 1.5% | |
| Speakers | Character gender, names withheld, vs gender-named characters (human) | 95.5%, |
Appendix figures & tables6 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.