MagicGarment: Benchmarking Single-Image Standalone 3D Garment Reconstruction
Authors: Jia Chen, Ruyang Zhao, Jun Bai, Chao Huang, Saishang Zhong, Xinrong Hu
Organizations: School of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan 430200, China · Engineering Research Center of Hubei Province for Clothing Information, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan 430200, China · School of Computer Science, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0E9, Canada
Single-image 3D reconstruction has advanced rapidly, yet standalone garments remain challenging due to thin-shell geometry, open boundaries, and layered structures. Existing datasets and evaluation protocols provide limited support for systematic evaluation in this setting. We introduce MagicGarment, a benchmark for single-image standalone 3D garment reconstruction with 1,518 professionally constructed assets across 17 composite garment types, aligned multimodal annotations, and a unified evaluation protocol. We further establish a garment-aware reference baseline by adapting a pretrained image-to-3D backbone at two levels: Grounded Semantic Refinement (GSR) provides garment-focused visual conditioning, while Flow-Time-Route LoRA (FTR-LoRA) adapts the frozen 3D generative backbone using flow-timestep, token-routing, and expert-load information. Experiments demonstrate MagicGarment's benchmark utility and the effectiveness of garment-aware adaptation. Project page: https://1019538157.github.io/MagicGarment/.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overview of MagicGarment. Left: representative garment assets and aligned multimodal annotations. Right: the single-image standalone 3D garment reconstruction task.
Figure 2: Overview of the garment-aware reference baseline built on pretrained Hunyuan3D. GSR performs input-level garment refinement, while FTR-LoRA provides model-level adaptation of the frozen Hunyuan3D-DiT backbone.
Figure 3: Representative 3D garment assets across the 17 composite types in MagicGarment.
Dataset
Avg. #Vertices
Avg. #Faces
#Types
Method
#Annotations
MagicGarment
375,817
665,488
17
Professional 3D artist modeling
9
SewFactory
8,813
16,834
13
Simulation
3
CLOTH3D
7,473
14,329
6
Simulation
3
DeepFashion3D
21,782
42,613
10
Real scans
4
GarmentCode v2
14,035
26,384
N/A
Simulation
4
Table 1: Comparison of representative 3D garment datasets.
Figure 4: Qualitative comparison on MagicGarment. Each example shows the input image, ground-truth mesh, and reconstructions from our garment-aware baseline and representative image-to-3D methods.
Geometry
Appearance
Normal
Semantic
Method
CD ↓
F-score ↑
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
LPIPS ↓
PSNR-N ↑
LPIPS-N ↓
U1-I ↑
U1-T ↑
U2-I ↑
U2-T ↑
Uni-I ↑
Uni-T ↑
Hunyuan3D-2.1
4.2322
12.5148
17.6060
0.8193
0.2294
16.0559
0.2386
0.1139
0.0612
0.3975
0.2845
0.3411
0.2601
AIpparel
34.4063
5.0719
14.1433
0.7452
0.4192
9.5482
0.4608
0.0613
-0.0336
0.1276
0.0731
0.0837
0.0952
ChatGarment
39.4414
4.6322
14.1324
0.7617
0.4161
9.8198
0.4453
0.0607
-0.0324
0.1203
0.0696
0.0899
0.1046
CRM
11.5174
6.5935
18.5177
0.8252
0.2431
15.3413
0.2646
0.1253
0.0688
0.3078
0.2043
0.2712
0.1966
LGM
16.5124
5.2953
18.1696
0.8254
0.2531
15.5809
0.2594
0.1392
0.0599
0.2844
0.1855
0.2487
0.1987
Table 2: Zero-shot benchmark results on MagicGarment. U1/U2 denote ULIP-1/2, Uni denotes Uni3D, and I/T denote image/text similarity.
Geometry
Appearance
Normal
Semantic
Method
CD ↓
F-score ↑
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
LPIPS ↓
PSNR-N ↑
LPIPS-N ↓
U1-I ↑
U1-T ↑
U2-I ↑
U2-T ↑
Uni-I ↑
Uni-T ↑
Hunyuan3D-2.1
2.7026
14.0527
19.0146
0.8380
0.1889
17.6048
0.2069
0.1162
0.0597
0.3900
0.2813
0.3475
0.2584
InstantMesh
11.3486
8.0174
17.6216
0.8475
0.1962
18.0185
0.2140
0.1402
0.0586
0.3751
0.2657
0.3198
0.2455
TRELLIS
4.3491
11.6548
17.9737
0.7390
0.2810
13.6614
0.2659
0.1227
0.0592
0.3629
0.2418
0.3094
0.2199
TRELLIS.2
3.2618
15.2347
17.8024
0.7824
0.2518
14.6542
0.2292
0.1334
0.0599
0.3588
0.2342
0.3035
0.2156
Wonder3D
11.0617
10.4935
16.0713
0.8296
0.2480
16.6064
0.2332
0.1359
0.0340
0.3642
0.2461
0.3008
0.2467
Table 3: In-domain adaptation results on MagicGarment. U1/U2 denote ULIP-1/2, Uni denotes Uni3D, and I/T denote image/text similarity.
CVLab, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland · Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence, United Arab Emirates · Pinscreen and Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence, United Arab Emirates