Learning from Automatic 3D Gaussian Splatting Edits for Online Bayesian Scene Change Detection

Online scene change detection requires an agent to detect what has changed in a previously mapped environment while it is still on site, observing from unconstrained viewpoints and without access to future observations. This causal setting is strictly harder than its offline counterpart, and online methods have consistently trailed offline accuracy. O-SCD closed that gap by treating change as a persistent property of a 3D Gaussian splatting map of the reference scene, surpassing the strongest offline methods in change detection accuracy while operating at over 10 frames per second. O-SCD optimizes a change field over the Gaussians of the reference map, refitting it to all past cue maps at every frame, a step that consumes more than half of the per-frame budget and forces accuracy to be traded against speed. We present a replay-free formulation that eliminates this trade-off. Because the reference map stays fixed, rendering the change field is a linear operation. Each new observation can therefore be carried onto the map's Gaussians directly, by a single backward pass of the renderer, which reduces multi-view fusion to an exact two-scalar recursion per Gaussian. Past observations are never stored or revisited. The self-supervised objective that O-SCD minimizes by descent also determines the decision threshold exactly, by sorting, yielding a label-free per-frame cutoff whose margin provides a selective-prediction signal. On PASLCD, our method improves mean intersection over union from 0.489 to 0.575 and throughput from 11.8 to 25.6 frames per second, even exceeding O-SCD's offline result while remaining strictly causal.

Scene change detection methods built on Gaussian splatting universally follow a render-then-compare paradigm: the pre-change scene is rendered into 2D and compared against post-change images via pixel or feature residuals. This change detection problem with Gaussian Splatting has been treated as a question about pixels; we treat it as a question about primitives. We provide direct evidence that native primitive attributes alone -- position, anisotropic covariance, and color -- carry sufficient signal for scene change detection. What makes primitive-space comparison hard is the under-constrained nature of Gaussian splatting representation: independent optimizations yield primitive solutions whose count, positions, shapes, and colors differ even where nothing has changed. We address this challenge with anisotropic models of geometric and photometric drift, complemented by a per-primitive observability term that reflects the extent to which each Gaussian is constrained by the camera geometry. Operating directly on primitives gives our method, GD-DIFF, two properties that distinguish it from render-then-compare methods. First, change maps are multi-view consistent by construction, where prior work had to learn this through an additional optimization objective. Second, geometric and appearance changes are scored separately, identifying not just where but what kind of change occurred, distinguishing structural changes (e.g., an added object) from surface-level ones (e.g., a color change) without supervision or external model dependencies. On real-world benchmarks, GS-DIFF surpasses the prior state-of-the-art approach by $\sim$17% in mean Intersection over Union.

Factories, museums and surveyors photograph the same space months apart and need to know which objects changed. When each visit is reconstructed with 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS), a direct comparison of the two reconstructions does not answer this. Training is stochastic, so two reconstructions of an unchanged space never coincide, and the second visit is often a quick re-scan with far fewer photographs. We propose GS-Pool, which takes two independently reconstructed Gaussian fields of the same space and returns the changed objects in each, together with their masks. SAM2 masks of each visit's photographs are lifted onto the Gaussians that render them and merged into an object pool, so every decision is taken once per object in 3D. We introduce a photographic carrier, the 3DGS training loss of each input reconstruction against the other visit's photographs, backpropagated to the Gaussians that rendered each pixel. We combine it with GS-Diff's geometry and colour terms and our distilled DINOv3 features. This evidence is compared with that of the objects present in both visits, which sets a change threshold for each scene. On PASLCD, GS-Pool reaches mIoU/F1 scores of 0.751/0.846 against 0.644/0.758 for GS-Diff, the strongest prior method, a gain of 17%/12%. Its mIoU is also 36%, 40% and 57% above that of O-SCD, PlenoCI and MV-3DCD, and it reaches 0.855 mIoU on CL-Splats, 33% above MV-3DCD. Each changed object is returned as a set of Gaussians with the evidence behind its decision, which an inspector can review in 3D.