Dynamics of Hidden Learning Structure

A learning system can occupy execution states that are indistinguishable under every declared present-behavior readout yet respond differently to future training. We formalize this through fiber fingerprints: controlled future-learning response laws restricted to present-behavior equivalence classes. Prefix-compatible finite probes induce a predictive quotient functor, a Nerode-type minimal recursively sufficient representation, and a canonical set-level predictive fiber without assuming smoothness, reversibility, finite rank, or a manifold. Under an explicit finite-dimensional Hilbert realization, response decomposes into visible, visible-mode-reuse, and irreducible-new sectors; a history-reachability bridge retains only distinctions generated by natural training histories. Conditional mechanism results then identify a graph-Hodge chronology decomposition, a regular switching class with root-mean-square scale $\sqrt{p}η^{3/2}$ and finite-scale corrections, and an exact Adam moment section whose immediate adaptive field is constant while common future gradients can reveal hidden moment differences. Frozen Transformer--LoRA--AdamW studies with Qwen2.5-7B and Mistral-7B-v0.3 support a local action backbone, longer-horizon first-return non-closure, and fresh visible-relative completion with output-range reuse and a low-rank irreducible sector. Stronger claims remain bounded by preregistered negative or mixed results: re-anchored transport is unresolved above its measurement floor; the strict finite-grid Hodge--$3/2$ conjunction is unmet despite prospective contraction; Qwen accessibility is not established in the frozen raw moment chart; and Mistral revelation is future-context dependent rather than bank invariant. Within these support-, scale-, metric-, and context-resolved boundaries, present behavior is not a sufficient statistic for declared future learning.

Learning must acquire new capabilities while preserving both prior responsibilities and the capacity to learn again. We introduce Generalized Residual Closure (GRC), a framework for learning as recursive closure of future-relevant discrepancies: closing a residual establishes the conditions for subsequent prediction, interaction, and learning. Under a complete representation-relation description at a fixed learner-world boundary, persistent internal learning has two primitive modes: Transformation within a representation and revision of the Representation itself. We establish a local tangent decomposition under regularity assumptions and a criterion for when representation revision is necessary. In an affine model, we derive a necessary-and-sufficient condition for stability-plasticity compatibility and the unique solution of a constrained quadratic update problem, which preserves registered old responsibilities while reducing residuals with an effective safe response. We prove that reconstructive semantic protection weakly enlarges the safe-response operator relative to preserving an exact historical realization. Dynamic sufficiency and future-closure viability extend representation adequacy from current prediction to lawful future updating and continued learning. Growth Learning expands the lawful closure domain or lowers optimal closure cost without regression of the registered capability-cost frontier; a conditional commit rule maintains this order. Restricted-sector recoveries and a conditional representation theorem connect the framework to optimization, machine learning, and control. Together, these results organize adaptation, representation revision, and reusable capability within a common account of continued learning.

A learner's current observations need not determine its response to further training. We formulate intrinsic-extrinsic coupling through the continuation-conditioned value of a constrained learning-state intervention, with observation-relative fibers describing present agreement. An executable finite-frame classifier-head write protects current logits while repairing specified historical margins under finite-precision acceptance checks. We distinguish local admissibility, continuation-conditioned intervention value, and complete-policy performance. A matched four-cell contrast identifies readout-specific non-additivity between the same intrinsic intervention and alternative external continuations. In a CLINC-derived class-incremental setting, replay changes the write's 32-update contribution from five correct predictions to zero. Nonzero interactions also occur under output distillation, with a RoBERTa backbone, and under optimizer-native SGDW dynamics. Under SGDW, correct-count interactions are negative in all three activated roots at 128 updates, showing that coupling need not imply positive synergy. The mathematical analysis distinguishes feasible local repairs and favorable terminal outputs from training-reachable repair regions. Separate coordination tests show that content controls match or exceed the development gain, while a five-root fresh-test comparison with Fiber present in every arm shows root-dependent rather than uniformly beneficial correct-count effects. On the secondary cross-entropy readout, guided allocation yields lower mean loss than standard replay in all five pairs. Together, these results make intrinsic-extrinsic coupling operational by connecting executable state geometry to continuation-conditioned value, matched interaction identification, and closed-loop coordination, while separating identified coupling from complete-policy performance.