Abstractive summarization remains challenging across languages, where linguistic quality and factual consistency may diverge, particularly in low-resource settings. We present a standardized zero-shot benchmark of eight closed-source and open-weight LLMs on size-matched English and Bengali XL-Sum test sets. Our evaluation combines lexical and semantic metrics with reference-free factuality verification and multidimensional LLM-as-a-Judge assessment, providing a comprehensive analysis of both surface-level quality and factual reliability in multilingual summarization. Results reveal substantial cross-lingual variation: GPT-5.6 Luna leads several English lexical metrics but does not maintain the same advantage in Bengali, where LLaMA 3.3 70B achieves the highest ROUGE and BLEU scores. Gemini 2.5 Flash obtains the highest observed Bengali factuality score. Furthermore, evaluation methods produce different model rankings, highlighting the limitations of relying on a single metric for multilingual summarization assessment. These findings demonstrate that strong English summarization performance does not necessarily transfer to Bengali and emphasize the need for comprehensive evaluation frameworks for low-resource languages.
Figures & tables
Model
Access Provider
Type
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI
Closed-source
GPT-4o Mini
OpenAI
Closed-source
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Google AI Studio
Closed-source
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google AI Studio
Closed-source
LLaMA 3.3 70B
Groq
Open-weight
DeepSeek V4 Flash
OpenRouter
Open-weight
Table 1: Overview of the eight evaluated LLMs and their access providers.
Lang.
Model
R-1
R-2
R-L
BLEU
chrF
BERTScore
SE
BSE
English
GPT-5.6 Luna
24.12
5.87
15.96
2.06
31.51
86.75
58.05
—
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
22.94
5.89
15.32
2.14
30.39
87.01
52.28
—
Gemini 2.5 Flash
22.13
5.43
14.72
1.90
29.62
86.57
59.44
—
Qwen 3.5 Flash
21.99
4.93
14.48
1.66
29.46
86.69
58.52
—
Qwen 3.6 27B
21.47
4.85
13.99
1.68
28.96
86.57
56.58
—
DeepSeek V4 Flash
21.46
5.28
14.13
1.82
29.36
86.30
63.45
—
Table 2: English and Bengali XL-Sum benchmark results. R-1, R-2, and R-L denote ROUGE-1, ROUGE-2, and ROUGE-L, respectively. BERTScore, SE, and BSE denote BERTScore-F1, SummEval F1, and BanglaSummEval F1, respectively. All metrics are reported on a 0–100 scale. A dash (—) indicates that the corresponding language-specific factuality score is not applicable. Bold values indicate the best performance within each language group.
Comparison
Mean ± SD
95% CI
t
Paired t -test p / Bootstrap p
LLaMA 3.3 70B
16.23 ± 9.05
[15.69, 16.79]
2.713
0.0067 / 0.0070
GPT-4o Mini
15.63 ± 8.27
[15.12, 16.13]
LLaMA 3.3 70B
16.23 ± 9.05
[15.69, 16.79]
5.364
<0.0001 / <0.001
Gemini 2.5 Flash
15.05 ± 7.86
[14.55, 15.52]
Table 3: Statistical comparison of selected model pairs on Bengali ROUGE-1 ( N=1,012 ). Bootstrap confidence intervals and bootstrap significance estimates are based on 5,000 paired resamples.
Lang.
Model
Rel
Comp
Faith
Coh
Conc
Flue
English
GPT-5.6 Luna
3.16
3.54
1.24
4.76
3.36
5.00
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
3.04
3.48
1.34
4.82
3.14
5.00
DeepSeek V4 Flash
2.92
3.38
1.30
4.78
3.06
5.00
Qwen 3.5 Flash
2.96
3.26
1.28
4.70
3.16
5.00
LLaMA 3.3 70B
3.02
3.36
1.24
4.78
2.80
5.00
Qwen 3.6 27B
2.86
3.26
1.24
4.76
3.10
5.00
Table 4: LLM-as-a-Judge ( gpt-5.6-terra ) evaluation using a 1–5 Likert scale. Rel: Relevance; Comp: Completeness; Faith: Faithfulness; Coh: Coherence; Conc: Conciseness; Flue: Fluency. Bold values indicate the best performance within each language group.
Evaluating factual consistency is essential for reliable text summarization, particularly in high-stakes domains such as healthcare and news. However, most existing evaluation metrics overlook Bangla, a widely spoken yet under-resourced language, and often depend on reference summaries. We introduce BanglaSummEval, a reference-free, question-answering-based framework for evaluating factual consistency in Bangla summarization. The proposed method assesses both factual accuracy and content coverage through automatically generated questions and answers derived from the source document and the summary. A single multilingual instruction-tuned language model handles question generation, question answering, candidate answer extraction, and question importance weighting. This unified design reduces system complexity and computational cost. To capture semantic consistency beyond surface-level overlap, we use BERTScore-Recall for answer comparison. We validate BanglaSummEval on 300 human-written summaries from educational and medical domains, demonstrating strong correlation with expert human judgments (Pearson's r=0.694, Spearman's ρ=0.763). By providing interpretable, step-wise diagnostics alongside reliable evaluation scores, BanglaSummEval offers a practical and transparent solution for factual consistency evaluation in low-resource language settings.
Ahmed Rafid, Rumman Adib, Fariya Ahmed +2
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Islamic University of Technology, Bangladesh · York University, Canada
Abstractive summarization aims to generate concise summaries by creating new sentences, allowing for flexible rephrasing. However, this approach can be vulnerable to inaccuracies, particularly `hallucinations' where the model introduces non-existent information. In this paper, we leverage the use of multimodal and multilingual sentence embeddings derived from pretrained models such as LaBSE, SONAR, and BGE-M3, and feed them into a modified BART-based French model. A Named Entity Injection mechanism that appends tokenized named entities to the decoder input is introduced, in order to improve the factual consistency of the generated summary. Our novel framework, SBARThez, is applicable to both text and speech inputs and supports cross-lingual summarization; it shows competitive performance relative to token-level baselines, especially for low-resource languages, while generating more concise and abstract summaries.
Multi-target cross-lingual text summarization (MTXLS), which summarizes a source document into multiple target languages, is increasingly important as users consume content in diverse languages, but remains underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce multi-target cross-lingual element-aware (MEA), a new MTXLS benchmark covering 24 target languages. We benchmark end-to-end and pipeline approaches across various LLMs and show that MTXLS performance still substantially lags behind English monolingual summarization. To better understand MTXLS in LLMs, we propose a layer-wise analysis framework for investigating how LLMs internally perform MTXLS. Our analyses suggest that translation and summarization behaviors emerge jointly within later layers rather than as distinctly decomposed stages. Most task-relevant processing occurs within these layers, and errors also tend to arise at similar depths. Motivated by these findings, we introduce an inference-time activation steering method that leverages hidden representations from English summarization to guide MTXLS generation. Experiments show that our method consistently improves MTXLS quality across target languages.