cs.CVOct 16, 2026

Direct Conditional Parameterization for N-Dimensional Splatting

Authors: Zhongpai Gao, Benjamin Planche, Van Nguyen Nguyen, Meng Zheng, Anwesa Choudhuri, Arun Innanje, Terrence Chen, Ziyan Wu

Organizations: United Imaging Intelligence, Boston, MA, USA

Abstract

N-dimensional splatting extends 3D Gaussian Splatting with view direction and time to model view-dependent and dynamic effects. Each primitive is lifted into a joint distribution over position and conditioning variables, then conditionally sliced at each rendering query. N-DGS and UBS share this step across Gaussian and Beta kernels: recovering the conditional mean, opacity, and covariance requires per-primitive matrix inversions and regression products in every forward pass. We introduce direct conditional parameterization, replacing this covariance-derived readout with explicit per-effect parameters: a Cholesky precision factor for opacity and a factorized query-to-position regression operator with learnable per-dimension coupling. Unrestricted conditional coordinates recover a valid joint covariance; our factorization adds spatial-scale and coupling priors. Applied to both kernels, the parameterization yields dGS (Gaussian) and dBS (Beta). Across five static and dynamic benchmarks, they match or exceed their covariance-derived counterparts on quality, with gains up to +1.26 dB in the main MCMC evaluation. Production slicing is 6.9-7.7 times faster than on-the-fly covariance-derived conditioning; complete-render profiling gives 1.25-1.91 times speedups on four trained scenes. Direct conditioning provides a structured, kernel-agnostic alternative for N-dimensional splatting. Project page: https://gaozhongpai.github.io/dgs/.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables7 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

Sep 11, 2026

Is Gaussian Splatting Becoming Neural Again? A Taxonomy and Controlled Study of Learned Parameterization

Three-dimensional Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) combines explicit primitives with efficient rasterization, yet recent systems increasingly use neural networks to generate or share Gaussian parameters. We characterize this trend along five axes: attribute decoding, spatial sharing, view-conditioned decoding, topology generation, and amortized inference. An analysis of 19 representative methods shows that these choices address different limitations and cannot be reduced to a binary neural label. We also isolate three forms of neural parameterization in a controlled mip-NeRF 360 study. Sharing appearance and opacity improves reconstruction quality, while decoding geometric structure offers no further gain. The evidence favors selective neuralization: shared functions help when they capture reusable correlations without sacrificing the local geometric freedom of explicit splats.
May 27, 2026

Eulerian Gaussian Splatting using Hashed Probability Pyramids

We introduce a probabilistic splat-based radiance field framework that retains the fast rasterization and test-time efficiency of 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) while replacing heuristic primitive manipulation with gradient-based optimization of a volumetric probability density. Rather than relocating, splitting, or culling Gaussians via hand-tuned densification (e.g., ADC), we treat primitive locations as samples drawn from a persistent, learnable density. We instantiate this density using a novel, memory-efficient multi-scale hierarchical grid that enables end-to-end gradient-based optimization. To stabilize the optimization, we derive an unbiased gradient estimator with control variates that markedly reduces variance. By allowing probability mass to flow to where the loss demands, our framework eliminates brittle priors and naturally explores the volume, achieving state-of-the-art reconstruction quality on mip-NeRF 360 while preserving 3DGS-level rendering speed.
Jul 12, 2026

DP-Splat: Bayesian Nonparametric Complexity Control for Gaussian Splatting

3D Gaussian Splatting represents scenes as finite mixtures of anisotropic Gaussians whose number of components KK is set by heuristic density control or user caps. Variational Bayes Gaussian Splatting (VBGS) recast splat fitting as conjugate variational inference, but KK remains fixed. We replace the finite symmetric Dirichlet over mixture weights with a truncated stick-breaking Dirichlet-process prior -- and, as a theory-backed alternative, a sparse overfitted finite Dirichlet -- so that the number of occupied components adapts to the data while every update remains a closed-form coordinate-ascent step; a natural-gradient stochastic variant makes the per-step cost independent of the number of points. We give an exact monotonicity guarantee, a rigorous truncation-error bound correcting an anti-conservative large-αα approximation in common use, and an honest account of what the fitted number of components estimates. Empirically: (i) the effective complexity K^\hat{K} adapts to scene complexity and recovers the true KK within ±1\pm 1 on well-separated synthetic data with regime-appropriate concentration; (ii) a deconfounded comparison shows the DP prior's contribution is complexity selection, not per-component efficiency -- converged DP fits exceed single-pass fixed-KK VBGS by +2.7 dB at matched budgets yet tie an equally converged fixed-KK baseline, and on 3D scenes DP-Splat matches or exceeds VBGS's held-out color prediction with 5.9-7.6x fewer components; (iii) the posterior-predictive color variance is well calibrated on model-matched synthetic data; and (iv) the ordering suggested by exact-posterior asymptotics reverses under mean-field coordinate ascent: the DP prior resists over-splitting while the sparse finite mixture saturates its truncation, a gap between variational practice and posterior asymptotics documented across three orders of magnitude in NN.