Organizations: Southeast University · Shanghai Innovation Institute · Shanghai Jiao Tong University · Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Vision-language-action (VLA) models have emerged as a powerful paradigm for robotic manipulation, enabling robots to generate actions from visual observations and language instructions. However, most existing VLA models still operate on image-level visual representations inherited from pretrained vision-language backbones, while lacking fine-grained object understanding for manipulation. As a result, their robustness can degrade under out-of-distribution object layouts, clutter, and background variations. To address these limitations, we introduce ObjDream, an object-centric VLA framework centered on object-level understanding and future object state prediction. ObjDream uses a spatio-temporal object encoder to organize visual observations into temporal object slots, where persistent object identity and dynamic object state are represented through separate channels. These structured object representations are inserted into the token sequence of the vision-language model (VLM), where identity-guided routing modulates VLM attention to the corresponding object tokens. In addition, an action-conditioned object dynamics module predicts compact future object states relevant to manipulation during training, explicitly supervising object state evolution under robot actions without requiring future prediction at inference. Experiments on LIBERO, LIBERO-Plus, and RoboTwin 2.0 show that ObjDream improves generalization under diverse distribution shifts and scene perturbations. Real-world robot experiments further demonstrate that ObjDream transfers to physical manipulation settings with novel object arrangements and background changes.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overview of ObjDream. We introduce ObjDream, an object-centric VLA framework for robust manipulation. Unlike prior VLA models (a), which primarily rely on image-level understanding and entangled object representations, ObjDream (b) introduces explicit object-level representations and future object state prediction. This object-centric formulation improves manipulation robustness, leading to stronger performance than baseline methods (c).
Figure 2: Overview of the ObjDream architecture. The model integrates three main components: (1) a spatio-temporal object encoder that constructs factorized object slots by separately representing persistent object identity and time-varying object state; (2) an object-level dynamics module that decodes current object states and predicts action-conditioned future object states; and (3) a flow-matching action expert that predicts robot action chunks. ObjDream enhances object-level understanding through factorized object representations and future object state modeling, enabling more generalizable language-conditioned manipulation under object and scene variations.
Figure 3: Experimental overview. We evaluate ObjDream on LIBERO, LIBERO-Plus, a fixed 8 -task subset of RoboTwin 2.0, and four real-world manipulation tasks, covering standard and perturbed evaluation settings.
Method
LIBERO
LIBERO-Plus
Spatial
Object
Goal
Long
Avg
Cam.
Robot
Layout
Lang.
Light
BG
Noise
Overall
General VLA models
OpenVLA ( Kim et al., 2024 )
84.7
88.4
79.2
53.7
76.5
0.8
3.5
28.5
23.0
8.1
34.8
15.2
15.6
OpenVLA-OFT ( Kim et al., 2025 )
97.6
98.4
97.9
94.5
97.1
56.4
31.9
74.2
79.5
88.7
93.3
75.8
69.6
UniVLA ( Bu et al., 2025 )
96.5
96.8
95.6
92.0
95.2
1.8
46.2
31.9
69.6
69.0
81.0
21.2
42.9
π0 ( Black et al., 2024 )
96.8
98.8
95.8
85.2
94.2
13.8
6.0
68.9
58.8
85.0
81.4
79.0
53.6
Table 1: Performance on standard LIBERO and zero-shot robustness on LIBERO-Plus. All LIBERO-Plus results are evaluated without fine-tuning on perturbed environments. Best results are shown in bold, and second-best results are underlined.
Figure 4: Success rates on the fixed 8 -task RoboTwin 2.0 subset under Easy and Hard settings.
Variant
LIBERO
LIBERO-Plus
Long
Cam.
Robot
Layout
Lang.
Light
BG
Noise
Overall
Backbone baseline
95.4
66.4
74.7
80.0
87.1
91.7
92.4
82.8
81.2
w/o ObjRel & ObjDyn
95.2
65.6
73.7
78.9
87.4
95.6
96.9
85.0
82.1
w/o ObjDyn
96.2
66.6
75.0
80.6
88.2
96.2
96.4
87.3
83.2
w/o ObjRel
96.6
67.4
76.1
80.9
88.2
97.6
97.8
88.9
84.1
w/o Fact. Injection
96.2
65.9
75.3
81.0
89.0
94.4
93.5
85.5
82.5
Table 2: Ablation study of object-centric components. Success rates (%) on LIBERO-Long and LIBERO-Plus. Overall is the trial-weighted LIBERO-Plus average. Best results are shown in bold, and second-best results are underlined.
Eval.
Method
Button Pressing
Block Pick-and-Place
Two-Fruit Placement
Tabletop Sweeping
Avg. Success
ID
π0.5 ( Physical Intelligence et al., 2025 )
90
70
40
65
66
ControlVLA ( Li et al., 2025a )
65
40
70
65
60
ObjDream (Ours)
80
65
60
90
74
OOD
π0.5 ( Physical Intelligence et al., 2025 )
65
60
40
45
53
ControlVLA ( Li et al., 2025a )
40
10
35
40
31
ObjDream (Ours)
65
50
50
55
55
Table 3: Real-robot manipulation results. Success rates (%) on four real-world tasks under ID and OOD evaluation. Best and second-best results within each setting are bold and underlined.
Appendix figures & tables6 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Figure 5: Automatic offline annotation pipeline for object encoder pretraining. Qwen3-VL-8B extracts task-relevant object phrases from demonstration instructions and initial observations, while a separate robot gripper label is used for robot annotation. Grounding DINO initializes the corresponding object regions, SAM2 propagates segmentation masks across frames, and DINOv2 extracts object-specific features from the initial grounded regions. Masks, geometry, visibility, and phrase–region correspondences are automatically constructed from this pipeline without manual frame-wise object annotation. The resulting annotations supervise encoder pretraining, while the DINOv2 features provide visual identity references.
Subset
Method
Center error (%) ↓
Box IoU ↑
Mask IoU ↑
Unclamped
Current state persistence
6.37
0.634
0.564
Future prediction
1.60
0.690
0.616
Displacement
Current state persistence
13.91
0.287
0.245
Future prediction
2.03
0.575
0.542
Appendix
Table 4: Future object state prediction accuracy on LIBERO. Current state persistence repeats the current object state at each future target. Bold indicates the better value within each comparison.
Figure 6: Qualitative future object mask predictions on LIBERO. Rows show three representative manipulation tasks. The decoder predicts all future steps h=1,…,Hf for non-robot objects; for clarity, we visualize only h=1,4,8 . The predicted masks are overlaid on the corresponding future RGB frames, which are used only for visualization and are not provided to the decoder.
Figure 7: Qualitative future object state predictions on RoboTwin 2.0. Rows show representative tasks from the fixed eight-task subset. The decoder predicts all future steps for non-robot objects; for clarity, we visualize masks and bounding boxes only at h=1,4,8 . The predictions are overlaid on the corresponding future RGB frames, which are used only for visualization and are not provided to the decoder.
Figure 8: Qualitative future object state predictions on real-world tasks. Rows show button pressing, two-fruit placement, block pick-and-place, and tabletop sweeping. The decoder predicts all future steps for non-robot objects; for clarity, we visualize masks and bounding boxes only at h=1,4,8 . The predictions are overlaid on the corresponding future RGB frames, which are used only for visualization and are not provided to the decoder.
Subset
Conditioning
Center error (%) ↓
Box IoU ↑
Mask IoU ↑
Unclamped
No Action
1.90
0.659
0.609
Mismatched Action
2.02
0.660
0.587
Native Predicted Action
1.60
0.690
0.616
Displacement
No Action
2.35
0.546
0.534
Mismatched Action
2.71
0.532
0.486
Native Predicted Action
2.03
0.575
0.542
Appendix
Table 5: Sensitivity of future object state prediction to action conditioning on LIBERO. Native Predicted Action uses the original auxiliary action proposal; No Action removes the position-aware action embedding; and Mismatched Action replaces it with the position-aware embedding of a predicted action chunk from another sample within the same task. All other model components and prediction targets are kept fixed.
Vision-language-action (VLA) models have become an important paradigm for robotic manipulation by unifying visual perception, language understanding, and action generation. Since reliable manipulation requires sufficient observation of objects, end-effectors, and their spatial relationships, multi-view inputs are widely used to provide complementary spatial information. However, our experiments show that existing VLA models do not fully exploit such multi-view complementarity. The policy tends to persistently rely on the wrist view, lacking the ability to dynamically adjust global-local view dependency across manipulation stages, which limits stage adaptability and robustness. To address this issue, we propose FocusVLA, a stage-aware multi-view routing framework. FocusVLA predicts future interaction intent from historical actions and uses it to guide dynamic view routing during action generation. By adaptively coordinating global and local observations across different task stages, FocusVLA improves multi-view utilization. On RoboTwin 2.0, FocusVLA improves the average success rate over the strongest baseline π0.5 by 10.10 pp. In real-world evaluation, FocusVLA improves the success rate from 71.7% to 85.0%, achieving a 13.3% gain over π0.5. Moreover, the intent prediction and dynamic routing modules of FocusVLA can be integrated into existing VLA frameworks without modifying their core architectures.
Huixin Xu, Ziya Yu, Peng Li
Nanjing Institute of Software Technology · Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences · University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing +2
The development of Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models has been significantly accelerated by pre-trained Vision-Language Models (VLMs). However, most existing end-to-end VLAs treat the VLM primarily as a multimodal encoder, directly mapping vision-language features to low-level actions. This paradigm underutilizes the VLM's potential in high-level decision making and introduces training instability, frequently degrading its rich semantic representations. To address these limitations, we introduce DIAL, a framework bridging high-level decision making and low-level motor execution through a differentiable latent intent bottleneck. Specifically, a VLM-based System-2 performs latent world modeling by synthesizing latent visual foresight within the VLM's native feature space; this foresight explicitly encodes intent and serves as the structural bottleneck. A lightweight System-1 policy then decodes this predicted intent together with the current observation into precise robot actions via latent inverse dynamics. To ensure optimization stability, we employ a two-stage training paradigm: a decoupled warmup phase where System-2 learns to predict latent futures while System-1 learns motor control under ground-truth future guidance within a unified feature space, followed by seamless end-to-end joint optimization. This enables action-aware gradients to refine the VLM backbone in a controlled manner, preserving pre-trained knowledge. Extensive experiments on the RoboCasa GR1 Tabletop benchmark show that DIAL establishes a new state-of-the-art, achieving superior performance with 10x fewer demonstrations than prior methods. Furthermore, by leveraging heterogeneous human demonstrations, DIAL learns physically grounded manipulation priors and exhibits robust zero-shot generalization to unseen objects and novel configurations during real-world deployment on a humanoid robot.
Yi Chen, Yuying Ge, Hui Zhou +3
The University of Hong Kong · XPENG Robotics · University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Vision-language-action (VLA) models transfer semantic knowledge acquired through vision-language pretraining to robot control, achieving strong performance across various benchmarks. However, most VLAs directly map observations to demonstrated actions without explicit supervision of intermediate physical state changes, making them prone to overfitting observation-action correspondences. Some methods introduce intermediate reasoning or future-state prediction in language, visual, or latent spaces to guide action generation, but do not explicitly supervise the physical state transition itself. We therefore propose VLA-Δ, a general framework that uses physical changes between current and future states as explicit learning targets. To support this objective, we construct a large-scale pretraining dataset and derive physical state-transition annotations covering task-relevant semantics and visual motion changes, providing more direct supervision for continuous action generation. During inference, the model generates actions directly from current observations without additional inference overhead. VLA-Δ achieves performance competitive with the state of the art on LIBERO and RoboTwin, and outperforms π0.5 in real-robot experiments. Our code is available at https://github.com/ZJU-OmniAI/VLA-Delta
Qi Lu, Jiarun Li, Ce Zhang +5
Zhejiang University (zju.edu.cn) · Central South University (csu.edu.cn)