Abstractive summarization aims to generate concise summaries by creating new sentences, allowing for flexible rephrasing. However, this approach can be vulnerable to inaccuracies, particularly `hallucinations' where the model introduces non-existent information. In this paper, we leverage the use of multimodal and multilingual sentence embeddings derived from pretrained models such as LaBSE, SONAR, and BGE-M3, and feed them into a modified BART-based French model. A Named Entity Injection mechanism that appends tokenized named entities to the decoder input is introduced, in order to improve the factual consistency of the generated summary. Our novel framework, SBARThez, is applicable to both text and speech inputs and supports cross-lingual summarization; it shows competitive performance relative to token-level baselines, especially for low-resource languages, while generating more concise and abstract summaries.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: The sentence-based summarization model architecture
Dataset
Train
Dev
Test
MLSUM
392,876
16,059
15,828
OrangeSum
21,401
1,500
1,500
DECODA
1,390
396
200
WikiLingua
43,423
6,193
12,405
CrossSum
8,648
1,083
1,083
Table 1: Number of documents per dataset
Model
R-L ↑
BertS ↑
NEHR ↓
Ground Truth
100
100
34.01
BARThez
22.57
27.95
26.88
SBARThez-BGE
19.24
24.61
58.52
SBARThez-LaBSE
17.53
22.83
71.79
SBARThez-SONAR
19.10
24.58
59.23
Table 2: Results on the OrangeSum test-set. Best results are bold , and second-best results are underlined . BertS refers to BertScore.
Figure 2: The sentence-based summarization model architecture with the NEI mechanism
Model
R-L ↑
BertS ↑
NEHR ↓
Ground Truth
100
100
34.01
BARThez
22.57
27.95
26.88
SBARThez-BGE
20.22
26.05
34.16
SBARThez-LaBSE
18.56
24.24
38.41
SBARThez-SONAR
19.40
25.37
36.31
Table 3: Results on the OrangeSum test-set, with SBARThez models using the NEI module.
Model
Ground Truth
Source Document
Length
R-L ↑
BertS ↑
P-R1 ↓
EFC ↓
EFD ↓
Token-Encoding
BARThez
22.57
27.95
91.65
89.11
6.66
24.71
flanT5-base
22.61
27.54
94.00
92.37
8.60
27.87
mT5-small
20.22
24.06
95.22
95.39
9.99
25.88
mBART-50
22.05
26.76
93.13
90.96
8.63
27.72
Table 4: Comparison of summarization methods on OrangeSum in terms of abstractiveness, accuracy, and summary length (average words excluding punctuation).
SBARThez BGE
SBARThez LaBSE
SBARThez SONAR
R-L ↑
BertS ↑
R-L ↑
BertS ↑
R-L ↑
BertS ↑
FR
24.18
32.80
20.17
26.32
23.18
32.21
EN
20.29
28.30
18.87
24.89
21.56
30.03
ES
20.06
28.70
18.80
24.25
21.54
29.62
IT
19.89
28.63
18.25
24.38
20.82
29.47
PT
19.70
28.50
18.56
25.22
21.19
30.07
Table 5: Results on WikiLingua commun test-set.
EN
AR
RU
UK
KO
JA
VI
ID
SW
HI
SBARThez-BGE (ours)
29.40
29.83
29.15
29.91
28.59
33.25
28.92
30.64
30.95
25.61
MT+BARThez
29.11
30.71
30.05
28.89
28.68
15.65
30.18
31.62
31.33
26.49
LLaMA-8B
25.00
26.33
24.61
25.61
24.19
29.23
26.12
25.61
21.48
20.68
#Test-Dev Samples
377
197
160
143
52
54
88
204
174
119
Table 6: Results on CrossSum using BertScore ↑ – High-Resource Languages
PA
UR
PS
MR
YO
SO
AZ
TA
MY
SI
GU
IG
RN
PCM
SBARThez-BGE (ours)
18.40
17.19
28.38
25.81
30.75
28.52
29.44
25.72
26.03
25.98
25.11
26.77
26.14
29.81
MT+BARThez
16.05
17.67
27.42
24.37
16.25
05.28
22.54
15.24
06.44
27.09
03.09
05.45
-
-
LLaMA-8B
14.62
21.61
25.99
19.89
23.96
21.64
24.22
15.32
21.65
24.03
19.38
17.92
22.57
25.53
#Test-Dev Samples
45
152
36
46
33
100
42
84
17
19
46
20
144
88
Table 7: Results on CrossSum using BertScore ↑ – Low-Resource Languages .
Model
Train Data
Test Data
R-L ↑
BertS ↑
BARThez
Text
Text
29.11
38.90
Cascaded_1
-
Speech
23.43
32.55
Cascaded_2
-
Speech
27.82
38.54
SBARThez BGE
Text
Text
24.64
35.07
Text
Speech
22.86
32.05
Speech
Speech
23.99
34.64
Table 8: Results on the DECODA test-set.
Category
Method
R-L ↑
BertS ↑
GT Segmentation
-
24.64
35.07
Content-aware Segmentation
VAD
23.51
34.43
Spk DIAR
24.18
34.95
Time-driven Segmentation
3sec fixed
23.83
34.23
5sec fixed
24.42
34.98
8sec fixed
23.80
34.22
Table 9: Segmentation results with SBARThez-BGE. Evaluation is made on speech segments using different segmentation methods.
Abstractive summarization remains challenging across languages, where linguistic quality and factual consistency may diverge, particularly in low-resource settings. We present a standardized zero-shot benchmark of eight closed-source and open-weight LLMs on size-matched English and Bengali XL-Sum test sets. Our evaluation combines lexical and semantic metrics with reference-free factuality verification and multidimensional LLM-as-a-Judge assessment, providing a comprehensive analysis of both surface-level quality and factual reliability in multilingual summarization. Results reveal substantial cross-lingual variation: GPT-5.6 Luna leads several English lexical metrics but does not maintain the same advantage in Bengali, where LLaMA 3.3 70B achieves the highest ROUGE and BLEU scores. Gemini 2.5 Flash obtains the highest observed Bengali factuality score. Furthermore, evaluation methods produce different model rankings, highlighting the limitations of relying on a single metric for multilingual summarization assessment. These findings demonstrate that strong English summarization performance does not necessarily transfer to Bengali and emphasize the need for comprehensive evaluation frameworks for low-resource languages.
Khan Mahi Al Atahar, Nazifa Tasneem, Ajwad Abrar
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Islamic University of Technology, Gazipur, Bangladesh
As information increasingly traverses linguistic boundaries, users require concise cross-lingual representations of long-form content. Nevertheless, long-document summarization research remains text-centric, whereas multilingual speech research has largely prioritized translation, preserving source content rather than compressing it. We address this methodological gap by formalizing joint speech summarization and translation (JSumT): the generation of a succinct, faithful target-language summary directly from a long spoken document in a source language. We additionally introduce VoxSumm, the first multilingual and cross-lingual benchmark for this task, comprising 10,045 BBC article-summary pairs across 24 languages and encompassing approximately 703 hours of speech data. Our evaluation of representative speech-language models reveals pronounced variation across models and generation settings: Gemini3.1-Pro demonstrates the greatest consistency, summarization into English generally surpasses generation into non-English target languages, and translating an entire document before summarization compounds instruction-following failures. Through the release of VoxSumm, we establish a foundation for developing and evaluating multilingual systems capable of jointly interpreting, compressing, and translating long-form speech.
Yejin Jeon, Marie Maltais, Virginia Ceccatelli +2
Mila - Quebec AI Institute · McGill University, Canada · Google DeepMind +1
Abstractive summarization requires models to generate summaries that convey information in the source document. While large language models can generate summaries without fine-tuning, they often miss key details and include extraneous information. We propose BLooP (Bigram Lookahead Promotion), a simple training-free decoding intervention that encourages large language models (LLMs) to generate tokens that form bigrams from the source document. BLooP operates through a hash table lookup at each decoding step, requiring no training, fine-tuning, or model modification. We demonstrate improvements in ROUGE and BARTScore for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, Mistral-Nemo-Instruct-2407, and Gemma-2-9b-it on CNN/DM, CCSum, Multi-News, and SciTLDR. Human evaluation shows that BLooP significantly improves faithfulness without reducing readability. We make the code available at https://github.com/varuniyer/BLooP