Contracting with an Agent under Model Mismatch

We consider the dynamic principal-agent problem under asymmetric information, wherein a principal sequentially designs contracts to incentivize an agent with unknown preferences and hidden actions. A fundamental bottleneck in the existing literature is the assumption of deterministic agent utility, which renders the principal's expected utility discontinuous and forces computationally intractable discretizations of the contract space. In this paper, we address this limitation by introducing a stochastic counterpart into the agent's utility model, capturing the inherent physical and behavioral variations in realistic subsystems. We formally prove that this stochastic formulation restores the continuity of the principal's expected utility. Leveraging this continuous geometric structure, we formulate the interaction as a structured multi-armed bandit problem subject to heteroscedastic noise. We propose a Heteroscedastic GP-UCB algorithm that utilizes a Neural Network (Arcsin) kernel, chosen to capture the non-stationary, sigmoidal geometry of the utility landscape. For an $m$-dimensional compact contract space, we establish a high-probability cumulative regret bound of $O\left(\sqrt{T}(\log T)^{m+1}\right)$. Finally, we demonstrate the practical efficacy of our theoretical framework by formulating the Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) incentive design problem, proving its equivalence to a dynamic principal-agent problem, and showing superior economic performance for grid aggregators.

We study the consequences of information asymmetries and misaligned incentives in settings with multiple independent agents. We model an interaction between a Sender, who holds vital private information but cannot act, and a Receiver, who must make decisions but is dependent on the Sender's information. We find that the Sender learns an optimal communication strategy that the Receiver reliably acts on. Importantly, this strategy is highly sensitive to the degree of conflict in the agents' rewards and the amount of environmental information the Receiver can already observe. We introduce a mechanism allowing the agents to form linear contracts, where a price is established for the information. We demonstrate that the Sender learns to use these payment structures to improve its rewards, though this comes at a cost of "fairness" between agents as the Sender is able to extract much of the Receiver's surplus. This raises questions about fairness, contract design, and learning in the context of multi-agent systems.

We study repeated contract design when a principal observes outcomes but not the actions that generate them. The principal may use any bounded outcome-contingent payment vector, and the agent's best response can make expected profit discontinuous in those payments. For every fixed number $m\ge2$ of outcomes, the minimax regret over $T$ rounds is of order $T^{m/(m+1)}$, up to logarithmic factors. The upper bound allows arbitrary action spaces and agent heterogeneity, without smoothness or monotone-surplus assumptions. Its key is an effective-dimension reduction that the benchmark can be normalized even when fixed tie-breaking is not shift invariant, after which revealed preference yields a monotone response map in payment-difference coordinates. A learning policy built on a Lipschitz parametrization of this map attains the rate using only observed outcome categories. The lower-bound construction accounts for how incentive losses accumulate across outcome dimensions. It shows that each additional contractible outcome creates a precise and unavoidable increase in the worst-case cost of learning.