cs.SEOct 14, 2026

Robotic-supported Data Loss Detection in Android Applications

Authors: Davi Freitas, Breno Miranda, Juliano Iyoda

Organizations: Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil

Read PDF
Ask AI
Cite

Copy citation

DOINot available for this paper

Abstract

Smartphones have become integral to modern life due to their diverse applications. However, the development of applications for these devices faces significant challenges, primarily due to two factors: (i) the diverse hardware and operating system versions that require testing across multiple configurations; and (ii) the imperative activity of testing the smartphone in a non-invasive way (similar to an end-user interaction), which is expensive, tedious and error-prone as it is usually carried out manually. In this context, robotic automation has emerged as an effective solution for addressing the diversity of smartphone systems and versions, and in performing some testing tasks non-invasively. In addition, automated robots facilitate quick, accurate, and repetitive testing, thus enabling developers to validate their applications across various configurations effectively. This results in a less invasive verification and in a significant reduction in time spent on manual testing, thus accelerating the development cycle. Our work proposes R-DLD (Robotic-supported Data Loss Detection), a robot-assisted infrastructure for data loss detection in Android applications, offeringless invasive and more realistic tests by interacting directly with smartphone sensors. The robot is constructed using cost-effective materials, facilitating its adoption in testing environments. In our empirical evaluation R-DLD successfully identified 341 data loss issues in 77 randomly selected apps from an Android store. All reported bugs received responses from the developer, with 89.55% confirming the data loss problems, while 35.82% have being subsequently fixed.

More in this topic

Automated Software Testing

Automated software testing uses tools and algorithms to generate, run, and evaluate tests that find defects and prevent regressions.

See all 136 papers

Explore similar work

CardsList
Aug 26, 2026

RotDroid: Cross-Orientation State Equivalence Testing for Detecting GUI Rotation Bugs in Android Apps

Screen rotation is a fundamental interaction in Android applications, but it often introduces non-crashing functional failures (NCFs), such as layout inconsistencies and state loss, which are difficult to detect automatically. A key challenge is the lack of effective test oracles for checking cross-orientation state equivalence between portrait and landscape views. We propose RotDroid, a testing framework for detecting GUI rotation bugs via cross-orientation state equivalence. RotDroid generates and mutates State-Preserving action Sequences (SPS) to construct semantically equivalent GUI states across orientations. To support reliable oracle checking, we build RotBench, a dataset of paired portrait-landscape GUI states, and develop RotVL, a vision-language model fine-tuned for equivalence checking. Experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets show that RotVL outperforms state-of-the-art models, and RotDroid detects more rotation-induced failures than existing techniques under equal budgets. In large-scale studies on open- and closed-source apps, RotDroid reports 94 previously unknown bugs, with 47 confirmed or fixed by developers, demonstrating its practical effectiveness.

Mengdi Qin, Bo Jiang

SKLCCSE Beihang University Beijing 100191, China

Fault DetectionMobile GUI AutomationVision-Language ModelsMetamorphic Testing
AskPDF
Mar 26, 2026

MobileDev-Bench: A Benchmark for Issue Resolution in Mobile Application Development

Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong performance on automated software engineering tasks, yet existing benchmarks focus primarily on library-style repositories, leaving mobile application development largely unexplored despite its framework-specific build systems, heterogeneous artifact types, and coordinated multi-file fix requirements. We introduce MobileDev-Bench, a benchmark comprising 407 real-world issue-resolution tasks collected from 19 production mobile applications spanning Android Native (Java/Kotlin), React Native (TypeScript), and Flutter (Dart). Each task pairs a verified developer-reported issue with executable test patches, enabling fully automated validation of model-generated fixes within mobile build environments. The benchmark exhibits substantially greater patch complexity than prior benchmarks: fixes modify 12.9 files and 334.6 lines on average, and 41% of instances require coordinated changes across multiple artifact types, such as source, build configuration, and resource files. Evaluation of four frontier LLMs (Claude Sonnet 4.5, Qwen3-Coder, GPT-5.2, and Gemini 2.5 Flash) yields end-to-end resolution rates of only 3.23% - 4.23% under automated retrieval and at most 5.69% under oracle retrieval, well below resolution rates reported on existing benchmarks. We release MobileDev-Bench with task instances, an evaluation harness, and containerized environments to support reproducible research on AI-assisted mobile application development.

Moshood A. Fakorede, Krishna Upadhyay, A. B. Siddique +1

Louisiana State University · University of Kentucky

Software EngineeringSoftware Engineering BenchmarksAutomated Software EngineeringBenchmark Design
AskPDF
Feb 23, 2026

UAMTERS: Uncertainty-Aware Mutation Analysis for DL-enabled Robotic Software

Self-adaptive robots adjust their behaviors in response to unpredictable environmental changes. These robots often incorporate deep learning (DL) components into their software to support functionality such as perception, decision-making, and control, enhancing autonomy and self-adaptability. However, the inherent uncertainty of DL-enabled software makes it challenging to ensure its dependability in dynamic environments. Consequently, test generation techniques have been developed to test robot software, and classical mutation analysis injects faults into the software to assess the test suite's effectiveness in detecting the resulting failures. However, there is a lack of mutation analysis techniques to assess the effectiveness under the uncertainty inherent to DL-enabled software. To this end, we propose UAMTERS, an uncertainty-aware mutation analysis framework that introduces uncertainty-aware mutation operators to explicitly inject stochastic uncertainty into DL-enabled robotic software, simulating uncertainty in its behavior. We further propose mutation score metrics to quantify a test suite's ability to detect failures under varying levels of uncertainty. We evaluate UAMTERS across three robotic case studies, demonstrating that UAMTERS more effectively distinguishes test suite quality and captures uncertainty-induced failures in DL-enabled software.

Chengjie Lu, Jiahui Wu, Shaukat Ali +5

Simula Research Laboratory and University of Oslo · Simula Research Laboratory · Danish Technological Institute +1

Mutation TestingAutomated Software Testing
AskPDF