cs.LGOct 12, 2026

Effect of Spherical Parameter Space on Number of Non-Forgetting Tasks and Capacity of Continual Learning

Authors: Nazanin Mirhosseini

Organizations: Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Co, USA

Abstract

We propose a continuous learning formulation for TT non-forgetting tasks with the spherical parameter space Sd−1(d)\mathbb{S}^{d-1}(\sqrt{d}) in asymptotic regime d→∞d\rightarrow \infty. Each task ii has an optimum Θi\bmΘ_i, minimizing its corresponding loss function Ri(w)R_i(\bm{w}) on sphere. We reduce each task ii to an acceptable loss region modeled by a geodesic ball BΘi(ri(d))B_{\bmΘ_i}(r_i(d)) on Sd−1(d)\mathbb{S}^{d-1}(\sqrt{d}) centered at Θi\bmΘ_i with radius ri(d)r_i(d). To model task dependencies (similarities), task optima Θi\bmΘ_i are distributed by a Neyman-Scott clustered point process ΦΦ. Cluster centers {Yj}j=1Np\{\bm{Y}_j\}_{j=1}^{N_p} form a homogeneous Poisson point process on sphere, while intra-cluster task optima follow a von Mises-Fisher distribution with mean Yj\bm{Y}_j and concentration κκ. Each task t∈{1,...,T}t\in \{1, ..., T\} learning algorithm is considered to be a channel Qt(dwt∣wt−1,Kt−1(θ1:t−1),θt)Q_{t}(\mathrm{d}\bm{w}_t | \bm{w}_{t-1}, \mathcal{K}_{t-1}(\bmθ_{1:t-1}), \bmθ_t), where Wt\bm{W}_t is the learned parameter of task tt and Kt−1(Θ1:t−1)=⋂i=1t−1BΘi(ri(d))\mathcal{K}_{t-1}(\bmΘ_{1:t-1})=\bigcap_{i=1}^{t-1}B_{\bmΘ_i}(r_i(d)). Since in continual learning, the learner does not need to reach Θt\bmΘ_t exactly to successfully learn task tt, to avoid forgetting as well as reliable learning, it only needs for the learned parameter vector Wt\bm{W}_{t} to enter BΘt(rt(d))∩Kt−1(Θ1:t−1)B_{\bmΘ_t}(r_t(d)) \cap \mathcal{K}_{t-1}(\bmΘ_{1:t-1}). Using this model, we derive an upper bound on TT ensuring P[KT(Θ1:T)≠∅]→1\mathbb{P}[\mathcal{K}_{T}(\bmΘ_{1:T}) \neq \emptyset] \rightarrow 1 as d→∞d\rightarrow \infty and κ/d→ακ/d \rightarrow α, where α>0α>0 is a constant. Finally, for TT tasks sampled uniformly from ΦΦ, we derive an upper bound for total information theoretic capacity under the non-forgetting constraint for each task.

Explore similar work

Apr 15, 2026

From Order to Distribution: An Exact Operator Framework for Forgetting in Continual Learning

A central challenge in continual learning is forgetting: the loss of performance on previously learned tasks after learning new ones. Prior theory has analyzed forgetting under random orderings of fixed task collections in overparameterized linear regression. We shift the focus from task order to task distribution, asking how its structure determines forgetting. In the linear setting with a shared solution, i.i.d. task sampling, and sequential exact fitting, we derive an exact operator identity expressing historical forgetting directly in terms of the task distribution. Building on this identity, we establish an exponential decay guarantee for expected historical forgetting under every fixed task distribution in finite dimensions, characterize its asymptotic behavior, and relate decay to the distribution's coverage of observable directions. For an individual learned task, we show that subsequent tasks can collectively support recovery without exact revisits. We derive a lower bound on recovery time and construct a task distribution attaining its inverse-coverage scaling.
Oct 10, 2026

Formalizing Forgetting: Theory of Forgetting for Online Continual Learning

Online continual learning (OCL) requires a learner to acquire a sequence of tasks in a single pass over the data, and catastrophic forgetting of earlier tasks remains its central challenge. Despite the many methods proposed to mitigate forgetting, the theoretical understanding of forgetting in OCL is still limited: existing analyses mostly focus on linear, overparameterized, or neural tangent kernel regimes, and it remains unclear which factors govern forgetting and how they affect it. To fill this gap, we analyze single-pass Shuffle SGD under strongly convex and general convex objectives and derive explicit upper bounds on the expected final forgetting. Further analysis of these bounds shows how the per-task data amount, task similarity, and task ordering enter them, and that their effects can differ across objective classes. Moreover, experiments with neural networks on Split-CIFAR-100 and PMNIST show that the trends suggested by our theory also appear in practice, indicating that these insights extend beyond the convex setting.
Jul 6, 2026

To Retain or to Adapt? Generalizing Continual Learning

The Continual Learning (CL) literature has long been driven by the goal of mitigating catastrophic forgetting. This objective rests on an often unstated assumption: that a lifelong learner should approximate the Joint-Task Learning (JTL) solution and retain all previously acquired knowledge. We challenge this retention-centered premise, arguing that in non-stationary environments prioritizing retention can impede real-time adaptation. Shifting the focus to the Average Lifelong Error (ALE), we formalize CL as an online optimization problem governed by the interaction between environmental and learning dynamics. We introduce Transfer Efficiency as a quantitative measure of the tension between Instability, the bias inherited from conflicting past experience, and Transient Error, the optimization cost of learning new tasks from scratch. Under mild convergence conditions, holding across linear and neural network models, this decomposition yields a Critical Task Duration: a closed-form threshold beyond which historical knowledge transitions from a warm-start advantage to an optimization liability whenever retention induces a positive stationary bias. We validate these theoretical predictions on continual image classification and reinforcement learning benchmarks. Finally, by connecting continual learning to the online learning framework of predictable sequences, we show that JTL is only one instance of a broader family of objectives, and we propose a new general class of continual learning algorithms, which we call Predictive Continual Learning. Predictive CL algorithms optimize expected future performance under an explicit, dynamically updated model of future tasks. As a proof of concept, we analyze a Window algorithm that interpolates between JTL and Independent-Task Learning (ITL), outperforming both under controlled distributional drift.