stat.MLOct 19, 2026

Towards instance-dependent regret optimality in Episodic MDPs with Posterior Sampling

Authors: Victor Boone, Cyrille Kone, Waris Radji, Odalric-Ambrym Maillard, Dorian Baudry

Organizations: IRIT, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse INP, Toulouse, France · LAAS-CNRS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France · Univ. Lille, Inria, CNRS, Centrale Lille, UMR 9189-CRIStAL, F-59000 Lille, France · Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inria, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LIG, 38000 Grenoble, France

Abstract

We study regret minimization in finite-horizon episodic Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). While minimax-optimal algorithms are known, tractable approaches to instance-dependent optimality are still lacking. Motivated by this gap, we introduce π0π_0-PSRL, a variant of PSRL that uses posterior samples to decide when exploration is needed, while following a fixed reference policy π0π_0 during exploration episodes. This decouples the test for exploration, triggered when the sampled and empirical MDPs have different optimal policies, from the choice of the policy used to gather information. The resulting design addresses a limitation of standard PSRL, where the sampled optimal policy may not be the optimal choice for exploration. We prove instance-dependent regret bounds for π0π_0-PSRL, identifying the logarithmic exploration cost induced by π0π_0 and taking a step toward matching asymptotic lower bounds for episodic RL. Our proof techniques showcase a novel proof structure to derive problem-dependent regret bounds in episodic MDPs, and concentration results for Dirichlet random variables, that may be of independent interest.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables2 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

Sep 27, 2026

Minimax-Optimality of Posterior Sampling for Reinforcement Learning

Posterior sampling for reinforcement learning (PSRL) is one of the simplest and most effective exploration methods, but a basic question has remained open: does unmodified PSRL achieve minimax regret without structural assumptions on the prior? We answer yes. Exact vanilla PSRL is minimax optimal in leading-order Bayesian regret under arbitrary correlated priors. The difficulty is that a posterior-sampled transition model is coupled with its own continuation value. We overcome this with a common empirical transition reference that isolates the resulting value mismatch and a Bellman-based variance argument that controls it without an extra leading-order state-space factor. For finite-horizon, time-inhomogeneous tabular MDPs with unknown stochastic rewards, this yields the minimax O~(SAH3K)\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{SAH^3K}) regret rate under arbitrary joint priors over rewards and transitions. The same proof principle gives the minimax O~(dH3K)\widetilde{O}(d\sqrt{H^3K}) rate for linear-mixture MDPs under arbitrary joint parameter priors.
Mar 9, 2026

Posterior Sampling Reinforcement Learning with Gaussian Processes for Continuous Control: Sublinear Regret Bounds for Unbounded State Spaces

We analyze the Bayesian regret of the Gaussian process posterior sampling reinforcement learning (GP-PSRL) algorithm. Posterior sampling is a heuristic for decision-making under uncertainty that has been used to develop successful algorithms for a variety of continuous control problems. However, theoretical work on GP-PSRL is limited. All known regret bounds either have a sub-optimal growth rate, require strong smoothness assumptions, or fail to properly account for the fact that the set of possible system states is unbounded. Through a recursive application of the Borell-Tsirelson-Ibragimov-Sudakov inequality, we show that, with high probability, the states actually visited by the algorithm are contained within a ball of near-constant radius. We then use the chaining method to control the regret suffered by GP-PSRL under weak smoothness conditions. Our main result is a Bayesian regret bound of the order O~(HγTT)\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(H\sqrt{γ_TT}), where HH is the horizon, TT is the number of time steps and γTγ_T is the expected information gain. With this result, we resolve the limitations with prior theoretical work on PSRL, and provide the theoretical foundation and tools for analyzing PSRL in complex settings.
Feb 18, 2026

Improved Bounds for Reward-Agnostic and Reward-Free Exploration

We study reward-free and reward-agnostic exploration in episodic finite-horizon Markov decision processes (MDPs), where an agent explores an unknown environment without observing external rewards. Reward-free exploration aims to enable εε-optimal policies for any reward revealed after exploration, while reward-agnostic exploration targets εε-optimality for rewards drawn from a small finite class. In the reward-agnostic setting, Li, Yan, Chen, and Fan achieve minimax sample complexity, but only for restrictively small accuracy parameter εε. We propose a new algorithm that significantly relaxes the requirement on εε. Our approach is novel and of technical interest by itself. Our algorithm employs an online learning procedure with carefully designed rewards to construct an exploration policy, which is used to gather data sufficient for accurate dynamics estimation and subsequent computation of an εε-optimal policy once the reward is revealed. Finally, we establish a tight lower bound for reward-free exploration, closing the gap between known upper and lower bounds.