math.OCOct 12, 2026

Calibrated αα-Barycenters for Multiobjective ff-Divergence Optimization

Authors: Dier Tang, Peijie Li, Xiaoyuan Zhang

Organizations: The University of Hong Kong · Zhongguancun Academy

Abstract

Matching one distribution to many targets can require repeated evaluations of every target. CAL-αα-MODM aggregates a nonlinear predictor into one barycenter, calibrates its residual derivatives, and checks steps against the original ff-divergence objective. Under smoothness assumptions, calibration controls parameter-step model error without requiring targets to be close to the model. Exact-oracle stationarity and local convergence guarantees are established. At common matching, canonical geometry cancels the leading quadratic iteration error, giving cubic convergence with second-order calibration and sufficiently accurate inner solves. High-precision experiments support this prediction. Sensitivity-based initialization also accelerates preference continuation along regular stationary branches. On 300-target Jensen--Shannon problems, CAL-p2 achieves median paired speedups of 3.15×3.15\times over L-BFGS and 1.10×1.10\times over second-order Direct-TR, across 23/25 and 24/25 objective-comparable stationary pairs. The savings arise when cheaper predictor queries offset calibration overhead.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables26 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

Mar 23, 2026

Calibeating Made Simple

We study calibeating, the problem of post-processing external forecasts online to minimize cumulative losses and match an informativeness-based benchmark. Unlike prior work, which analyzed calibeating for specific losses with specific arguments, we reduce calibeating to existing online learning techniques and obtain results for general proper losses. More concretely, we first show that calibeating is minimax-equivalent to regret minimization. This recovers the O(log⁡T)O(\log T) calibeating rate of Foster and Hart [FH23] for the Brier and log losses and its optimality, and yields new optimal calibeating rates for mixable losses and general bounded losses. Second, we prove that multi-calibeating is minimax-equivalent to the combination of calibeating and the classical expert problem. This yields new optimal multi-calibeating rates for mixable losses, including Brier and log losses, and general bounded losses. Finally, we obtain new bounds for achieving calibeating and calibration simultaneously for the Brier loss. For binary predictions, our result gives the first calibrated algorithm that at the same time also achieves the optimal O(log⁡T)O(\log T) calibeating rate.
Oct 6, 2026

High-dimensional online calibration from harmonic weights

We study the online calibration of multidimensional forecasts over an arbitrary convex set Y⊆RdY\subseteq\mathbb{R}^d relative to an arbitrary error norm ∥⋅∥L\|\cdot\|_{L}. For forecasting dd binary outcomes simultaneously (Y=[0,1]dY=[0,1]^d), we give the first algorithm that achieves ε\varepsilon-calibration in a number of rounds that is polynomial in dd for every fixed accuracy. It requires dO(1/ε)d^{O(1/\varepsilon)} rounds, exponentially improving the dimension dependence of previous bounds. For multi-class forecasting (Y=ΔdY=Δ_d), we obtain the same dO(1/ε)d^{O(1/\varepsilon)} rate, improving the dO~(1/ε2)d^{\widetilde{O}(1/\varepsilon^2)} bounds of Peng and Fishelson et al. Our algorithm is simple: on each round, it outputs a harmonically weighted distribution over harmonically smoothed past outcomes. The same algorithm works for every forecast set and norm. More generally, it achieves ε\varepsilon-calibration after exp⁡(O(γ(Y,L)/ε))\exp(O(γ(Y,L)/\varepsilon)) rounds, where γ(Y,L)γ(Y,L) is a geometric parameter defined by a matrix discrepancy problem. The harmonic weights are motivated by the fact that the discrete Hilbert transform matrix achieves the optimal discrepancy up to a universal constant, simultaneously for every LL. This optimality result may be of independent interest.
Oct 7, 2026

Coefficient Calibration as Selection Pressure in Symbolic Regression

In memetic symbolic regression, candidate structures are compared after coefficient calibration, so the calibration protocol itself contributes to evolutionary selection. Standard centralized calibration evaluates each structure at its pooled-sample optimum, ignoring how stable this calibration is under covariate shifts, and can thus favor structures whose fit relies on sample-specific coefficients. We propose Dirichlet-Sinkhorn Constant Averaging (DSCA), a calibration strategy that partitions the optimization data into equally sized subsets with different covariate distributions, calibrates each candidate independently on every partition, and evaluates it at the mean of the resulting parameters. We show that the excess loss of DSCA relative to centralized calibration vanishes at the population level for correctly specified, identifiable expressions, whereas under misspecification it persists when partition-specific calibrations do not aggregate to the pooled optimum. On synthetic benchmarks and ten real-world datasets, DSCA improves functional recovery and the accuracy-complexity trade-off over centralized Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno and Levenberg-Marquardt calibration, under selection by negative log-likelihood and by the Akaike and Bayesian information criteria. Mechanism analyses associate the DSCA excess loss with the generalization gap and show that the effect is not reproduced by repeated centralized fitting. These results indicate that controlled heterogeneous calibration provides a complementary source of selection pressure in symbolic-regression search.