Zero-shot text-to-speech (TTS) typically conditions on a short speech prompt, which conveys timbre but provides only limited evidence of a speaker's prosodic patterns. We formulate Long-Prompt Zero-Shot TTS, a task that uses long speech prompts at inference time to reproduce speaker-specific prosody without target-speaker fine-tuning. We introduce LP-TTS-Bench, a bilingual benchmark of 37 speakers with 63.95 prompt hours and 2,728 held-out test utterances. Beyond intelligibility and timbre similarity, LP-TTS-Bench evaluates timing, prominence, intonation, and model-based prosody metrics, enabling multidimensional evaluation of prosody reproduction. As a reference system, we develop LPTTS, whose hierarchical Long-Prompt Encoder compresses long speech prompts into a fixed number of continuous prosody vectors. Experiments show improvements in several prosodic dimensions over a short-prompt baseline, with overall gains as prompt duration increases up to approximately 10 minutes and saturation at longer durations.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Illustration of Long-Prompt Zero-Shot TTS . Compared with a short prompt, a long prompt provides richer evidence of speaker-specific prosody, enabling the model to reproduce both timbre and prosody without target-speaker fine-tuning.
Figure 2: Overview of the LPTTS system. The Long-Prompt Encoder extracts global and target-conditioned prosodic representations from long speech prompt and injects them into Qwen3TTS by gated cross-attention. Timbre conditioning is provided by the native speaker encoder.
Model
Target Spk. SFT?
Conventional
Timing
Prominence
Intonation
Prosody model
Subjective
WER/CER ↓
SIM-O ↑
SRD ↓
PD ↓
PCC ↑
IC ↑
PRD ↓
MPM-SIM ↑
AutoPCP ↑
P-MOS ↑
Chinese
Qwen3TTS-Base
×
0.73
0.56
0.155
0.074
0.389
0.437
5.017
0.721
3.128
2.941
Qwen3TTS-SFT
✓
1.78
0.57
0.139
0.065
0.395
0.463
4.764
0.733
3.216
3.471
LPTTS-Base
×
1.29
0.58
0.155
0.069
0.387
0.437
5.013
0.728
3.181
3.235
LPTTS
×
1.03
0.57
0.137
0.067
0.410
0.474
4.532
0.734
3.148
3.529
Table 1: Main results on LP-TTS-Bench. WER/CER is reported in percent. Arrows indicate the preferred direction. The checkmark indicates target-speaker fine-tuning. Bold and underlining denote the best and second-best results within each language, respectively; tied values share the same formatting.
Figure 3: Effect of prompt length on intelligibility, speaker similarity, and prosody reproduction for Chinese. English results show similar trends and are omitted due to space limitations.
Feature
Δ [95% CI]
Closer Rate
Pitch
−0.054 [ −0.061 , −0.040 ]
60.2%
Energy
−0.047 [ −0.060 , −0.036 ]
56.4%
Timing/pause
−0.065 [ −0.082 , −0.063 ]
59.9%
Overall
−0.059 [ −0.067 , −0.053 ]
62.6%
Table 2: Relationship between textual and prosodic similarity. Negative Δ favors textually similar prompts.
Personalized text-to-speech (TTS) aims to clone the target speaker in the synthesized speech, imitating both the voice and speaking style. Current large language model (LLM)-based TTS methods ignore the style-specific prosodic patterns in generated speech, resulting in deficient style learning and thus limiting speaker similarity in synthesized speech. To this end, we investigate the prosody learning conditioned on the synthesized speech, and propose to predict the prosody of the current syllable based on previously predicted speech. Experimental results obtained on three datasets demonstrated the efficacy of the proposed dynamic prosody prediction method in enhancing the prosody learning capability, thereby improving the speaker similarity of the generated speech. Audio samples are available at https://muzw.github.io/dynapros/.
Zhenwei Mou, Liping Chen, Yajun Hu +3
University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui, China · iFLYTEK, Anhui, China
Recently, zero-shot text-to-speech (TTS) has enabled high-fidelity and expressive speech synthesis, but it often fails to imitate unseen speaking styles from uncommon scenarios (e.g., crosstalk, dialects). Moreover, fine-tuning pretrained models requires large, high-quality datasets, limiting rapid personalization. We propose VoiceTTA, a reinforcement learning-based test-time adaptation (TTA) method that improves voice imitation of pretrained zero-shot TTS models. VoiceTTA introduces two style rewards based on coefficient-of-variation differences of F0 and energy, combined with speaker similarity and intelligibility (WER from a pretrained Whisper model), and optimizes learnable prefixes via group relative preference optimization (GRPO) in a flow matching-based model at inference time. Extensive experiments demonstrate substantial improvements on uncommon speech prompts, outperforming state-of-the-art baselines. Audio samples are available at https://voicetta.pages.dev/
Tianxin Xie, Chenxing Li, Dong Yu +1
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou) · Tencent
Long-form text-to-speech (TTS) enables multi-turn conversations with consistent prosody and higher quality voice cloning from longer reference audio. Recent open-weights autoregressive TTS models such as Qwen3-TTS and VoxCPM2 attain state-of-the-art word error rate (WER) and speaker similarity (SIM) on short-form prompts but significantly deteriorate when used with long-form prompts. We propose Localized Attention-Constrained Inference (LACI), an inference-only method to detect TTS errors in near real-time, roll back to the error onset and regenerate with temporary guardrails, adding negligible computational overhead. Using LACI, we improve worst-of-N WER across 10 RNG seeds for Qwen3-TTS-0.6B from 35.2% to 3.4% on prompts longer than 1500 words, even surpassing its short-form reliability of 5.4% on prompts with fewer than 500 words. To demonstrate the efficacy of LACI on voice cloning reliability, we propose a sliding-window version of the SIM metric that we call wSIM. wSIM exposes several novel failure patterns that are not captured by SIM. LACI improves worst-of-N wSIM from 0.01 to 0.47 on 120 seconds of reference audio while reducing the rate of catastrophic generations with WER above 30% from 26% to below 1%
Rongxiang Wang, Berkin Durmus, Aysegul Orhon +2
Argmax, Inc. · University of Virginia · Bilkent University