ReDiS: Reasoning-Diagnosis Self-Evolution for Multimodal Reasoning in Remote Sensing

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated promising capabilities for remote sensing reasoning, yet they frequently generate visually unsupported reasoning that contradicts the visual evidence. Existing post-training methods optimize primarily for final-answer correctness, providing limited supervision for identifying and correcting hallucinations that arise during the reasoning process. To address this limitation, we propose FaithRS, a hallucination-aware self-reflection framework for faithful reasoning in remote sensing. We first construct SFHD-43K, a dataset of 43K structured, fine-grained hallucination annotations, and train a detector to identify hallucination types, underlying causes, and supporting visual evidence. FaithRS then incorporates this diagnostic feedback into a Safe Detector-Guided Corrective Rollout framework, where a safety-aware gate selectively determines whether and how to revise the response. Training is driven by a composite reward that jointly optimizes answer accuracy, reasoning faithfulness, hallucination reduction, format compliance, and revision safety. Experiments with Qwen3.5 backbones (0.8B, 4B, and 9B) show consistent improvements across four remote sensing benchmarks, with gains of up to 11.64 points.

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) suffer from pronounced hallucinations in remote sensing visual question-answering (RS-VQA), primarily caused by visual grounding failures in large-scale scenes or misinterpretation of fine-grained small targets. To systematically analyze these issues, we introduce RSHBench, a protocol-based benchmark for fine-grained diagnosis of factual and logical hallucinations. To mitigate grounding-induced factual hallucinations, we further propose Relative Attention-Driven Actively Reasoning (RADAR), a training-free inference method that leverages intrinsic attention in MLLMs to guide progressive localization and fine-grained local reasoning at test time. Extensive experiments across diverse MLLMs demonstrate that RADAR consistently improves RS-VQA performance and reduces both factual and logical hallucinations. Code and data will be publicly available at: https://github.com/MiliLab/RADAR

The rapid development of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) has introduced a flexible paradigm for remote sensing image scene understanding (RSISU), enabling natural-language interaction with remote sensing imagery. However, a systematic understanding of the capability boundaries, cross-task generalization, and task-specific limitations of existing remote sensing MLLMs (RS-MLLMs) is still lacking. This paper presents a systematic survey and diagnostic evaluation of MLLMs for RSISU. We review the technical evolution of RS-MLLMs, focusing on model design, multimodal learning, training data, and downstream capabilities. We further compare RS-MLLMs with general-purpose computer vision MLLMs (CV-MLLMs) across diverse RSISU tasks and benchmarks. RS-MLLMs remain competitive in domain-specific settings, particularly remote sensing visual grounding and high-resolution visual question answering. More notably, general-purpose CV-MLLMs can match or even outperform these specialized models on several RSISU tasks without remote sensing-specific fine-tuning. These findings demonstrate the strong transferability of general-purpose CV-MLLMs and show that current RS-MLLMs do not consistently outperform them across diverse RSISU tasks. Current MLLMs also face limitations in spatial and relational reasoning, fine-grained visual understanding, instruction diversity, and generalization across heterogeneous task formats. Based on these findings, we outline future directions toward reliable evaluation, multimodal and high-resolution reasoning, efficient deployment, and tool-augmented remote sensing agents. This survey provides a systematic reference for developing robust, generalizable, and practical MLLMs for RSISU.