Unsupervised speech denoising methods such as MixIT and noisy-target training can be trained directly on noisy recordings, avoiding the sim-to-real gap of synthetic training data, but remain well below supervised performance. Teacher--student self-training, as in RemixIT, narrows this gap by remixing a teacher's estimates into new mixtures that supervise a student; however, since the student is trained only toward the teacher's estimates, teacher errors, in particular over-suppressed speech, are never recovered and propagate as the teacher is updated from the student. We propose SNOAR, a self-training framework that corrects the teacher's estimates before use: the noise leaked into its speech estimate is removed by differential noise filtering (DNF), and part of the noisy observation is added back in to restore suppressed speech and attenuate artifacts. We show that the two corrections depend on each other, as without DNF the loop collapses to the identity mapping. Compared to RemixIT, SNOAR is more stable along training and outperforms it in signal-based, perceptual, and word error rate metrics, reaching 97% of the SI-SDR improvement of a fully-supervised topline on WHAM!; on real CHiME-3 recordings, it improves every metric of three different teachers, while RemixIT degrades their perceptual quality.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: The SNOAR self-training framework. From a real recording xi the EMA teacher produces a speech and a noise estimate; the speech estimate is filtered against the noise estimate by DNF (Eq. 2 ) and combined with the observation by OA (Eq. 3 ), giving the corrected self-supervision s^ioa . This is remixed with the noise estimate of another recording xj to form the student input. The student is trained to reconstruct s^ioa and n^j , and the teacher is updated from the student weights by EMA.
System
SI-SDR
STOI
PESQ
D-OVRL
UTMOS
WER
Unprocessed
−1.48
0.751
1.10
1.46
1.38
19.8
Clean
∞
1.000
4.64
3.33
4.22
4.7
Supervised topline
13.68
0.952
2.26
3.21
3.60
9.5
NyTT [ 6 ]
0.20
0.776
1.13
1.60
1.36
18.1
NyTT+DNF [ 14 ] , teacher
4.87
0.847
1.32
2.43
2.05
17.7
RemixIT(NyTT+DNF)
9.32
0.913
1.56
2.61
2.67
13.1
Table 1: Results on the WHAM! test set. SNOAR and RemixIT are listed under the teacher they were initialised from (MixIT or DNF). For SI-SDR, the 95% confidence interval obtained via paired bootstrap over the test utterances has a half-width of at most 0.08 dB for every system.
Figure 2: SNOAR(MixIT) and RemixIT(MixIT) at every training checkpoint, scored on a randomly selected subset of 500 WHAM! cv utterances.
Arm
SI-SDR
PESQ
UTMOS
WER
α
λ
r
MixIT teacher
8.32
1.54
2.26
15.3
0.912
0.218
0.085
SNOAR(MixIT), γ=0.2
13.25
2.02
3.45
10.9
0.949
0.031
0.048
RemixIT(MixIT)
12.10
1.61
3.15
13.3
0.939
0.026
0.062
γ=0.5
−0.82
1.11
1.38
19.9
0.998
0.899
0.033
γ=0.1
13.14
1.87
3.47
11.1
0.946
0.020
0.050
γ=0 (no OA)
12.33
1.84
3.27
11.2
0.944
0.018
0.059
Table 2: Ablation of SNOAR(MixIT) on the WHAM! tt set. The first row is the method as described ( γ=0.2 ). α , λ and r are the speech, noise and artifact terms of the decomposition of Sec. 2 , with r the artifact energy as a fraction of the estimate’s.
Teacher
System
D-SIG
D-BAK
D-OVRL
UTMOS
WER
Unprocessed
2.05
1.50
1.48
1.38
22.0
MixIT (real)
Teacher
2.77
2.01
1.94
1.62
22.1
RemixIT
2.67
1.95
1.87
1.57
20.3
SNOAR
3.09
2.37
2.19
2.10
18.4
Mix+sup (WSJ)
Teacher
3.13
2.46
2.28
2.03
17.1
RemixIT
2.70
2.01
1.91
1.69
18.4
Table 3: Results on CHiME-3 et05_real , channel 5. No clean reference exists for these recordings, so only reference-free scores are reported. Each block is one in-domain teacher, trained without clean in-domain speech but allowed out-of-domain clean speech from WHAM! or LibriSpeech, followed by SNOAR and RemixIT adapted from it with the same budget of 7.5k steps.
Speech enhancement improves intelligibility and listening quality by suppressing noise, reverberation, and competing speakers in recorded or live audio.
In speech enhancement, standard supervised training requires pairs of noisy and clean speech. Such pairs are typically created by artificially degrading clean speech, leading to a domain mismatch between synthetic training data and real recordings. Noisy target training (NyTT) mitigates this limitation by training an enhancement model to predict a noisy recording from a noisier version generated by adding extra noise. However, since the training target is noisy, NyTT might learn to leave residual noise in the enhanced output. In this paper, we address this issue in NyTT by incorporating a Sinkhorn drifting loss that matches the distribution of the enhanced speech to that of unpaired clean speech. The Sinkhorn drifting loss attracts enhanced speech toward high-density regions of the clean-speech distribution while repelling it from the current enhanced-speech distribution in latent space. This loss uses only unpaired clean speech rather than the clean counterpart of each degraded recording, preserving the weakly-supervised nature of NyTT. Experimental results on VoiceBank-DEMAND and CHiME-3 real recordings demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed combination.
Yoshiki Masuyama, Dominik Klement, Christoph Boeddeker +5
Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories (MERL), USA · Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Japan
Self-supervised learning (SSL) representations are widely used in speech restoration (SR), and the prevailing trend is SSL feature cleansing: fine-tuning the SSL to recover clean features from degraded speech, then conditioning the restoration model on them. However, the representational capability of SSL when encoding degraded speech has been underexplored, and we ask whether cleansing always benefits SR training. Across SSL encoders and perceptual quality proxies, we discover perceptual correlation collapse---under severe degradation, cleansing degraded SSL features toward clean ones misaligns with the SR objective. We hypothesize the restoration backbone can supply the SSL with clues to resolve this collapse, since its intermediate layers already produce partially restored features. We therefore propose Early Restoration Injection (ERI), which routes intermediate features from the restoration backbone into the SSL through a lightweight conditioning network. ERI excels over the unconditioned baseline and, on the VoiceFixer benchmark, achieves competitive performance among multiple baselines.
Yongjoon Lee, Younghoo Kwon, Jung-Woo Choi
School of Electrical Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon, South Korea · Department of AI Systems, KAIST, Daejeon, South Korea
Audio-Text Foundation Models (ATMs) fail catastrophically under severe acoustic noise, yet existing adaptation strategies either rely on gradient-based Test-Time Adaptation (TTA), which reinforces noise rather than signal, or on prompt tuning that requires privileged noise annotations unavailable at inference. We address these failures with PRISM (Prototype-Rectified Iterative Self-supervised Manifold Denoising), a training-free, source-free TTA framework grounded in the Affine Noise Hypothesis: severe acoustic noise induces a low-rank affine shift in the multimodal latent space, with more than 90% of distortion energy confined to the leading 60 principal components. PRISM estimates and reverses this distortion from an unlabeled target batch using frozen text prototypes as geometric anchors via three closed-form geometric corrections compiled into a single static projection matrix by Affine Bias Regression. At inference, adaptation reduces to one matrix-vector multiplication in 0.0009 ms, making it substantially faster than gradient-based TTA while requiring no additional training. On UrbanSound8K, PRISM improves over the zero-shot baseline by 12.94 percentage points and surpasses an oracle-assisted TTA baseline by 9.41 percentage points, despite never observing its privileged augmented noise prompts. We further identify the Polyphonic Trap, a principled failure mode of subspace deflation for broadband classes, and resolve it via Confidence-Aware Regression (CAR), recovering up to 8.16 percentage points for the worst-affected class.
Ashish Anand Shukla, Rini Smita Thakur, Aryan Das +1
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Bhopal, India · Vellore Institute of Technology Bhopal, India