cs.ETOct 19, 2026

Bidirectionality is Necessary in Cellular Machines for Exact-Arrival Multi-Agent Path Finding

Authors: Masashi Aono

Organizations: Amoeba Energy Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan · Keio University, Fujisawa, Kanagawa, Japan

Abstract

On ranked directed acyclic graphs coupled by vertex conflicts we study exact-arrival multi-agent path finding (departure and arrival pinned in place and time) posed as a distributed output task: every cell must emit its own bit of a valid joint path-support mask. The machines are cellular: one automaton per cell, state factored over cells, communication only along a fixed local fabric, synchronous rounds, a query-independent output round, no central decoder, and a per-topology transition code. "Necessary" here means: on an explicit hard topology, over all its feasible queries, no universally correct local-only architecture can renounce either temporal orientation; with global flags, impossibility becomes a bandwidth-round trade-off. The class is not vacuous: a flooding machine solves every instance in as many rounds as the diameter of the local fabric. The bound survives two concessions: we supply every agent's exact individual cavity, which alone solves the single-agent problem in zero rounds and makes the single-agent direction theorem vacuous; and we allow kk one-bit global aggregate flags. On a twelve-cell, two-agent, depth-three topology no forward-only machine with k=0k=0 is correct on two feasible queries, for any number of rounds; the time-reversed topology does the same to backward-only machines. Placing pp copies side by side gives, for forward-only machines, JR+kR≥pJ_R+kR\ge p at constant depth, where JRJ_R measures how much of the query reaches the targets' cones and is 00 here. A backward-only machine solves that family in constant rounds and a flag-streaming one in ⌈p/k⌉+O(1)\lceil p/k\rceil+O(1), so the bound is tight in order; on the composite family neither orientation can be renounced. The finite lemmas of the gadget and the pair-invariance contradictions are checked in Lean 4; the semantic bridge, the cone lemma and the counting are paper proofs. We report no benchmarks.

Explore similar work

May 12, 2026

Distance-Constrained Unlabeled Multi-Agent Pathfinding

We study a graph pathfinding problem Distance-rr Independent Unlabeled Multi-Agent Pathfinding, finding a set of collision-free paths between two sets where agents must stay at pairwise distance at least r+1r+1 at all times. This additional constraint, generalizing collision modeling for classical MAPF, targets aspects of real-world multi-agent coordination. This additional distance constraint makes feasibility (i.e., whether a solution exists) PSPACE-complete, in contrast to standard (unlabeled) MAPF, where it can be decided in polynomial time. We address the challenge via two complementary approaches: (i) reduction-based optimal algorithms with a feasibility-preserving compression procedure, and (ii) a configuration generator-based search. Despite the hardness, empirical results show that our algorithm can handle hundreds of agents in a practical timeframe.
Aug 8, 2026

AOC-CBS: Anytime-Optimal Continuous-time Conflict-Based Search for Generalised Multi-Agent Path Finding

Many research fields share a common structure: a set of agents, each pursuing its own goal, whose actions must be coordinated so that no two of them conflict. Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) is a concrete instance of this structure, with applications from warehouses to road traffic and airports. Much of MAPF research assumes discrete time, circular agents sharing one spatial graph, a single goal per agent, and that an agent must remain at its goal once reached, precluding heterogeneous fleets, non-geometric conflicts, task sequences, and agents that move on after completing them. We generalise the MAPF formulation to lift these assumptions, and present Anytime-Optimal Continuous-time Conflict-Based Search (AOC-CBS), an exact and solution-complete solver for it. AOC-CBS guarantees the eventual return of an optimal solution, while reporting an incumbent with a known optimality gap upper bound throughout its runtime; it is configurable with a portfolio of repair functions, one of which we introduce (Tier-Prioritized Safe Interval Path Planning), and can exploit multiple processor cores. We demonstrate AOC-CBS on a mixed fleet of non-convex agents moving along smooth, kinodynamically feasible trajectories. Preliminary experiments against the exact solver OC-CBS, on well-known benchmarks and roadmaps we sample from them, show AOC-CBS is comparable at finding optimal solutions while extending scalability from the tens to the hundreds of agents when a bounded optimality gap is accepted.
Oct 7, 2026

The Cost of Classical Multi-Agent Path Finding

Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) is the problem of planning conflict-free paths for multiple agents in a shared space, each from its start to its goal. Classical MAPF has been the dominant formulation for many years, with its assumptions of discrete time and graph-based conflicts presumably easing the search for solutions. These assumptions limit the physical environments and agents for which a solution is truly collision-free, and also place an upper bound on solution quality that no algorithmic improvements can lift. This work investigates how much solution quality, and in what contexts, the classical MAPF formulation forfeits. Continuous-time MAPF (MAPFR_R) relaxes these assumptions, making it a natural counter-formulation to compare against across various agent counts and sizes, and graph connectedness, topologies, and resolutions. We find that continuous time and agent shape consideration are worth relatively little on their own; their value comes from enabling an expanded range of move actions, on average improving solution quality by at least 5%5\% on narrow and constrained maps and 17%17\% on maps with open spaces. In some cases, the improvements exceed 20%20\%. Doubling the map resolution with classical MAPF recovers less than 3%3\%, meaning that little of what is forfeited can be bought back through more compute. This work therefore provides insight on when classical MAPF is a reasonable simplification, and when MAPFR_R unlocks significantly higher-quality solutions.