Cross-Protocol Personality Assessment with LLMs: Aligning Behavioral Evidence with Human Ratings

Personality recognition in asynchronous video interviews (AVIs) has become increasingly important due to their widespread adoption in modern recruitment. Existing approaches often rely on large language models (LLMs) to analyze textual responses of interviewees in AVI. However, unimodel methods often suffer from information loss (e.g., ignore facial cues). In contrast, multimodal methods that employ full-face images or sparsely sampled frames can discard fine-grained temporal dynamics critical for accurate personality assessment. To overcome these limitations, we propose an LLM-based framework that semantically fuse facial action units (AUs) with textual responses of AVI. AU sequences are first converted into interpretable textual descriptions, which are then fused with participants' textual responses through an LLM. A lightweight regression head transforms the resulting embeddings into continuous personality scores without disrupting the underlying semantic space. Experiments on the AVI-6 benchmark demonstrate consistent improvements over most baselines, with lower prediction errors and stronger correlations with human-rated scores across multiple traits. Further analysis reveals that AU-derived semantic representations offer complementary non-verbal cues to textual responses. Decoupling semantic understanding from regression prediction within the LLM also leads to greater training stability and clearer interpretability. Overall, these findings demonstrate that AU-text fusion provides a psychologically grounded and computationally efficient framework for personality recognition in AVIs.

Simulating real personalities with large language models requires grounding generation in authentic personal data. Existing evaluation approaches rely on demographic surveys, personality questionnaires, or short AI-led interviews as proxies, but lack direct assessment against what individuals actually said. We address this gap with an interview-grounded evaluation framework for personality simulation at a large scale. We extract over 671,000 question-answer pairs from 23,000 verified interview transcripts across 1,000 public personalities, each with an average of 11.5 hours of interview content. We propose a multi-dimensional evaluation framework with four complementary metrics measuring content similarity, factual consistency, personality alignment, and factual knowledge retention. Through systematic comparison, we find that interview grounding yields consistent gains in content alignment and exact-match factual recall over biographical profiles and parametric prompting. We further find complementary strengths: retrieval-augmented methods tend to preserve personality alignment, while larger chronological contexts generally reduce contradictions and improve factual recall. Our evaluation framework enables principled method selection based on application requirements, and our empirical findings provide actionable insights for advancing personality simulation research.

Predicting psychological traits from asynchronous video interviews (AVIs) is a challenging problem in AI-assisted interview assessment because labeled datasets are limited while each response contains high-dimensional visual, acoustic, and verbal signals. This paper presents our solution for the ACM Multimedia AVI Challenge 2026, which evaluates two tasks: Track1 predicts self-reported HEXACO personality traits from personality-related interview responses, and Track2 classifies cognitive ability levels from structured AVI responses. We treat the problem as a small-sample representation learning task. Instead of fine-tuning large pretrained models, we use frozen multimodal encoders, including CLIP for visual features, Whisper for acoustic features and transcripts, and RoBERTa, E5, and DeBERTaV3 for textual representations, followed by low-capacity downstream models. For Track1, our trait-specific regression and late-fusion system achieves an average validation MSE of 0.2696, improving over the official baseline of 0.3334. Ablation results show a three-step improvement from a global model (0.3189), to per-trait modeling (0.2871), to per-trait late fusion (0.2696), corresponding to a 19.1% relative MSE reduction over the official baseline. For Track2, a compact subject-attribute baseline reaches 0.5781 accuracy, while our multimodal ensemble reaches 0.5313, both above the official baseline of 0.4062. We interpret this result as evidence of possible subject-attribute shortcuts in the validation split rather than robust cognitive inference from AVI content. Overall, our findings suggest that AVI-based psychological assessment benefits from trait-specific multimodal modeling, but cognitive ability prediction requires careful control of dataset shortcuts.